Defense Lawyer Research Paper

Improved Essays
A criminal defense lawyer is a practitioner of the law specializing in defending individuals alleged to have committed a crime or felony. Such attorneys are often referred to as public defenders. The party being accused is called a defendant.

Most defense lawyers begin their career as state prosecutors. When there is a prosecutor, court proceedings don't have a plaintiff, by itself, because the party that brings accusations against the defendant is actually a public outfit. If an entity is sued and have no means to get the services of an attorney, a lawyer will be provided by the state. This rarely happens though because accused entities usually get their own attorney at any rate.

In a court hearing, the defense lawyer will use the law to shed doubt on the case of the prosecutor. While on the other hand, the prosecutor's job is to persuade the jury beyond any reasonable doubt that the defendant is on the wrong side of the law. The defense attorney will not try to prove the innocence of the defendant because the law directs that an accused party is 'innocent until proven guilty.' But if there is an existing evidence that can vindicate a client, the defense attorney must play his cards right. Even as a defense attorney is obligated to stand for the defendant, there are limitations to this. The defense cannot consciously put a witness on the stand to lie deliberately. And he himself cannot intentionally lie in court. And so, he will keep the defendant from telling him if he is guilty or not. Without this information,
…show more content…
This would be applicable if an undisputed truth of guilt is found. In such cases, the defense attorney bargains the plea before hearing of the case starts or sometimes the case is acquitted if the mitigating circumstances will really

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ireland V Brady Summary

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) Facts of the Case: John Leo Brady was arrested, tried and found guilty in a Maryland court for murder. The other man Donald Boblit had a separate trial. During Brady’s trial, he testified that even though he was involved with the robbery that Boblit was the one who committed the murder not him. The lawyer for Brady asked the prosecution to see all Boblit’s statements to get ready for trial but the prosecution withheld one statement in which Boblit admitted to committing the murder. Brady was found guilty by a jury of murder and was given a death sentence.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin with, the defendant has to request for a counsel at their arraignment. The defendant will also have to prove that he cannot financially afford a private attorney (Cohen, 2013). While the individuals' arraignment occurs the first question asked by the judge will be whether or not your represented by an attorney if the answers no they will also ask if you want to be appointed by one (Find law). The judge could choose to appoint an attorney that is present in the courtroom, however the defendant may not have the same attorney throughout the whole case. Other judges may postpone the arraignment until the financial situation of the defendants is investigated (Find…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the United States, the criminal justice system follows two unique diverse models that protect the people. One of these models is the Due Process Model and in this model, the rights of the defendant are equally and fairly treated. Which this process being the main objective of this clause. The second model is the Crime Control Model and in this model strict punishments to the defendant committing the crime be forced but also protecting the individual 's rights as well. Both these models have a different method in which they protect the individuals but have a similar focus.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In that case, defense is provided to the accused on behalf of the government. This was established in Powell v. Alabama (1932) in which 9 black men were accused of raping two white women on a train in Alabama. The defendants were uneducated and poor with little chance of not being convicted. Alabama state law allowed for government appointed attorneys in capital cases (rape was punishable by death at the time), but no lawyer would accept the appointment. An out of state attorney arrived shortly before the trial and, with no time to prepare, the defendants were convicted.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ryan Law Case Defense

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A criminal defense attorney knows and understands the law and utilizes this understanding to help you get a fair trial. Your criminal lawyer draws upon extensive experience with legal rules and standards and builds a defense strategy that makes the best use of these legal considerations. The Ryan Law Firm believes you are innocent until proven guilty, and they are committed to representing you proactively, compassionately, and fairly. Negotiation: A criminal defense…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lauren Coon Case

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarly, if the unchallenged testimony will result in an “incorrect perception” in the jury’s mind, evidence of prior charges may be admissible. Reed v. Texas Dept. of Protective and Regulatory Services, No. 05-99-01529-CV, 2002 WL 244488 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 21, 2002, no pet.) (holding that the defendant in a parental rights termination case “opened the door” to prior criminal charges—not convictions—by testifying that a minor’s family had no problem with the illegal…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It certainly easier to defend an individual of a crime. However, with that being said it is much harder to defend someone that has committed a horrible action also known as crime. Everyone in the court often take the defendant's side, due to the fact that it is hard to defend a criminal in the first the place. As a result is a harder job goes to the defense attorney. The prosecutor essentially represent the state and they make the decision of bringing the charges against the criminal; however, they do…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining brings to light the unreciprocated power that the prosecutor has due to the nature of the criminal justice system in America. Plea Deals Demonstrate Prosecutorial Power…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the accused agrees to plead to a lesser charge, for example manslaughter versus murder, is called charge bargaining.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas of Defense Attorneys Defense attorneys have to face the ethical dilemma every day of whether or not to defend their client as well as whether or not to maintain that lawyer-client privilege. The lawyer-client privilege provides a security blanket for the client. Under this privilege, the client can almost tell the lawyer just about anything in confidence and not have to worry about the possible fear of being judged or incriminating themselves. A defense attorney serves as a guide that you can basically tell all your deepest darkest secrets to. However, some of those secrets may not always be able to be kept confidential, so be careful about what secrets you share.…

    • 3179 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are responsible for filing lawsuits, gathering all the evidence that is required, meeting with the client and conduct the necessary legal research. They will also argue motions and file to defend their client. All this work is done way before the case will go to court and the attorneys will try and settle out of court. If it looks as if the case will be going to trial then the litigation lawyers will prepare the client and witnesses.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Sixth Amendment guarantees every criminal defendant the right to a competent layers” (p.389) whether that be a public defender or a private attorney. A public defender is a layer who is employed at the publics expense to represent defendants who are unable to afford legal assistance. Many would assume that public defenders do not not provide effective representation like a private attorney would, but that is simply a common misconception. People assume that because someone is paying a “private attorney” to defend them that their getting the best representation, but that is not always true.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just Justice Fair

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Now if you are fortunate enough to be able to afford a higher cost lawyer that doesn’t necessarily mean that are better prepared to defend you. Though public defenders may seem less experienced overall, they may actually be more experienced when it comes to actual criminal cases. Remember those caseloads? All of those cases in a short period of time means that the Public defenders while on the job went through way more criminal cases than a lawyer who simply practiced family law. This point may come across as valid, but once again the evidence is circumstantial and therefore cannot determine that the entire judicial system is defunct because of…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since most defendants can’t afford to pay for a lawyer, they are appointed lawyers who are incapable of properly defending the accused, or unwilling to do so. Subpar defense was certainly of paramount importance in the case of In Cold Blood. Some people in In Cold Blood believed the trial was unfair, “for no real defense had been prepared or offered by them, and this lack of effort, it was implied, had been deliberate - an act of collusion between the defense and the prosecution. ”(Capote, 326). While it was clear that Dick and Perry were tried biasedly and with a very lacking defense, the outcome of the case remained the same.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The prosecutors are considered to be the most influential actors within the courthouse, as they decide which case to prosecute, the cases to plea-bargain, and the case to try. The prosecutor may also influence the factors of setting bail and creating the sentence. In the United States Constitution, one’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is granted as many defendants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, they are provided a public defender also known as the defense attorney. The defense attorneys encourage their clients to think about how the jury will assess them as guilty beyond reasonable doubt, therefore most will plead guilt. The judge plays a major authority role in the criminal justice system whether it is in state courts, or larger courts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays