Hegel Master And Slave Analysis

Everyone has qualities that are known to him when others recognize them. When two people meet, each other is quite certain of themselves but not the other. When the two consciences clash in a struggle of prestige each seeks to have other bow before him and admit its value without disputing. It is in this prestige struggle that we see the winner and the defeated one. The winner becomes the master and the defeated the slave. It is in such a situation that Hegel mentioned his famous assertion of “master -slave -dialectic.” Being defeated the slave will follow the master’s instruction. What is Hegel’s point of view on the master-slave dialectic? what is the role of everyone at the end of this recognition between master and slave? And how other philosophe interprets Hegel’s “master and slave dialectic.” …show more content…
Then, how everyone wants his person to be recognized by other individual as being a free person. This encounter begins with a conflict and progressively. Both adversaries seek the desire for recognition ,and each one considers the other individual different from I as a strange object. Each person lives to refold on oneself because people tend to desire for recognition as being free. To be recognized by other and that he deserves respect from him, the two consciences lead a struggle that goes to death or even bloody at the risk of one of them can lose his