David Hume's Natural Empiricism

Improved Essays
David Hume, a philosopher from the eighteenth century, is best known for his philosophy of empiricist naturalism, an evolution of the ideas originally conceived by the philosopher Locke. With his philosophy, Hume aspired to "do for human nature what Isaac Newton did for nonhuman nature" (Melchart 395), and to explain the intricacies of human nature in an understandable way. The beginning of natural empiricist thought comes from Hume's division of our experiences with the world into two categories, impressions and ideas. Impressions, Hume writes, are "those perceptions, which enter with most force and violence" (qtd. in Melchart 397), referring to perceptions one senses immediately, such as the sun on a warm day, or perhaps the feeling of being …show more content…
Instead, Hume falls back on his earlier analysis of the idea of causes, asking himself what causes humans to behave in certain ways, if anything. In this way, Hume identifies several constant conjunctions with human behavior, based on his analysis of the behaviors of himself and others. But, Hume argues, "We cannot surely mean, that actions have so little connexion with motives, inclinations, and circumstances, that one does not follow with a certain degree of uniformity from the other," (qtd. in Melchart 410). By this, Hume means that these patterns of behaviour are not indicitive of a lack of liberty, but that all people have the power to act as they will, only falling into certain patterns based on common interests. Thus, Hume concludes, free will is compatible with naturalist philosophy. Hume's philosophy of natural empiricism is an interesting adaptation to Locke's ideas on empiricism, combining the ideas of contemporary science and classical philosophical viewpoints. With both significant supportors and outspoken critics, Hume's philosophical contributions have definitely had considerable

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    He feels as if there was no “constant”, but instead, a casual contact among perceptions. Locke, however, feels that consciousness is what ties together the mind and body In conclusion, both John Locke and David Hume had interesting ideas on self-identity. While still having credible observations, I feel that Hume, in not accepting anything more than a bundle of impressions, left out much of the human experience, such that when the human is studied solely on a scientific level, without thought to his emotional being, much is left out and misunderstood.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also claims that every detail of intelligence that we have an understanding of is within animals, then proceeds to argue that it is more logical to view intelligence not as the originating cause of conflict order, but as a resulted cause. Hume believes that intelligence is not the beginning cause, but it is the blind, uncaring forces of nature that contributes to cause. A law implies a law creator, without a law creator, the law is meaningless and cannot accomplish anything to where Hume…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The mind and body are entities whose characteristics are strictly exclusive, yet together, they form a relationship that is the basis of the existence of humankind – and, by consequence, is one of the most classic and debated dualisms in philosophy. This dualism is described as the mind-body problem. The mind indicates one’s mental faculties such as thoughts, emotions and sensations, while the body indicates the physical processes and entities that allow one to function physically. While both are essential to human existence, the nature of this relationship is heavily debated. The Philosopher René Descartes proposed thoughts on the mind-body concept that support physicalism, the belief that everything can be reduced to physical states: the concepts with which Gilbert Ryle famously refuted and disproved with his “category-mistake” theory.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Copy Principle: Prompt One David Hume, in the book, “An Enquiry of Human Understanding,” denies the thought that ideas are innate or come from within us. Instead, he claims that all ideas, when they are first experienced are derived or duplicated from simple impressions or world experiences. This is known as Hume’s Copy Principle. To prove his hypothesis, Hume divides his argument into two sections.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Prompt # 5 One of John Locke’s purposes in, “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,” is to establish a clear distinction between primary and secondary qualities that are perceived in bodies. To prove this, Locke argues that primary qualities are solidity, extension, figure, rest, motion and inhere in a body. Then, he proposes that secondary qualities are color, tastes, sounds, and smells that are separable from a body and are rather powers to produce sensations in us by the use of their primary qualities. Therefore, primary qualities inhere in objects and secondary qualities are dependent on them. Locke, effectively delivers this argument by presenting various scenarios that prove to be a challenge to the existence of secondary qualities…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume’s Argument for the Belief in Uniformity of Nature Hume begins section seven of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by expanding on his definitions he introduced in previous sections. In this section, on the idea of necessary connection,…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As mentioned previously, Hume believes that all ideas and concepts come from previous experience. Every idea from the simplest to the most complex that us humans have had, or are going to have in our lifetime, can all be traced back to and fuelled down to our impressions, or experiences with our inner and outer senses. On the contrary, if we cannot trace an idea back to its origins, then the idea should be discarded and rejected as meaningless. Hume’s Copy Principle requires one to understand the difference between simple and complex ideas as well as the difference between ideas and impressions. David Hume defines simple ideas as those made up of simple or one identity and cannot be further broken down into more basic concepts.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before bringing Hume into the picture, it is important to first examine how scientific findings like Zaki et al. ’s rely on faith: Zaki et al. must believe the findings from previous papers regarding the functions of the neural regions, namely orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens, to assess their data and to come up with their explanation. Upon closer evaluation, it becomes evident that Zaki et al.’s conclusions rely on testimonies reported by others, which is coincidentally a topic vividly explored by Hume.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their writings, Descartes and Berkeley argue the nature of sensible objects. Sensible objects are what are perceivable to the mind. The nature of how these objects are perceived and if, what the mind perceives exists is the foundation of both Descartes and Berkeley’s arguments. Are sensible objects distinctly external matter that are perceived by the mind, or are they created within the distinct mind and perceived directly. The arguments are related to Descartes and Berkeley’s different stances on rationalism and empiricism, or if our minds identify knowledge of sensible objects through experience or innate knowledge.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was one of the first to try to develop a theory of philosophy of mind, and he especially focused on personal identity. Hume believed that self was just a fiction that we have created to describe our impression and perception (526). In order to make it more clear, we have to go Hume’s problem of induction. Hume focuses in on cause and effect in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. He succinctly states “…That causes and effect are discoverable, not by reason but by experience…”(543).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He explains that, “…I may venture to affirm … that persons are nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in perpetual flux and movement.” Therefore, when we look at who we are, we simply remember our past experiences that shaped us and the impressions they instilled in us. These perceptions change as we grow, and create a new perception of ourselves with each new experience. So how can we have a single persisting “self” when our impressions are what make us who we are, and they are always changing? Hume’s answer to this question is simple,…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume once said, “ Reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions.” He wrote this in his book Treatise on Human Nature. Hume was obsessed with learning about how people obtain knowledge. The answer is quite simple, through experience. We all entered this world as an infant; we had to learn what behavior was expected of us and what we were expected to give in return all through experience.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin’s findings had vital contribution to the development of modern science. Some of their discoveries are still applicable in the contemporary world. Newton did experiments to prove significant laws and principles of force and motion in physical science, while Darwin suggested a lot of processes that indicate the diversity of life of different species. Limitations of sense experience exist when both Newton and Darwin work on their findings, as sense experience involves subjective perspectives of individuals. However, both of them managed to overcome these limitations, so increasing the objectivity of these findings.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays