Consequences Of Budget-Making

Improved Essays
one bill, the President decides and acts immediately and effectively too. It seems reasonable, but it is also very dangerous if it leaves masses of bad consequences. Thus, Congress should maintain its lawmaking power to control the executive branch in internal affairs.
The second oversight role of Congress in aiming at presidents in their diplomatic work is budget-making. The American President is the most superlative leader of the global economy, of-course, besides the respect, almost foreign countries expect the U. S's help. Congress stands as the greatest check on the abuse of presidential power to spend a big national fund. One of foreign policies, Congress can react against unreasonable decisions of executive chief by cutting funds. Today,
…show more content…
But, majority of Americans believe that the oversight function of budget-making is very important to balance federal funds even though money transfers are slow.
Lastly, the Founders set up a system of checks and balances in military affairs and gave
Congress a sole right to declare war, this right called war-making in foreign policy making. Basically, the President's obligation is protecting this nation from foreign aggression and at the same time conserving peace around the world. Because the president of the U.S is among the most powerful people in the globe and is Commander in chief of the military, the Congress seized for itself the authority and skillfulness necessary to exercise its full foreign policy oversight powers over the chief executive. According to the textbook, “Together the roles of chief diplomat and commander-in chief enable the president to exercise tremendous power over foreign affairs, greater power than over domestic matters” (338); consequently, Congress should increase in war-making to prevent abusing the powers of the chief executive branch. For instant, Nixon led Congress passed the “War Powers Resolution” to restrict his quality to commit troops to combat in Vietnam (352), or George H.W Bush sent soldiers to invade Panama in1989 before he sent two-page letter to
…show more content…
Since the President is dominant in foreign policy, Congress should play a significant function in this field as well. It is obvious that if the President has the most powerful authority, he might become an autocrat. At that point, those foreign policies will not serve for American interests anymore. Thus, a balance in power for making foreign policy is needed, and Congress is the key to play this essential oversight role. I think that the Founders had reason to believe it too dangerous to give war powers to the president alone. Instead, they gave the power of war-making to Congress. Besides, Congress acts as a check on the president's policies to appropriate all money for carrying out foreign affairs, and Congress needs to make ratification of treaties and trade agreements. Recently, globalization to all parts of the world through the Internet, we aware of the relationship of foreign policy to everyday lives and standard of living. As the head among leaders of countries, the American president must pay attention our problems such as pollution that affect climate change, poverty or country which providing sanctuaries for terrorists for suiting with the head of the world's strongest military and economic

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the time that we are in we need someone to quickly act, and having the president to do it makes the most sense. 2.The most important of the Constitutional powers given to the president in terms of fathering the growth of the president is the power of being our foreign policy…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will address the extensive debate regarding presidential powers and the fact that, though unwise and poor law, the War Powers Resolution is not unconstitutional. In order to determine whether or not the War Powers Resolution intrudes too deeply on standing presidential power, it is first necessary to identify the legitimate executive prerogative that the Congress may have infringed upon. Opponents of the War Powers Resolution make a serious argument on intrusiveness regarding only one executive prerogative, the President's power as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States”, which is said…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One major constitutional relationship that is defined deeply within the author’s argument is the distinct power of U.S foreign policy and whether or not the president or congress should have the ability to declare war (48). Ultimately when the framers constructed the constitution, it named the president the “ commander-in-chief”, however the power to declare war was only available to congress (50). Eventually this struggle among the branches led to the future outcry of who should deal with U.S foreign policy. Also over time presidents began to exert their “ commander-in-chief” duties by sending troops to where they felt necessary and even began wars only to justify that they did so with nation’s interest in mind, all without congressional approval…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Congress oversees the executive power by checking that the laws they have passed are still being administered how they intended them to be. They hold congressional hearings, or investigate and question the wrongdoing if found. The Constitution created oversight to make sure everything continues to move along in the correct manner. Congress is a key component in maintaining the intentions of the country’s legislations. Question 5:…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be argued that the president is not in charge of creating legislation, and that the president is to play a role in foreign relations, and that by giving him, the president, the power of the military, that in itself is an argument made by those that support ratification. However, the power to declare war rests in congress and not the president, in which the president is only in charge of the military when war has been declared. The imbalance of power between the three branches of government is a problem that the constitution creates, but that is not the only problem. The other problem that the constitution creates is that the federal government does not provide specific liberties within itself in which the federal government will protect. Those…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Critics of the president’s power express their discontent at the president gaining power at the expense of Congress. Due to the vagueness of the powers outlined in the Constitution, many fear that the president can just run rampant and do as he wishes. When looking at the overall positives versus the negatives, the benefits of a strong presidency, namely unification of a country under an individual elected by the nation as a whole out, help rather than hinder our…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress itself has given the president powers that it does not constitutionally have, and the constitution is vague in some areas so the president takes advantage of the opportunity. For example, when he deploys troops to war without congressional approval because the constitution says he is the commander in chief. The role of the president has changed from weak to a strong one because he has more powers than the founding fathers intended. Institutional, cultural, and policy changes have altered the role of the Presidency because they caused the president’s power to strengthen and ultimately giving the impression that the president is the most…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the president is able to pass executive orders to change policy, these orders may be defunded by congress, counteracted by congressional legislation, or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In addition, although a president is able to veto legislation, if a president continually vetoes legislation, the public may not look on him/her favorably, which would impact their electability. These factors seem to limit the president’s power greatly; however, so long as the president’s executive order is not unconstitutional, the president still wields remarkable power, as Congress would need a majority opposition in order to defund the president’s executive order. Furthermore, many of the president’s constituents could be swayed if the president were to deliver a speech concerning the necessity of his executive order. The executive branch, being the largest branch in government, requires that the president divides his power among the vice president, department heads, and heads of independent agencies in order to accomplish all of the administration’s tasks.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They are in charge of these things because if the president felt as if that he needed to declare war he can’t because congress is actually in charge of declaring wars on other countries. This backs up my claim because if they were not in charge of the things that they are in charge of then the country could in fact almost de under rule of one person like a king, but that is exactly the thing this country is against, we don’t want just one person to make the laws and all that. Our founding fathers left england because of that exact reason to get their freedom away from a dictator like a king. Why would they leave the dictatorship only to create one that they were trying to get away…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even the President’s check on Congress, a Presidential veto, can then be reversed by a two thirds majority vote in congress. So while the President does have power, in almost every case, that power is limited in one way or…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well before the 20th century, Congress was in charge of the federal government. Only a handful of times did the president actually make decisions or have involvement in the process. Earlier, in the formation of the United States, the president was easily considered “chief clerk”. The increased importance of foreign policy, helped to develop the presidential powers of the 20th century. Since then, the president of the United States of America has grown to become the most powerful position our nation.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It takes a lot to criticize the American people with media being all in their personal life and be ridiculed for every decision you make. As the commander in chief, the president has the power to deploy the Armed Service in war. Congress has struggled with the power of…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays