Descartes Indivisibility Argument For Mind/Body Dualism

Improved Essays
I will analyze Descartes’ Indivisibility Argument for Mind/Body Dualism. Descartes’ argument is deductively valid and deductively sound since all premises support the conclusion therefor all of the premises are true. I validate Descartes’ Indivisibility Argument for Mind/Body Dualism by using each premise in the argument and how each premise is a strong back bone why the conclusion is true. Also having awareness of the other side of the argument and using strong counter arguments to build up an influential and powerful argument from my view of things. Thru out the essay will clarify each premise on how the premise support the truth of the conclusion. Also using evidence to explain why some of the premises are actually true and why this argument …show more content…
A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound. Premise one “my mind is not spatially divisible” is true because you cannot have two thought processes at the same time. For example, you can’t think about being at home and also living like a million dollar in The Bahamas the mind can only have one thought at a time. The second premise “my body is spatially divisible” is true because body parts can be in different places at the same time. Like I stated before how multiple fingers can in different places and same for your toes. Premise three “the parts of my body, including my brain, are spatially divisible” is true because the brain can in different places like the body can. For example, the frontal lobe is in the front of the brain and the occipital lobe is in brain, but the brain is in different places and have different jobs and the same for the body you have a left leg and a right both is a part of your body, but in different places. The forth premise “identical entities have identical attributes” is true also because each part of your body has spatially divisible attribute. Therefore if one part of your body is spatially divisible then the other part of your body has to be spatially divisible you can have two arms, but it is impossible for both of the arms to be the same. Now the conclusion “my mind is not identical with my body, and my mind is not identical with any part of my body, including my brain” is proven to be true because all of the premise are true. The conclusion basically states that the mind and body is impossible to be identical and have identical attributes because the body is physical and the mind is not physical. To make clearer, the thought inside of your mind is untouchable unlike different parts of your body. Parts of your body such as finger can

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This belief in philosophy that the mind, soul, or conscious is independent from the body is referred to as Cartesian dualism; in other words, if the body dies the mind does not. Trying to distinct the mind from the body has been a topic in philosophy since Rene Descartes, one of the most influential founders. In one of Descartes first essays, the ‘Second Meditation: Of the Human Mind’, he wrote about how he believed that the mind and the body were two separate entities and self is distinct from the body. On the other hand, there are plenty of respected philosophers that believe Descartes’s look on our mind and body is wrong; these people call themselves Anti-Cartesians. Sir Peter Strawson, a very well-known Anti-Cartesian stated, the mind is…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First of Descartes wrote a series of six meditations to try to argue and establish his philosophical views. In this part of my paper I’m going to explain the first, third, and fifth Meditations Descartes has to offer, to give you background on this topic. Though there are other arguments, they don’t apply nor impact the validity of Descartes Ontological Argument. In Descartes first Meditation, Descartes says…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes could delude, or comfort, himself with the Mind-Body dualism. Fortunately, or unfortunately, I cannot. My brain is, therefore I am. In fact, I am what my brain is. Any changes to my brain will change my identity.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will outline two related skeptical arguments made by Montaigne, explicate them, and then provide Descartes response to these arguments, followed by a brief examination to determine which argument hold more persuasive power. I will begin by outlining two arguments presented by Montaigne, and then expand upon them to better explain their meaning and significance. The first argument I will discuss is the seventh argument presented by Montaigne in his work on skepticism, and proceeds as follows; “To judge appearances that we receive from subjects, we would need a judicatory instrument; to verify that instrument, we would need demonstration; to verify the demonstration, an instrument; here we are going round in a circle. Since the senses cannot…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He added that the mental cannot exist outside the body, and the body cannot think (Sober, 2013). However, he did not deny that interactions took place between the two such that, for example, Advil can be used to treat headaches or desires can make the body move (Sober, 2013, p. 204). On the other hand, the Mind/Brain Identity Theory holds that the mind and the brain are one and the same object. Moreover, it claims that mental events can be correlated with physical events in the brain, such that, for example, headaches are a result of specific changes of chemical activity in the brain (Sober, 2013, p.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The argument whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances raises a still on-going debate. In this essay, I proceed to give evidence as to why the Cartesian dualism theory is flawed. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will try to pick his most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning and other philosophers’ viewpoints. Finally, I am going to conclude how Rene Descartes proposes fallacious arguments which object his mind-body problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Minds and bodies do not share all properties in common. Therefore, minds are not identical with…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His argument is that the mind is different from the brain, which would be apart of the body; therefore the mind is also different from the body. He comes to this conclusion through the first and second certainties of the external world…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, upon a closer and more rigorous examination, it is revealed that this argument is not as unsubstantiated as it seems to be. In order to understand how Descartes justifies his assertion, the concept of “clear and distinct idea” needs to be understood. Descartes’ “clear and distinct idea” involves the argument that an idea becomes clear when sharp intellectual perception is applied to it, similar to how a physical object becomes visually clear when sharp visual perception is applied to the physical object. Furthermore, the idea is distinct if it is not only clear but also excludes all other ideas that does not belong to it (Skirry). Thus, Descartes argued that the body is distinct from the mind because, after applying acute intellectual perception, Descartes perceived that the idea of the mind excludes the idea of body and the idea of the body excludes the idea of the mind therefore the mind is separate and different from the body (Skirry).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays