Descartes Meditations

Improved Essays
Descartes in this meditation wants to clarify what "I" is and how he can achieve this

conclusion. He does not want to use his senses or imagination because as he has stated before

they can be deceiving. He asserts how his senses and imagination are deceiving because he does

not know if what he sees, smells or perceives to be truth, exists only in his head. He uses a piece

of wax to explain what he thinks the wax is according to his senses. His sense of taste tells him

that it still has some of the honey flavor, his sense of smell says that it still smells like flowers

and his sense of touch says that it is hard and cold. As he burns the wax it loses its honey flavor,

scent of flowers and its hardness but he still knows that
…show more content…
He uses this example to show that his mind is greater than his

body. His body is like the sensible features of the wax which can only be determined by the

senses. On the other hand his mind is like the core properties of what makes wax despite the

many forms wax can achieve when under heat or cold which translates to his mind will still exist

whether his body exists or not or what shape it comes in.

Descartes in his argument does not realize there is a contradiction. He says that he does

not want to use his senses because they are deceiving. Descartes says, “For example, I now see a

light, I hear a noise… Properly speaking, this is what is called ‘sensing.’ But this precisely so

taken, is nothing other than thinking”(66). He believes that his senses are now just a thought of

what his body is sensing. This example makes me think that the mind cannot exist without the

senses, which in turn becomes the body. I believe this to be true because he also explains that his

imagination can just make things up and it is part of his mind. Following the use of the

imagination, we need our senses in order to imagine things. In class we used the example of
…show more content…
Descartes wants to explain that something makes the wax aside from

the sensible features, almost like the forms of Plato. Descartes’s form of the wax is, “ that is

something extended, flexible and mutable” (67). These three features exist in everyone’s mind

and that is why we know the wax was still wax despite losing its sensible features. The same

should be said about what makes Descartes himself and in a more general sense what makes

humans, humans.

In a modern sense, the invention of touchscreen devices could be seen as a contradiction

of using our senses to use our mind. I do not believe anyone had seen or felt a touch-sensitive

device before the creation of the first one. It had to be that someone thought about it and that it

would be useful. Although similarly to the unicorn example where pieces of previous inventions

were probably used to create the touch-sensitive glass on these devices, some external

knowledge of the mind had to be used in order to enable the parts of the old inventions to

combine to create a touch-sensitive glass. Following Descartes thoughts the only explanation

would be that the idea of a touch-sensitive device exists in our mind without the need of our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Mind-Body Problem is the argument surrounding questions such as: “How does the mind relate to the body (brain)? Are they—the mind and the brain—separate? Does the mind even exist, or is there really just the brain? If both exist, how do they interact? If not, how does one explain certain mental states without the mind?”.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes gives three arguments to try and make himself believe that all his thoughts, beliefs and previous knowledge is nonexistent or has no value. He is trying to convince himself that he knows nothing. I think this is a rather difficult task to perform considering that no matter what you try to do to convince yourself of something you will always go back to your old thoughts and beliefs. It is just how our minds work.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is when he decides to become more self-aware – the Third Meditation. Here Descartes attempts to regard all images of bodily things as “vacuous, false, and worthless” (Descartes, 87). He decides to attempt this because he believes it will allow him to come to a more intimate understanding of himself which leads to his famously misrepresented phrase “I am a thing that thinks” (Descartes, 87). By this statement Descartes means to say that he is a thing that exists and has some form of thought – experiences doubt, denial, affirmations, understands a few things and remains ignorant of others, has the ability to experience the senses and imagination, and has willingness for some things while maintaining an unwillingness for others. This, however, brings in to question how these modes appear in the mind – they must come from some external source, these ideas came from something,…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Morath 11/15/2017 Philosophy of Mind 330 Prof. Jon Stoltz A Non-Reductive Blunder David Chalmers’ attempt to preserve and embrace the mystery of consciousness in his book “The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory” runs contrary to Smart’s Identity Theory of Mind presented in “Sensations and Brain Processes.” This preservation and non-reductive view of mind is, in theory, important to conserving positive phenomenal interactions in the mind, but fails to do so.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Mind and Body Descartes believes in the separation of mind and body. He believes the mind and body are two individual objects. Descartes believes in the substance dualism of our mind and bodies. There are many reasons that support the mind and body could be connected.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1640 Descartes published his famous Meditations on First Philosophy through which he shared his personal reflections on the separation of physical and intellectual realities. By demonstrating the distinctions between imagination and understanding, Descartes is able to declare the mind separate from the body. Through logical deduction, Descartes makes a case for the presence of a higher, heavenly power. With new information from modern science, society contradicts his initial comprehension of mental and physical truths. Using the example of the wax, Descartes argues that the body’s senses fail the mind.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this age, because we are locked to the laws of our physical world, we have no way of proving the mind continues without the body. Furthermore, what would be contained in our minds that didn’t begin with our senses? Releasing himself from a solipsistic mental process, Descartes finds for himself that he exists, here physically. Also, in complete darkness with no feeling, he knows his mind can continue separate from the physical world. Thus, while existing in a body the mind can function independent of the senses.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These Meditations that Descartes created illustrate how he was able to tear down what he had previously thought to be real, and then reconstruct it so that he knew for sure it was correct. However, for this essay I will only be focusing on his first Meditation. Descartes first started thinking about his life in 1619 when he was stranded near the river during bad weather. In his shelter he was engaged in intense philosophical speculations and when he fell asleep he had had three vivid dreams that…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A material thing,which is defined as something that has matter, cannot be moved by an immaterial thing, which is defined as something that does not have matter. The reasoning behind this is the laws of physics which do not allow something without matter to move something with matter. The body, which is a material substance, is moved by the mind, which is an immaterial substance.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance Dualism Analysis

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In another word, the interaction between mind and body should not be a problem, because people who believe mind and body as a whole did not adopt substance dualism. Here, Descartes offers no convincing account for the interaction of mind and body, instead, he just argues people who question his theory are “never philosophize.”(18) Speaking for myself, Descartes’ substance dualism fail to explain the mind and the body interaction and his supplementary explanation even worse the reliability of his theory. Because his argument essentially implied that in order to make people believe in something is simply through believing it.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Senses Challenge

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many are fooled by optical or auditory illusions, such as those in the challenge, as their brain misinterprets what they sense. Our sensation is the stimulation of our sensory organs (Gilbert, Nock, Schacter, Wegner 131). We use this to make perceptions in which we interpret our sensations using receptors, in order to understand what is being sensed. These sensory receptors communicate with the Central Nervous System (CNS), however, through a process called transduction. Transduction occurs when the information that we get from our sensory organs is transformed into neural impulses to send to the brain.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout history, philosophers have been setting up plenty of theories to determine if the mind and the body are one. Substance dualism is one of those theories. Specifically, Descartes is a dualist who brings up the indivisibility argument about the mind that has been trusted until science is well developed. Even though Descartes’ argument is well-accepted, it is not strongly supported by factual evidence, and it is easily defeated by a simple question, which is how the mind and the body interact if they are distinctly separate. Substance dualism is a theory that claims that the mind and the body are not the same one because they are made up from different substances.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Wax Paradox

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes uses his reflection on the piece of wax as a way to argue what our senses and imagination lack. Descartes’ argument is that our senses and imagination lack the ability to grasp the extendibility, flexibility, and changeability of wax, specifically in his explanation, but more generally any body “we touch and see” (30). Ones intellect is the only thing that can perceive the nature of a body, such as the wax. The observation of the wax from the original state to the state after being placed near the fire brings up the question “But does the same wax remain”(30). Descartes knows that the senses cannot distinguish that the two different states of the wax are the same wax, “Evidently none of the features which I arrived at by means of the senses: for whatever came under taste, smell, sight, touch or hearing has now altered- yet the wax remains”(30).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He creates this way of thinking that senses can change over different phases and ideas cannot just disappear from our minds. He is right about the fact of changing the matter of an object and still having that idea of what that particular object was before it was changed is from your mind. He gives valid reasons, however he has many weaknesses to his argument. In the textbook, Classical Philosophical Questions, Descartes says that “…if an idea is “clear” if its content includes the nature and essence of it” (195).…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays