Differences Between Texas Government And Federal Government

Improved Essays
The Texas government and the federal government work in a different way. I am going to analyze the most significant differences between them, while considering how they affect the way both governments address the popular and elite interests and how they promote participation.
The most significant different between the Constitutions is that the Texas Constitution is much more detailed than the U.S. Constitution. Some articles and sections in the Texas Constitution are so detailed that they look like laws. This level of detailing makes it harder for the legislature to change something because it is harder to amend the Constitution than changing a law. I think this is a way in which the Texas Constitution tries to protect the people’s interest and promote participation, because the public has to vote before an amendment is implemented, but this attempt has backfired because the most people don’t vote for the amendments and too many amendments have been passed, leading to a disorganized Constitution. In the case of the U.S. Constitution, people don’t vote for the
…show more content…
The Texas governor is the Head of State, but he is relatively weak because he shares power with the other members of the executive branch and they are not subordinate to the governor, so they might have conflicting agendas. I think that operating like this, the Texas’ executive would not be able to address the people’s needs and interests in an effective way because the members might just waste time by fighting each other. However, this system promotes participation because most members are elected by the people and there are more officials to listen to them.
There are many differences between the federal government and the Texas government, and I think that, overall, the federal government does a better job at protection the people’s interest and promoting public

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The U.S. constitution was written during the Philadelphia Convention which was convened from May 25 to September 17, 1787 and was signed September 17, 1787. The current Texas constitution took effect on February 15, 1876, and is the seventh constitution in Texas history. There are many differences and similarities between these two constitutions. They both provide for a separation of power between legislative, executive, and judicial branches, checks and balances, bill of rights and discuss federalism but they also have their differences, with length and language. The U.S. constitution is very short and obscure and allows the federal government to apply specific powers while the Texas constitution is long and detailed and specifically says…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With just these four different departs, you can see that the United States and the Texas Constitution have a lot more differences than some of us actually even thought. The differences between the two can keep going on and on for the fact that they were made for two completely different reasons. It just goes to show that the states can set higher level standards than the national government in certain places. These two constitutions both have their own form of way to get the things they want across to the many people they decide they want to get them across to. Even though one way may be different from the other everything still goes the way it needs to go and how it's supposed to go, of course with a little bump in the road sometimes.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas has many standards put in place that allow it to be a very fiscally responsible state. The Texas constitution places strict limits on taxation, requires that the budget is always balanced, and places many limits on government spending. And because the legislature is in charge of the state budget, the legislature also has great power over all state agencies. The constitution allows them to decide whether each state agency is using the resources allocated to them properly, or whether they want to cut their spending. On top of deciding the fiscal limits of state agencies, legislature has the power to create new agencies, abolish old ones, and even completely redefine the responsibilities of existing agencies.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The current debate is on whether the Texas Constitution should be rewritten or not. Therefore, here a number of arguments for and against the rewriting of the constitution are represented. The proponents and opponents of the Texas Constitution to be rewritten have strong arguments to support or deny the idea. First of all, the Constitution is too long and needs to be organized. It is one of the constitutions that have gone through many amendments making it more complex and the longest of all the constitutions of the United States (Hooks: 2011).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The level of detail is incredible for such a poorly written document. The document covers literally just about everything from water boards, bond sales, parks administration, elections for sheriff and the sale of school lands. According the writers of the constitution the high level is nonexistent without confusing organization. Coverage of each individual subject is found in several parts of the document. The current Constitution contains gaps where entire sections have been repealed with sections having titles only but no text (Article XIII – Spanish and Mexican Land Titles repealed in 1969).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kristin Paull Professor Jennifer Ritchey Texas Government 2306 September 7, 2015 The Texas Constitution The state of Texas has gone through many constitutional revisions since the first was introduced. It differs in many ways from the federal constitution and has some provisions that are unique to it. The current constitution is continually growing and being revised as times change, to become more modern for our industrialized state.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One side felt Texas could “increase the wealth and happiness of all classes in our society” (Doc G) and believed “all this patriotism ¬-all this philanthropy -all this religion- appeals to us in favor of the addition of Texas to our Union” (Doc G). On the other hand, the opponents knew that “we are anxious to force free government on all” (Doc H) but only under “a very high state of moral and intellectual improvement, in a civilized state” (Doc H) is the nation able maintain a free government and form “a constitution capable of endurance” (Doc H).…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Who should have more power the Federal or State Governments? I think that the Federal Government should have more power than State Government. When depending on the State Government they were only depending on it for money. When the people of the states came together to change the Article of Confederation the State Government lost some of its power and got weaker the Federal Government gave the power from the State to the central Government. The Federal Government was stronger than the State Government from the very beginning the Federal Government had the power to take power whenever it wanted and the state could not do a thing about it because, the Federal Government was stronger in many other aspects that the state…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is also hard for Texas to let women, students and the poor to vote, it forces women to present a valid ID in order to vote, you need to a driver’s license, a state personal ID card, a concealed handgun license, a U.S. military ID card, a U.S. citizenship certificate, or a U.S. passport. Another good reason why Texas isn’t ready to secede is because Texas is running out of drugs to execute their inmates, and the only way they can get more is if they stay with the United States. And this is really a big thing for Texas because is the state with the highest execution rate in the country. And like I say before, Texas is not as good financially like they think they are that means Texas relies more on federal dollars and less on its own taxes than it did when Perry took office. Put another way: Texas is less independent than it was when the governor took office, not more.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The committee can either determine to go further with the bill or completely get rid of it.(Governing Texas, Pg.…

    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    to help the nation as a whole. However, the State’s government differs a little when compared to the Federal government. The Federal government takes into account the whole nation—United States in this case—when governing. The State government only takes into account itself—California in this case. Looking at the three branches of the Federal government—the executive, judicial and legislative, one can see the differences starting…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All constitutions since the beginning of time has been set in written documents, allowing future governments to follow the guidelines to guide the country. United States and Texas Governments are in many ways similar as they both embody the principles of representative democratic government present in the country, which allows sovereignty from the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas plural executive exists to limit the power of the Texas Governor with the exception of the Secretary of State. The people of the State of Texas and not the governor himself elect all positions of the plural executive with the exception of the Secretary of State. The offices that make up the plural executive are Governor, Lieutenant Governor, The Comptroller of Public Accounts, Commissioner of Agriculture, Commissioner of the General Land Office and The Secretary of State. The reasoning for the formation of the plural executive is to limit the power the governor has.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One difference that many people can still not decide on is if they would rather have a strong central government or a strong state government. Some think this decision is among the wealthy and the poor. According to those people, the wealthy might like a strong federal government because it is easier for them to reach out to it compared to the poor or ones not as wealthy basically rely on the state government to live. These arguments and debates could continue for a long time, but there are positives and negatives to each side that some just need to accept. With a strong central government, its authority derives from the people.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays