Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
(3.2.16) Mark Antony proved to the crowd with logos- factual evidence- that killing Caesar just because he was ambitious was an awful case. Antony also gives times where Caesar has helped others like the poor. “ When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept…” (3.2.19) Here, he uses another shift change to more of an emotional state (pathos) which lures the audience to Mark Antony’s side. “If any speak; for him I have offended. Who is so rude that would not be a Roman?” (3.2.20-21) Throughout Brutus’ speech, he uses rhetorical questions like this one to give a chance for the crowd to think about the cause of Caesar’s death. Brutus also shows respect to the assembly and let’s them know their words need to be heard as well. As this work of pathos …show more content…
“...Thought he had no hand in his death, shall receive the benefit of his dying..” (3.2.32-33) At this time, Brutus was bringing Rome’s political fate up again, except this time Caesar wasn’t involved. Instead Brutus gave the people an idea of Mark Antony as the new “Caesar.” In response, Mark Antony brought up their past. For instance, when Caesar pushed the crown away three times. Which did he thrice refuse: was this ambition?” (3.2.25) It was a great point to bring up the idea of Mark Antony’s future rule of Rome in Brutus’ speech. Although Antony’s anecdote about the offered crown made the assembly think about their beloved ruler’s death, and don’t want to risk it again. “..I have the same dagger for myself..”(3.2.36) Brutus comes back once again with his true motivation of his nationalism. Here, he shows “his” people the ultimate love for them. This helps the crowd realize that he’s willing to sacrifice himself for the sake of them. “ I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, But here I am to speak what I do know.” (3.2.28-29) Still being mannerly, Antony has heard what Brutus had to say about Caesar, but Antony speaks here to show that no one knows Caesar better than him. This gives Mark Antony more support from the audience because they trust him. “Do grace to Caesar’s corpse, and grace to his speech tending Caesar’s glories.” (3.2.51-52) As Brutus makes room for a final statement used with pathos, Mark Antony was ready to make the last words of his speech hit the crowd with emotion. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” (3.2.34-35) As the speeches closed, an important point to remember is besides the fact that they are opposing to each side while honoring Caesar, together they can be wrong about their judgements of each other. “The third positive virtue of Caesar is his exquisite judgment of human character. We have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first sentence of the paragraph is describing the nature of the surrounding countryside of a plain in central France, using fancy terminology and descriptive language such as “buttressed by purplish mountains on the east, the rolling hill country of central France is both beautiful and strategic.” The author seems to be trying to set up something bigger, and I feel like something of a greater nature is going to come up. Judging by the way that it is worded and the implication of the word “strategic”, it seems that something of which requires tactics on this beautiful flatland is about to be made. Judging by the subtitle, which reads: “Caesar conquered Gaul, but awaiting him was the treacherous Brutus.” , it sounds like these two people -…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    in his funeral speech. With saying this, he is asking the audience who doesn’t love their country enough to make it better. If they did not agree with what Brutus said, it would be believed that they do not truly care for Rome and what would be best for Rome and the people there. By using pathos, Brutus was able to pull on the audience’s emotions to make his speech be more…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony begins his speech by addresses his audience. He refers to them as, “Friends,Roman,Countrymen”( 3.2.131), this articulates that he is bringing himself down to the plebeians level so he can make the crowd feel as though he is their friend even though they are separated by status and rank. This line is an example of pathos because the line is based mostly on emotion or the sympathy and emotion in the audience. This is important to know because as his speech progresses he uses a lot of rhetoric, such as pathos and ethos. Going on he says “ I come to bury Caesar not to praise him” (3.2.121), Antony uses rhetoric and genuine reminders to ultimately portray Caesar in such a positive light so that the crowd enrages at the conspirators.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play, Julius Caesar, everyone sees Antony as a noble man. He speaks at Caesar’s funeral for the “sake” of Brutus, who the crowd refers to as honorable and sincere. By associating himself with Brutus, Antony gains authority. He skillfully persuades a crowd that loves Brutus, that Caesar wasn't ambitious and that Brutus isn’t honorable. By using verbal irony, an anecdote, and imagery which appeals to the audience's emotions, Antony persuades the crowd that Caesar’s death was not reasonable.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine that you are a citizen in Rome, and your ruler, Julius Caesar, just got murdered. Your emotions are everywhere and you are very vulnerable. That's how the people of Rome felt in the play, "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar." The Romans where looking for any type of clarity on why this happened, so both Brutus and Mark Antony delivered speeches. Brutus used the rhetorical devices antithesis, epimone, and logos, while Mark Antony used paralipsis and pathos, to evoke the preferred mob mentality that each one wanted.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar's blood has been shed and is evident all over Brutus as he argues with the townspeople that it was the best thing to do for Rome. Funerals are generally a time of remorse but Brutus cares to show none for what he has done. He persuades the townspeople at Caesar’s funeral and says a speech about how Caesar was too ambitious and would have corrupted Rome to justify his acts. The Roman people are convinced about what Brutus said then get the wrong impression of what his speech is about and suggest Brutus should be the new leader of Rome. Before his speech could continue Marc Antony, a close friend of Caesar, took over and started talking about Caesar.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says, the Noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious, him restating what brutus said made the audience think exactly about Caesar’s actions about what made him “ambitious”. Him saying if Caesar was truly ambitious why did he refuse the crown three times- an ambitious man would’ve accepted the crown with no hesitation. Marc using basic logic to appeal to the townspeople of what the typical ambitious man would do makes the crowd consider if Caesar truly was ambitious or if Brutus was accusing him of being something he wasn’t. Antony says, the evil that men do live after them, that has emotional appeal to the townspeople because it something everyone can relate to, yet he makes it noticed that Caesar was killed for the evils he did. The evils that any citizens could’ve made he was killed for and that shows no fairness to…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, just before doing so he spoke the words that prove his honorable intentions, “Caesar now be still./ I killed not thee with half so good a will”…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Public speeches, no matter the setting, all have a common goal: to persuade or convince everyone in the audience to support the speaker’s point of view. In Act III Scene II of “Julius Caesar,” Brutus and Antony both give funeral speeches for Caesar’s death. Both speeches were very effective in their own respective ways. Both speeches were very well presented. Antony’s speech, was, however, more effective.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After my speech is ended.” (AIII,S 1 L, 255) Speaking at the funeral, Antony goes against the rules that Brutus sets and makes the crowd go against…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays