Comparison Of Social Darwinism And The Eugenics Movement

Social Darwinism and the Eugenics Movement
Social Darwinism is the belief of natural selection that applies to social organizations and to individuals in society. The ones who were better suited would be well developed while those that were poorly adapted would suffer, this was Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism was created in the late nineteenth century. It was a highly developed movement that was involved with the theory of evolution. However, the theory was mainly based from the work of Charles Darwin, especially his book called “Origin of Species”. Herbert Spencer, the father and inventor of social Darwinism, was the one to publish his ideas before Darwin had published his. Herbert Spencer believed that unfit people in society who were the poor, disabled, and elderly shouldn't be given aid by private or public charities.
Eugenics was believed to be the study and science of attempting to select people of superior society with specific traits especially the breeding of humans for improvement of social control but at a genetic level. Most people believed that particular traits were transmitted by genes. It is also an idea which came directly from Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism and Eugenics are both related because they both meant that being different was not allowed in society …show more content…
There were no proven treatments for the disease when the study first started. Researchers told the participating men that they had "bad blood’’ and was going to be treated for it. This was a term that was continuously used to describe many illnesses. The men were not told correctly what they were there for or the purpose of the study. They were not told that they had syphilis either, so that meant they must have been tested without consent, which was a