Comparing Socrates And Thoreau

Improved Essays
Socrates and Henry Thoreau were great philosophers for their time. They were both opposed to a democratic government and share similar and dissimilar opinions on the subject. Unnecessary. As Thoreau put it: “When the power is once in the hands of the people… to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right… but because they are physically the strongest.” These statements by Socrates support Thoreau’s: “Those with the highest reputation are the most deficient” and “it is likely that neither of us knows anything worthwhile, but he thinks he knows something when he does not.” Essentially, Socrates is saying that in a democracy, an opinion is garnered from a collective of people. These people may not necessarily have an expertise

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Transcendentalism was a movement in mid-nineteenth century America that focused on an individual obtaining personal freedom from the constrictions of their surrounding society. Thus, it can be said that they pushed for social and political change to be achieved so that individualism would be prized over collectivism. Two writers, Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson, are at the frontline of these Transcendentalist views. These authors introduce a similar twist to the concept of personal freedom, claiming that a person can achieve it by encompassing oneself into nature.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, an American philospher and naturalist once stated that "The price of anything is the amount of time you exchange for it. " I have to say that I agree with Thoreau's statement and I have proof to show you why. Let's take the work enviroment for example. If you have a job where you get paid by the hour, you can get paid for doing overtime. Depending on how much extra time you put in, the cost measures.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The tone in Thoreau’s second is very critical and harsh. He makes it very obvious that he hates the U.S. Government. He uses diverse theories to show his tone. The first is he has well-adjusted sentences.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay Thoreau or Gandhi- Who makes the better point? In 1849 Henry David Thoreau wrote about the need for change in the U.S. Government in his essay titled “Civil Disobedience”. Thoreau wrote this because he saw fault in his government that took his tax dollars, yet did not oppose the “political and moral evil” of slavery. Likewise, in 1916 Mahatma Gandhi wrote “On Civil Disobedience” after having been beaten and jailed for what he calls “arbitrary laws” in South Africa.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During times of political turmoil, very few ever had the courage to face the injustice. Courage such as that is few and far between. Two of these outliers were Henry Thoreau and Martin Luther King. Henry Thoreau was an American writer and poet who lived from 1817 to 1862. He was the author of numerous articles, including On the Duty of Civil Disobedience.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frederick Douglass differs from H. D. Thoreau in the sense that he doesn’t believe that all government is oppressive and manipulative. When it came to the issue of slavery, an injustice recognized by most, Douglass felt true in his convictions to do whatever possible to end such an inequality. He may have changed his opinion on the Constitution around 1851 once the issue of slavery became more of a prejudice than an oppressive institution centered around injustice towards people’s senses of equality and freedom. He clearly understood there to be a time for rebellion to the current system in place if everything isn’t reflective of the principles set out in the Declaration of Independence and the preamble of the Constitution. “It shall not avail that the Constitution and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau, however is not so optimistic. He believes that what ever happens in Atlanta does not affect other people or in that matter another city that has nothing to do with it. He also believes that one person's vote or participation can make a difference. Thoreau holds that majority and nothing can change that.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is in our human nature to fight for what we believe to be right, and we do so in different ways; Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. both were empowering men who had their similarities and differences; but what exactly? Henry David Thoreau was a man who took a stand by refusing to pay his poll tax, being imprisoned due to it, and writing books and essays, his most famous being, Walden: or Life in the Woods, which greatly encouraged people to live simpler, and On the Duty of Civil Disobedience , which presented his views on taxes, slavery, and the Mexican-American War. According to the “Glossary of Nonviolence” from The King Center, civil disobedience is “The act of openly disobeying an unjust immoral or unconstitutional law as…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau was a simple man, one who decided that living on his own in the woods was the only way to reach clarity. His philosophy is one that has changed the way that many people have looked at themselves and their place in society. However his society is a thing of the past. His society is one that had different values and norms. Stating that possessions create complication is obsolete, although his ideas are very relevant in terms of obsession, society has created a way for people to connect with the world around them and live fuller lives.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anyone can recognize when a law is unjust - but can they be brave enough to face the consequences if they choose to protest that law? Should they? Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” critiques that citizens must protest a law that is unjust, and his own experiences and methods for protest, and Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” where he speaks of his approach to protesting against unjust laws, even if it lands him in jail. Both philosophers regarding on their answers on this question shows that they are both willing to protest and face the consequences for it, but they differ in their ideas of solutions. King’s perspective on breaking unjust laws is that it is necessary to do it to give an oppressed group the opportunity…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both great literary figures in the United States, yet they lived in different time periods. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and King’s Letter to Birmingham Jail”are quite similar, in addition obtain certain differences between the texts. Both writers demonstrate each other 's audience on ways of being civilly disobedient towards their corrupt government and how to have a relationship with them. On the other hand, certain differences, both texts possess are whom it was addressed to as well as the occasions and appeal. Both texts fractions in similarities and differences through their analysis, such as occasion, strategies used, and other figures used in their writings.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Transcendentalism is an idealistic approach to identity, nature, humanity, and divinity. The themes derived from Emerson and Thoreau center on this transcendental view of self-reliance and nature. In Thoreau’s Walden, he uses key points Emerson shows in Self-Reliance. The two men carry a great influential impact on society showing ideas of non-conformity, infancy, identity, the meaning of self-reliance, and an overall connection to nature. Emerson and Thoreau teach what purpose nature has to several aspects widely known in society.…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy, by definition, is a system of government by the people for the people. Socrates’s aristocracy aims to govern by for the people, but gives the power of governing into the hands of the philosopher kings. Both systems of government have the same goal, however Socrates criticizes democracy because he thinks that most ordinary people (craftsmen) do not have the knowledge to govern themselves, and the excessive desire for freedom and other appetites can be unnecessary (557e, 559b-c). That is why the rulers in his kallipolis, the kings of philosophy, should govern because they make rational decisions that are advantageous to the city and the people. Again, is that…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato: As I mentioned earlier, I do not think democracy is a good form of government, and neither is tyranny. Rousseau: Least favorable would be a democratic government. Plato, is the only reason why you think democracy is a bad form of government because of the death of Socrates?…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays