Darcy is more composed and cultured. In addition, Mr. and Mrs. Bennet have a much more affectionate relationship than portrayed in the book. Their disproportionate match is emphasized in Austen’s novel, where as Mrs. Bennet is much more agreeable in the movie, and she and her husband seem to be a more tolerable match. Their home Longbourn is run down, and they are portrayed to be poorer. Despite many radical differences, the 2005 version of Pride and Prejudice offered a beautiful visual experience. The film’s cinematography gracefully conveyed emotions and themes. There were beautiful moments, such as the portrayal of passing time as Elizabeth slowly spun around on a swing, watching seasons progress. Slow motion captured white cloth floating and rippling as it delicately canvassed Netherfield’s elegant furniture. Melancholy piano music added a sentimental touch and a sense of yearning to the overall mood. The movie nicely complimented Austen’s much more elaborate
Darcy is more composed and cultured. In addition, Mr. and Mrs. Bennet have a much more affectionate relationship than portrayed in the book. Their disproportionate match is emphasized in Austen’s novel, where as Mrs. Bennet is much more agreeable in the movie, and she and her husband seem to be a more tolerable match. Their home Longbourn is run down, and they are portrayed to be poorer. Despite many radical differences, the 2005 version of Pride and Prejudice offered a beautiful visual experience. The film’s cinematography gracefully conveyed emotions and themes. There were beautiful moments, such as the portrayal of passing time as Elizabeth slowly spun around on a swing, watching seasons progress. Slow motion captured white cloth floating and rippling as it delicately canvassed Netherfield’s elegant furniture. Melancholy piano music added a sentimental touch and a sense of yearning to the overall mood. The movie nicely complimented Austen’s much more elaborate