• Home Page
  • Difference Between Relativism And Objectivism

Difference Between Relativism And Objectivism

Improved Essays
Show More
Relativism vs. Objectivism
There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes? The answer would mean the relativist would change the entire meaning of ethics. Both relativism and objectivism are debated as to which is morally correct. I will discuss both theories and give my opinion on which theory I hold. Both will be discussed and my opinion will be provided on which I hold to be morally correct.
Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.” …show more content…
No matter what we think or believe, things are what they are because that is how they exist in the universe. There is a higher power who says what is morally good and how we should live our lives.
If I had to respond to an opposing argument, I would have to say that you cannot have a cookie cutter approach to morality. Society needs rules to function because they are absolutes, providing a structure we can all live by. Without rules you have conflict, with conflict you have chaos, and when you have chaos you live in a dangerous world.
I spoke about the two theories of moral standards: Ethical relativism and Ethical objectivism. The theory of Ethical Objectivism is one that I relate to because some rules are correct, and these determine which moral claims are true and which are false. No matter what we think or believe, things are what they are because that is how they exist in the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Divine Nature Theory
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Divine Nature Theory

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Theories Of Moral Relativism
    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Theories Of Moral Relativism

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture

    Similarly, ethical relativism is the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles, but that all moral principles are valid to culture or individual choice. (Vice and Virtue) On one hand the Diversity thesis believes that morality differ from society to society, and there is no universal moral principles. On the other hand, the Dependency thesis states that all moral principles derive their validity from cultural acceptance. (Vice and Virtue)…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Moral Relativism
    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Examples Of Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pojman Argument On Conventionalism Vs Subjectivism
    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pojman Argument On Conventionalism Vs Subjectivism

    These universal principles go against ethical relativism to make it…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito
    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    James Nagel's Views On Moral Relativism
    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    James Nagel's Views On Moral Relativism

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Why Do We Accept Moral Relativism?
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Do We Accept Moral Relativism?

    Upsettingly, it has become the case that in the modern world many have come to accept relativistic ethics as a viable ethical theory. While this is not the case in the realm of philosophy, where only the minority accepts relativistic ethics, it is still saddening to see the common man accept such a dangerous perspective. The acceptance of moral relativism is essentially the acceptance of immoralism, due to the fact that with its acceptance there becomes no possible way to declare any action immoral. For philosophers, objective ethics are viewed positively, as most philosophers recognize the inherent contradictions and intellectual laziness in moral relativism. For objective ethics there are two major contemporary approaches.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Arguments Within Ethical Relativism
    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Arguments Within Ethical Relativism

    Ethical Relativism supports the view of how the truth of principals is relative cultures. However, the subjective is what is right for you as an individual or upon what is your particular culture believe what is right for you. I agree with Ethical Relativism it teaches that a society evolve over time to fit their circumstances, It refers to a corporate to refer which is wrong or which is right, refers to an individual determination of what's right or what’s wrong. Therefore, various views within ethical relativism always say an individual always have different opinions on whether ethics are based on culture or not.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Normative Ethics: Consequentialism Vs. Kantianism
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Normative Ethics: Consequentialism Vs. Kantianism

    For centuries, philosophers have applied sets of normative principles in effort to distinguish if an action is morally right or wrong. The purpose of normative ethics is to help guide society on how humans ought to act. These theories provide justifiable and reliable outcomes to determine if an action is moral or immoral. Two principles that play a significant role in normative ethics are consequentialism and Kantianism. When faced with a moral dilemma, these theories may agree or conflict with one another.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument Of Moral Relativism
    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Argument Of Moral Relativism

    Morals are a tricky subject that philosophers have tried to decipher for some millennia. There have been many arguments regarding morals and where they originate. Some believe moral truths are the same for everyone, while others believe that morality is relative to each person. There is a divide between the two groups and very compelling arguments for and against the two belief systems. Relativism is a philosophy that claims that all things are relative and completely denies absolutes.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay
    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Relativism Essay

    One of the first major problem that moral relativism poses for ethics would be that people could abuse it and use it as an excuse for some of the decisions that they make. Perhaps, they are doing something that is seen as immortal to majority of cultures, but they claim that it is moral because they have seen in other cultures that it is morally accepted because it fits the beliefs and or customs that a certain may have. Another issue that may pose a problem for ethics would be that moral relativism leads to absurd conclusion, and changes our ability to deliberate straight and make certain opinions about moral or ethical issues. If there is absolutely no moral law than there is no foundation for…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Summary Of The Elements Of Moral Philosophy By James And Stuart Rachels
    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of The Elements Of Moral Philosophy By James And Stuart Rachels

    Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Meta Ethical Theory
    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Essay On Meta Ethical Theory

    Therefore, moral relativism is the most reasonable way to look at ethics as ethics can widely differ within its unique context. In identifying the ways of knowing, we have clarified that people take different approaches toward various ethical issues under their own unique context. Then, we explored the areas of study in which ethics are involved, and discovered that certain context, such as time period, can create different viewpoints on ethics. By clearly evaluating the meta-ethical theories after identifying the crucial elements that compose ethics, we discover that moral relativism is the most reasonable way to look at ethics as ethics can widely differ within its unique…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Relativism Research Paper
    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Relativism Research Paper

    Accessed 25 Sept. 2017. “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-relativism.htm Velasquez, Manuel, et al. “Ethical Relativism.” Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethical-relativism/. Accessed 25 Sept. 2017 ”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is” practiced”https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethical-relativism/ “Cultural Relativism.” AllAboutPhilosophy.org, www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-relativism.htm.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings