Neoliberalism Vs Neorealism

Great Essays
If states were able to cooperate, would the world be a better place? What would be the likely hood of all of the state’s cooperating? In this essay, I will present two arguments, which will spell out the neorealist point of view and the neoliberal point of view of international cooperation. The neorealist believe that it would be difficult to have international cooperation because they are worried about having equal distribution of power within states, and being able to trust other states. The neoliberal believes that international cooperation will naturally occur if the state’s will allow it to happen. Neoliberals believe that with absolute gain, which are international actors determining the interest of the state and being optimistic, that …show more content…
If international cooperation were to occur, then there would be a slim chance of the states profiting from one another. Neoliberals do not deny the difficulties of international cooperation, but see the possibilities of states coming together to produce absolute gains and to gain secure security within the states. Neoliberals believe that there is a higher chance of international cooperation occurring because of absolute gains and their optimistic view on each state and international cooperation with one another. Neoliberals are convinced that distribution is not as important than gains potentially occurring. Absolute gains are determined by each state’s interest and figuring out the long-term effects of the state's interest and decisions. Neoliberals are not just considered about the distribution of power, but also the economical and cultural effects of the state's interest. Neoliberals believe that there are more than relative gains, that does not just focus on the individual, but collective ideas that will benefit every state rather than just a …show more content…
Neorealist believe that the chances of international cooperation occurring are low because of their main concern, which is power distribution. Neorealist believe that the states are too greedy to cooperate with one another. Neorealist are focused on anarchy, making sure no one can enforce rules, and setting unitary rational actors, the distribution of power, and their main goal is security and survival. Neoliberals agree with neorealist but believe that international cooperation is possible due to their optimistic view. Neoliberals know that the institutions have it flaws, and if they all work together there will be less flaws. Neorealist and neoliberals both have theories that are similar to one another. Neorealist do not believe there are high chances of international cooperation because of the distribution of power. Neoliberals believe that there will be higher chances of international cooperation because of their optimistic view on the benefits that the states will encounter. In my opinion, neorealist is correct about the power distribution. When looking back over hundreds of years and currently each state want to gain power. Neoliberal theory of international cooperation has stable points, but due to the past and currently, power is more important than every state

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Pros Of Constructivism

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The constructivist turn in IR marks a shift from the material determinants of international politics to ideational factors, such as beliefs, ideas, and norms. The two dominant theoretical schools in IR, neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism (NLI), share several key assumptions regarding the anarchic nature of the international system, states are self-interested, rational actors, driven by material interests in power/survival (neorealists) or security (NLI). In addition, neorealism and NLI both rely on a rational choice framework borrowed from microeconomics that assumes cost-benefit analysis and utility maximization as the impetus behind state’s political calculus. Although conditioned by the same assumptions, neorealists and NLI reach vastly different conclusions regarding the potential for conflict and cooperation in international politics.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Neoliberalism was an act established around the 1980’s that gave the big name companies total freedom from the government. Liberalism is the belief of freedom and equality. Neo just means new. Around the eighties people who owned the largest companies who wanted to get more profit from their business, by paying less taxes and making the government to less intervene with them pushed for that law. They claimed that the just want to get freedom from the government and after congressional debate they won.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history we have seen many cases of rivalry and disputes amongst states. It is very common that within these conflicts and disagreements, states find something that will be of benefit for each other. This situation brings not only peace amongst them, but also cooperation. It does not matter the level of power that a state may have, at some point in time within their power, they have had to make some type of decision that is beneficial for both. Interstate cooperation is no different, for decisions benefitting internally are just as important.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1914, Europe erupted into a conflict now referred to as World War I, which led to the deaths of over 38 million soldiers and civilians and becoming the ninth most deadliest conflict thus far in human history. With such death and destruction seen through this 4 year international conflict, a variety of international relation theories have arose trying to determine the causation of the war; of the theories that have arose, Neorealism and Neoliberalism seem the best at explaining the conflict. Of these two theories, I believe that Neorealism best explains the war aspirations of both the Allied and Central Powers. Beginning on the theory of Neoliberalism; it begins with a theory in which states are self interested players willing to cooperate…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neoliberalism is a political ideology and an economic model that goes back to more capitalist roots where it values the reliance of free market competition without government interference and has a more individualistic view overall. Neoliberalism contrasts many points of social democracy where the government should be involved with the economic state of the country and must give support to improving the public sector to be affordable and decent for the populace. Furthermore, Social democracy uses the Keynesian economics model to deal with the economy by investing in the people through education and other aspects so they will work or pay to drive the economy. So as the citizens will put in money in the economy it will later be taken out for…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an anarchical world with, the state must protect its own national security over the interests of other nations. States have many options to protect themselves nationally through their own domestic spy agencies, militaries and protective trade practices as well as internationally by singing treaties to be a part of defensive treaties and military alliances such as NATO, information collection like ECHELON and trade organisations like the WTO and APEC . The Realism and Liberalism view both combine together as both believe that the world is anarchical and that while Realism seeks to protect national interest, on occasion it cooperates, such as the liberalism paradigm, with…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Snyder generalizes liberalism and therefore contradicts Doyle’s breakdown of the theory. While Doyle’s list allows room for explanation of the periodic necessity of war, Snyder’s description assumes that liberal states fail to realize that necessity and the reasoning behind war. Snyder also states that liberalism cannot accurately explain why the U.S. has failed to work with some other democracies, especially through international organizations (Snyder 2004, 59). However, while Doyle seems to acknowledge that liberal states distrust non-liberal states, he also seems to suggest that, in the case of liberal imperialism, people still seek to dominate others out of fear. This could provide a partial explanation for the lack of cooperation between the U.S. and other…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neoliberalism Analysis

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As scholars note,“the rising prominence of neoliberalism as a new strategy of governance that reaches well beyond economic reforms” (Hale 10). This exemplifies the power of neoliberalism to not only change economic structures, but also to reinforce a system based off race as well as cause political turmoil. For instance, this idea of free market politics is a way for nations to benefit off those who can't compete with fully industrialized nations. It’s like someone in high school competing with an elementary child in an academic recording; the experience level and access to resources is different, therefore there will inequality in the outcomes. In societal terms, the market is prioritized with the help of subsidies and free trade, while people are left with inflation and substandard wage-labor.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Giving only a cursory glance, one could thumb through Thucydides’ The Peloponnesian War and view it simply as a mere historical curiosity. Written about events occurring almost twenty five hundred years ago, one would assume this lengthy text could not serve any contemporary purpose. Modern mechanized arms have advanced far beyond the hoplite and chariot. Triremes more resemble a third world fishing vessel rather than an aircraft carrier or a destroyer.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although neoliberalism is a great advocator of a free market economy without trade restrictions and limitations in government intervention, neoliberalism also had some very harsh critics. It also brought about harsh consequences (effects) from some of the policies and theories it put forth. Ironically, neoliberalism’s biggest weakness stems from its biggest component: a free market economy, or a laissez-faire economy. Within a free market economy, there is a push for globalization based on individualism (self-interest) rather than a push for community. Carl Menger, founding intellect of the Austrian school of economics and influence of Ludwig von Mises, was one of the biggest advocators of self-interest in the free market during the 19th…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their papers on higher education in America, academics Mark Edmundson and William Deresiewicz write on the alleged crisis gripping the university system of the United States. Utilizing the terms ‘consumerism’ and ‘neoliberalism’ pejoratively, they muse on how each system has adversely affected higher education institutions throughout America. While both terms used are quite similar in nature, Deresiewicz is more pointed and explicit in his characterization of neoliberalism as opposed to Edmundson’s vague, winded description of consumerism. However, after an in-depth reading of Edmundson’s paper, one can deduce that he possesses the same disdain for free markets that Deresiewicz openly flaunts. Before one explores both professors’ writings,…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Khaliun Munkhuu The New Interventionism In the article, David C. Hendrickson argues American international policy has taken completely different and “counterproductive” approach to a notion of external intervention in hopes of promoting democracy by ignoring an old wisdom which opposed such inclination to intervene in countries where there are conflicts both within a state and among states. His acceptance of ongoing conflicts in international relations and his opposing stance against liberalists idea that intervention which is another form of cooperation leads to peace suggests that he is a realist scholar who believes that war is in human nature and, therefore, there is no room for cooperation in international relations.…

    • 2015 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2.1.3 Balancing and bandwagoning: Waltz’s variants Balancing and containment While Waltz argued that power maximization is not desirable, offensive-minded neorealists argued that power maximization by great powers is unavoidable. This view is best represented by Mearsheimer’s (2014) book The tragedy of Great Power Politics.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is where the two very different thoughts, come together, to provide the national security for their own countries. One implied liberal critique is the lack of interest of International Society theorists in the role of domestic politics in international relations. Like realists, International Society theorists draw a firm line between international relations and internal politics of the state (Jackson and Sorenson, 154). They remain dedicated to these institutions because while they are offering certain stability, they are receiving it back from the other nations. Institutions provide economic, diplomatic, and military to…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays