Magistrates Court Essay

Improved Essays
Magistrate Report

The magistrates court is where every criminal case is initiated and where most cases are closed. As high as “95% of all criminal cases are dealt with in the magistrates’ court.” (Courts and Tribunals Judiciary) with only the most serious of cases proceeding to the crown court. The main difference between a magistrate’s court and crown court is that the verdict of whether the defendant is seen as guilty or not guilty comes from the assistance of a jury panel.

There are 3 types of cases that are present in a magistrate’s court; summary offences, either-way offences and indictable only cases. A summary offence is a case that does not require the presence of a jury and takes the form of a judge outlining the offence followed
…show more content…
(Davies, Croall and Tyrer’s – Criminal Justice, 2015, p.27) Each of the models focus on the needs of particular individuals and what is seen as the appropriate action for them. There are 2 distinct criminal justice models which appear most commonly throughout the justice system; these are the Crime Control Model and Due Process Model. The crime control model stresses the role of the system in reducing, preventing and curbing crime by prosecuting and punishing those who are guilty of offences … as well as importance of protecting citizens and serving public by crime reduction. (Davies, Croall and Tyrer’s). Hebert Packer stated that the gulf existence between the ‘Due Process Model of criminal administration, with is emphasis on the rights of the individual, and the “crime Control Model”, which sees the regulation of criminal conduct as the most important function of the judicial system. (Cole and Gertz). It is notable that both of these models play a vital role in the organization of the criminal justice system and that they are still evident within the use of magistrates

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Select a crime and then find a suitable case that interests you. Newspapers are a great place to start researching for a case - Mohammed Haddara faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in the committal hearing (a hearing in the local court before the charge is heard in the district court or Supreme Court) over drug possession and vehicle thefts . Identify the court the case would be heard in. Outline the jurisdiction of this court – criminal, civil, original and appellate – This court has been heard in the Melbourne Magistrates court as a committal hearing. The Magistrates court of Victoria is the lowest court in the Victorian system and is a court of summary jurisdiction .…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Magistrate court has one hundred and fifty nine courts with one hundred and fifty nine Chief Magistrates and three hundred and thirty three Magistrates. The Magistrate Court handles civil claims…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Local Trial Courts in Texas There are two types of local trial courts in Texas: Municipal Courts and Justice of Peace Courts. The first type has limited criminal jurisdiction. Municipal Courts are created by Texas Legislature to work at the city level. The amount of courts in each location depends up its population and public needs.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crime control model is less protective of individual rights. The Crime control model is in favor of the idea that individual rights must be put aside for the purpose of maintaining public safety and assumes that sometimes one has to give up ones rights for the benefit of society as a whole. In the crime control model, someone accused of a crime may be allowed to go free after arranging for some type of plea bargain. Due process limits the way the evidence can be found. Sometimes, criminals are released due to some error during the collection of evidence, or any other due process rights.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alabama Courts Essay

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alabama has many different types of courts, judges, districts, and responsibilities inside its jurisdictions. The state is divided into three areas for which its district courts are responsible, which are then further split into divisions. The northern region consists of seven divisions the eastern division, jasper division, middle division, northeastern division, northwestern division, southern division, western division. The middle district includes three divisions eastern division, northern division, and southern division. The Southern District comprises two divisions Mobile Division, Selma Division.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Magistrate courts are lower courts in the hierarchy of courts in England and Wales where all criminal proceedings starts. Some civil matters such as family proceedings are also dealt with by the Magistrates court. While the Magistrate court has limited sentencing powers, more serious crimes such as rape and murder cases are passed on to the Crown court which has more sentencing powers and wide range of punishments. Appeals on cases decided by the crown courts usually go to a high court, court of appeal or the Supreme Court. Cases in the magistrate courts are usually heard by a district Judge or by a bench of magistrates known has lay judges.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Adult Court Case Essay

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. How does waiver to adult court occur? What is the main reason to waive a juvenile to adult court? - Waiver to adult court occurs by according to Taylor R.& Fritsch E. (2011 P. 12), “certification, or transfer, and involves a juvenile court’s relinquishing its jurisdiction over the offender and allowing a juvenile to be sent to adult court for prosecution.” The main reason to waive a juvenile to adult court is if he or she commits a delinquent crime that would have been a crime if committed by an adult and if the prosecutor chooses not to file a petition the prosecutor them has the option to waive the juvenile to criminal justice system for prosecution.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years throughout history, much debate and controversy has been sparked with respect to Canada’s correctional system and criminal justice system. Canada’s criminal justice system has thrived/strived to work as a consolidated unified entity aimed at reducing, maintaining, and preventing crime and criminal activity. However, great controversy remains as to whether or not Canada’s criminal justice system is effective. It can be argued, for example, that Canada’s system of criminal justice is aimed at striving to achieve and meet specified goals, entities, or principles. In terms of sentencing a criminal offender, for example, sentencing can either be based on the principles of crime control or due process.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An out of court disposal is a way of dealing with a criminal offence, through methods which do not require a prosecution in court. Their use is often for low level, first time offences. There are a wide range of out of court disposals, they include (although are not limited to) the cannabis warning, simple caution, youth caution, conditional cautions, conditional discharge and penalty notices for disorder. For an out of court disposal to be given, the offender must admit their guilt and there should be enough evidence to prove that the individual committed the offence. It is also necessary to consider whether the public interest would be served by the using of such disposal.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Punishment for criminal offences is a practice that had been present since the inception of human civilizations across the globe. In ancient times too, people were convicted and punished for committing crimes which encompassed heinous crimes like murder. Though the modes of punishments varied from what are present today, different forms of retribution were thoroughly present in those ancient civilizations. But it must be noted that the entire criminal justice system, today, has changed, and to ensure that no one is unduly punished, the criminal justice systems of different countries across the globe resort to several procedures. Today criminal law has the responsibility to meet several different objectives which ensure that justice is served,…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This court is conducted in an informal manner in which the magistrate is seated at a table. The major goal of such a court is to allow sentencing orders to become more appropriate and understanding toward the background of the…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The conflict and consensus models are two parallel models that work toward furthering the protection of society. The conflict model focuses on preserving the rights of the people while the consensus model focuses on public safety (Cronkhite, 2013). When considering how these two apply to viewing criminal justice as a system it is quite simple. The conflict model creates an urgency to protect the people from harm yet also to preserve individual rights that are guaranteed by the Constitution. If the conflict model is to be applied to criminal justice, then it is important to recognize that laws and policy can be implemented by the criminal justice system to combat crime, while also ensuring that the people do not lose their rights.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This model allows for the criminal justice process to look like an obstacle course consisting of a series of impediments that take the form of procedural safeguards that serve as much to protect the factually innocent as to convict the factually guilty (Zalman, 2008). The due process model emphasizes the need to reform people through rehabilitation. Preferable prison sentences under the model include community-based sentencing…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics