• Home Page
  • Conflict Over Slavery In The 1930's

Conflict Over Slavery In The 1930's

Decent Essays
Show More
conflict over slavery in the 1850s made a change in the political scene, which caused a lot tension between different parties. abraham lincoln, repuublican politican from illinois, opposed the kansas-nebraska act and his rival stephen a douglas who is also a illinois politicain supported the kansas-nebraska act. it start in the 1840s, milard filmore put a distance wetween himself and southerners when he supported the entry of caifornia as a free state. he then angered northerners by supporting the fugitive slave act and popular sovereignty. he was the last whig president. the unity of the party died with the two great leaders - henry clay and daniel

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    War Came: The Sectional Struggle Over Slavery
    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages

    War Came: The Sectional Struggle Over Slavery

    According to David Herbert Donald in his article, “Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the Territories,” “containment” according to the North meant that in order to ensure slavery did not overtake free states, it must be held only to the locality where it currently operated. The North believe wholly in the “expand or die” philosophy regarding slavery, in conclusion, if slavery were allowed to creep into the new territories of America, it would also reach it's influence to the free states(Donald). For example the Northern free-soilers presumed, “If the extension of slavery could be prevented, they concluded the whole system must collapse”(Donald). Therefore if slavery could be held to the established areas in the South,…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Election Of 1860 Dbq Analysis
    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Election Of 1860 Dbq Analysis

    In the Election of 1860, Douglass had alienated the South and due to Dred Scott, was extremely unpopular. The Democratic party was now split as the Southern Whigs and Know-Nothings, due to this divide, the Republicans had a leg up. Lincoln said that, "The normal condition of all the territories of the United States is that of freedom." (Liberty and Power 420). The nation had four candidates to choose from, which led to such disunion.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Dred Scott Vs Sandford
    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Dred Scott Vs Sandford

    Bleeding America The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    By the 1850s, the two parties system was in crisis because moderate compromises such as the Missouri Compromise in 1820s by the “great pacificator,” Henry Clay of Kentucky could no longer appease both sides’ extreme radicals, as the territories kept getting westward expanded and ordained by the doctrine of Manifest Destiny. (Brands, p.295) The next generation of Congressmen such as Wilmot Proviso’s argument and Lewis Cass’s “Popular Sovereignty” failed to forge compromises over the Republican’s “slave–power conspiracy” and the Democrat’s “southern rights” as the Mexican War drew to a close. (Brands, p. 313) Especially, in January 1854, Senator Stephen Douglas’ introduction of the Kansas-Nebraska Act on the base of “Popular Sovereignty” to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 in order to bring about the railroad to go through his home state in support of expansion and commerce was a major disaster. Accordingly, Douglas’ bill further worsened on the irreconcilable sectional division in his own Democratic Party, gave birth to the new Republican…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Controversy Of The Kansas-Nebraska Act
    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Controversy Of The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    Understand how the controversy of the Kansas-Nebraska Act led to the birth of the modern day Republican Party. The controversy of the Kansas-Nebraska Act that was passed on May 20, 1854, was regarding the practice of popular sovereignty which allowed the white people in the two territories to vote if they desired to allow slavery or abolish slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was introduced by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois who wanted to build a transcontinental railroad through Chicago. However, it violated the Missouri compromise which prohibited the practice of slavery on the Louisiana Purchase north of the latitude 36°30′. With the purpose of increasing votes and winning a majority, the north and south crossed the border into the two territories to vote for or against slavery. The northerners were called Free-Soilers and the southerners were called border ruffians.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Factors That Led Up To The Civil War Dbq
    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Factors That Led Up To The Civil War Dbq

    Politics during the 1850s became heated, especially between Lincoln and Douglas. Document 7 states Douglas’ response to Lincoln in Freeport Illinois. Douglas argues that no matter what the Supreme Court decides about slavery in the territories, the people have the final word in if an area has slavery or not because local police forces enforce the laws on slavery. Lincoln was against slavery, while Douglas was for it, and because they were both presidential candidates, it forced the United States citizens to pick a side, dividing the country more. As the presidential race raged on, people became more violent.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Radical Abolitions
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Radical Abolitions

    The United States in the mid-19th century was as divided as ever. Conflict between anti- slavery North and pro-slavery South arose due to new states forming and whether slavery would be implemented into these new states. There was also division inside these two groups, more specifically, the Anti Slavery North. The Abolitionists were divided into two groups, the Radical Abolitionists, headlined by Frederick Douglas and William Lloyd Garrison, and the Anti-Slavery Republicans, headlined by Abraham Lincoln. The book, The Radical and the Republican, by James Oakes focuses on the impact that Frederick Douglas and Abraham Lincoln had on each other through their different views which led to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Controversy
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Controversy

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil War Dbq

    For the majority of American History leading up to the Civil War, civilians had been divided over the issue of slavery and politics. The nation had a long history of compromise that seemed necessary to keep the nation unified. Most of these compromises avoided the issue of slavery, as politicians and “great compromisers” like Henry Clay aimed to prevent the inevitable split between the North and South. There was a turning point, however, in the North and South, when compromise was no longer an option. Although the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the immediate and final trigger for southern secession, other attributes including the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 drove the South further towards…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Slavery In The Southern Colonies
    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Slavery In The Southern Colonies

    Slavery was a factor that led to the growth of population throughout the colonies. Enslaved Africans worked on plantations while very few did housework. The slave code was laws to regulate enslaved Africans. The strict rules controlled the behavior and punishment of the enslaved Africans. Many colonies had their own slave codes some restricted teaching to read and write most were not allowed to gather in large groups.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay
    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Was The Civil War Avoidable Essay
    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Was The Civil War Avoidable Essay

    Jake (Allen) Primack US History Hour 1 Why the Civil War Was Unavoidable Did you ever think what would have happened if there was no civil war? The fact of the matter is that the civil war wasn 't avoidable because of the disagreement and hate between the North and the South. The important United States politicians each had different views and hopes for the country, which made it hard to reach a compromise without war.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Rise Of Slavery During The Antebellum Era
    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Rise Of Slavery During The Antebellum Era

    The United States has not always lived up to its ideals of unity and coexistence amongst its constituent states. This was the case during the Antebellum era, in which the nation was exsanguinated by the wounds of division as the Northern and Southern states had a tense interaction. The catalyst behind this tension was the topic of slavery. By looking at a map showing the expansion of emancipation in the country, it is obvious that the Northern states have been getting rid of slavery since the 1700s, either by state constitution or by state law. In contrast, slavery had been a part of Southern economy and life.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Manifest Destiny Civil War
    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Manifest Destiny Civil War

    All three men passed away two to three years after the “Compromise of 1850” and no one took a stand to be the voice of reason in the country. Southern economy as it is agricultural became more dependent on slavery while the North more diverse economics and did not rely on slavery. The Kansas bill in 1854 declared that any state out of the Nebraska territory would enter the union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of their admission. The implanted Popular Sovereignty and resulted in destroying the Whigs party, planting irreconcilable divisions in the democrat party, creating two new parties, the Know-Nothings and the…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    Both Kansas and Nebraska mounted in cross-border acts of violence over the terms of slavery. As a result of the Kansas-Nebraska act, the conflict was a main point of argument the North had on the continuation of slavery in the West. The conflict between the North and the South’s rhetoric behind slavery caused them much tension. Abraham Lincoln gave a campaign speech referring to the Democrats as bushwhackers and informants of false information that cannot be justified (E). Since the Democratic Party inhabited much of the southern lands of the United States, this perception of the Democrats similarly denounced the ideals of the south.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings