Criminal Investigation Process

Superior Essays
Discovery

Introduction
Discovery is the pretrial process in a lawsuit whereby each party is given the opportunity to employ civil procedure in order to obtain evidence that it deems pertinent to its arguments in the case. Litigation is meant to be a fair process in which every party that is before the court is given the best possible chance to defend their arguments by the use of evidence. In civil law, discovery is employed to help even the ground during trial and to ensure that as much as possible, justice is served, additionally, discovery gives both parties the time to obtain relevant facts through the discovery tools and procedure so that when they appear before the court of law they are ready to proceed thus saving time and avoiding
…show more content…
This is usually true for several military cases that are tried in civilian courts due to the nature of events. Whereas the military attorneys can get full discovery to the evidence and documents of the civilian lawyers, the civilian lawyers may not get access to certain pertinent military documents that may be categorized as classified. The same applies to documents and individuals to which sensitive data such as unpatented prototypes found and those pertaining to witness protection or covered by attorney-client privilege among other types of privileged …show more content…
Discovery of documents involves making known or disclosing to the other part every relevant document that can be used to prove or disprove material facts. This means that the documents must be described and made available to the parties for examination. In examination for discovery, the parties in the case (lawyers) meet and ask each other a series of questions aimed at extracting important information. Interrogatories are questions that are written out and given to the other party who must also respond in writing; their use in a court of law must be done only with leave of the court. Pre-trial examination of witnesses is often conducted when there is a person who was not a part of the action but has pertinent information on the case at hand and can only be used with leave of the court. Notices to admit allow the parties to ask one another the truth regarding certain facts. It is important to note that only facts can be admitted and not opinions, or matters of law. Last but not least, as part of discovery, physical and mental examination of a party to the case may be allowed by the court at its discretion (Supremecourtbc.ca,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Court ultimately decided that the notes could not be handed over under the protection of the attorney – client privilege. The justices reminded the Court that the attorney – client privilege was put into place to encourage complete and truthful communication between attorneys and their clients. The…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    An expansion of the exclusionary standard set up in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920). This doctrine holds that evidence gathered with the assistance of illegally obtained information must be excluded from trial. In this manner, if an unlawful cross examination prompts the discovery of physical proof, both the cross examination and the physical confirmation may be barred, the cross examination in view of the exclusionary principle, and the physical proof in light of the fact that it is the "organic product" of the illicit cross examination. This regulation is liable to three of essential special cases. The proof won't be avoided…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lauren Coon Case

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (not designated for publication) (finding that counsel’s cross-examination question about defendant’s reputation for honesty on the job opened the door to prior felony convictions but did not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The right to a fair trial is a part of the due process clause. Including evidence that is inadmissible to court or concealing evidence can result in an unjust conviction. It is imperative that prosecutors include all evidence including “exculpatory evidence, (which is evidence that exonerates the defendant of guilt) under Brady v. Maryland” (Cassel, 2004) and disregard evidence that is prohibited. Former United States Circuit judge Alex Kozinski declares, “there are countless ways in which prosecutors can tamper with the fact-finding process and undermine a defendant’s right to a fair trial. This, of course, is not their job” (Kozinski, 2015,…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The matter of contention present with respect to the disclosure of evidence is conspicuous when considering the notion of full disclosure itself. The concept of fully sharing evidence…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Al Quade Pros And Cons

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moussaoui Issue: When the government asserts an evidentiary privilege in a criminal prosecution, may the court order the prosecution to choose between disclosing the information or having the indictment dismissed? Rule: When the government asserts an evidentiary privilege in a criminal prosecution, the court may order the prosecution to choose between disclosing the information or having the indictment dismissed. 1. Is the classified information Procedures Act (CIPA) which governs discovery criminal defendants have a right to receive certain information such as the information that the prosecution is using against the defendant.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It guarantees a speedy, public trial by an impartial jury in the area where the crime was committed. The defendant must be able to question the accusers and to force favorable witnesses to testify. The accused has a right to a lawyer. In 1932, a landmark case of Powell v. Alabama was decided.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1- First of all, we have to meet our client- the plaintiff- to review carefully the documents and then to see if there is a likelihood of success on the merits or not. According to the facts in the case, we would advise the plaintiff to bring the litigation based on the breach of commercial contract in the US in New York federal court because this is in the best interest of the client and for several reasons we will state latter. In addition, we have to explain both the pros and cons for bringing a case to state or federal court and how the system works there, as long as the contract does not state a litigation country or a court. First, the appeal in state court is 30 days while in federal is 60 days.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Cousin Vinny Analysis

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, Vinny accredited this to his superb persuasion skills rather than the fact that it is required for the opposing party to share relevant facts concerning the case. This is due to the 1963 Supreme Court Case Brady v. Maryland, which ruled that Due Process requires defendants to be given any exculpatory information, commonly referred to an “open file” policy. Discovery refers to the entitlement each party has to receive information that the opposing side has in possession, thus preventing surprises in court. An example of this was when the D.A. called his own expert witness in automobiles and Vinny was not aware, yet the judge allowed it. Additionally, My Cousin Vinny was accurate in representing both the prosecution and defense's closing arguments, which refers to the fact that no more evidence will be presented because both sides have finished arguing.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    B. Opening Statements Opening statements permit both the prosecutor and defense attorney the opportunity to present their interpretation of the events; these statements typically are summarized and do not include witnesses or evidence. However, the prosecutor composes the opening statement initially because the Government has the burden of proving the respondent perpetrated the crime. (United States Attorneys, 2015) C. Presentment of Cases Witness Examination Subsequent to the opening statements, the prosecutor initiates direct examination of the first of the witnesses; this is the prosecutor’s initial step in attempting to prove the case, and the duration may possibly be from a few minutes to several days. Throughout direct examination,…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Opening statements are when the prosecution and the defense each outline their case (Lippmann, 2014, p.533). I next witnessed the prosecution present a Case-in-Chief. The Case-in-Chief is where the prosecutor has the burden of proving every element of the crime and in an effort to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, may present the direct testimony of witnesses and may introduce documents, scientific tests, and tangible evidence (Lippmann, 2014, p.533). At this point the arresting Fresno PD Officer Brian Twedt was called to the stand for questioning. I then witnessed a Cross-Examination which involves asking the witness questions about his or direct examination (Lippmann, 2014, p.533).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You succinctly explained to your reader why informants should be used to establish probable cause. As you note, the informant needs to be credible and the information garnered from the informant must be accurate. The use of informants is a common practice in criminal investigations. “Oftentimes, informants are key witnesses whose trial testimony is vital to prosecutors seeking to prove a defendant’s guilt” (Saltzburg, 2015). However, its use seems to be a slippery slope for law enforcement and criminal investigators.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Document Review Process

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss the Cost of Document Review and How It Can Affect the Outcome of a Case It is not a stretch to say that high e-discovery cost are a core problem in civil litigation. Because the costs are uncertain, many legal attorneys stay away from e-discovery, yet almost all documents and original records are electronic, and have been for years. The review process, which involves document search and reviews, is the most expensive part of the e-discovery process. For its part, the review process in most projects constitutes between 60% to 80% of the total cost (Losey, 2013).…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In making the decision to accept to case to the Supreme Court, the most crucial factor of consideration is whether the case can shed new light…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For instance, matters of open record might be considered deprived. R. Evid. 201, including pleadings, orders and different papers documented with the court or records of authoritative bodies.” See- Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 688 (ninth Cir. 2001).…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays