Compare And Contrast The Conflict Between Tiberius And The Senate

Improved Essays
The combination of many crises in Rome lead to the land reforms of Tiberius Gracchus in the 1st century BCE and therefore his conflict with the senate. These lead to political upheaval and the eventually, the demise of the Roman republic. His radical reforms directly or indirectly changed the economic, social and political landscape of Rome. The causes and consequences of this will be explored in this essay, as well as how the the conflict between Tiberius and the Senate affected Rome.

The main factors in making Tiberius´s reforms posible were the social issues in Rome. The three main issues were the interconnected urban, land and recruitment crises. All three of these had been a consequence of the final destruction of Carthage after the third
…show more content…
This was because his father had made peace with the same tribe before and treated them fairly. It was negotiated that the soldiers would be able to leave, but all equipment held by the soldiers would be kept by the Neumantines. The senate saw this as a defeat for Rome and decided to dishonour the treaty. This dishonour was not only to the Neumantines, but also to Tiberius as it was on his honour that he had sworn the treaty. This made him resent the senate for going back on the treaty, which was a predominant reason why it was him that went against the senate with land …show more content…
This included his funds. Tiberius passed a law saying the funds go to his funding land distribution, and actual work on Lex agraria began to be done. When Tiberius´s term was up, he campaigned for re-election, he was killed for this in a misunderstanding as the sente thought he wanted to become king.

Tiberius's year in term had monumental consequences on the future of the republic. He had shown that there was a way to circumnavigate the senate while making laws, showed the urban mob that they could have great influence on the laws of the state and how one could exploit that influence.
He started the divide between the optimates and populares in the senatorial class, a very similar divide to what we have today with conservatives and liberals.
The way that Tiberius had died was through political violence, of which was the first in the Roman republic since its creation. This led to political violence eventually becoming more widespread across Rome. these all created cracks in the Roman republic

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In conclusion, the Roman Republic, though a democracy, had a few restraints put on the power held by the citizens that took away from its democratic…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just like China, the wealthy people were the only ones that were able to vote and become the higher power, but it was not because of the cost - it was because of how wealthy people were viewed. Rome was doing well with their newly created government, but as the months went on, the political system began to decay. There were too many classes within Rome’s “pyramid” and due to a high population, their economy was failing because of inflation. This backlash caused violence to become more common within Rome for these political…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He set a dangerous precedent that proved to be the downfall of the Roman Republic. If Sulla could successfully maintain power by committing violence against his own people, then why couldn’t others? This would later inspire Caesar to march on Rome and create his own dictatorship, Cicero wrote that Pompey once said that if “Sulla could do it, why can’t I”. The Gracchi provided a different precedent of sorts. They provided the example that if one were to begin to consolidate power at the alarming rate that Tiberius and Gaius did, one must be have reliable and powerful support.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gracchi Brothers Rebellion

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the unique features of public service in the Roman Republic was the delicate balance between refining Rome and gratifying the aristocracy that overpopulated every legislative body. Those courageous enough to defy typical conventions and the hierarchy of Roman politics encountered delightfully diverse methods of death. The most notable examples of Roman politicians who died in infamy were Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, tribunes who encouraged populist land reforms and repeatedly flouted the limits of their power. While their reforms were necessary, the Gracchi brothers’ rebellion further engendered an authoritarian relationship between the controlling Senate and Consuls, thereby portraying them as selfish enemies of the state, and weakened…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They became infuriated that the aristocrats had killed their champion. Caesar had pushed the limits of being a consul and leader until it became something different. By the time he got killed, the Roman Republic was changed. This happened through Caesar's politics, his military expertise, and the changes he…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay On Ancient Rome

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This all happened because of the different views of their rulers; Rome´s instability began to grow, in sickness and mindsets, as people began fight for what they saw as the ¨best¨ government. Since Rome was very undecided about their way of government, the population was open about judging leaders and making disputes…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my empathetic response I have written from the perspective of a Roman senator who lived and served during the reign of the emperor Tiberius. The response is intended to have been an extract from the autobiography of my senator, as an impression of Tiberius from contemporary sources, though coloured by the influence of more modern findings. The identity of my senator is important in understanding his stance on the attitudes concerning Tiberius held by the general public, and to this end I have decided to present him under the name of (insert name here ). This choice reflects his obviously patrician status, with his personal name being accompanied by the name of his voting “tribe” and the familial cognomen (Bradley 1990, ).…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “The Fall of Rome — an author discussion,” authors Bryan Ward-Perkins and Peter Heather present and confer their stances related to the fall of Rome. Though the two historians disagreed on a few concepts, they both definitely agreed that the fall of Rome was caused by a violent struggle through several “series of unfortunate events.” Contrary to other historians, like Walter Goffart, Ward-Perkins and Heather agreed that each time the Romans ceded land to foreign adversaries, their internal state of affairs were disrupted. For 70 years, Heather states, the Romans “struggled to survive” amid their “loss of vital, agricultural, tax base,” and their difficulty to maintain their military manpower. For example, Alexander Severus, who was Emperor from 222-235, was murdered by his own troops when he refused to increase their pay.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the government began to take on more responsibility that was originally the citizens of Rome they weakened the people’s spirits, which therefore led to a decline in the entrepreneurs and wanting to gain more wealth in Rome (Document…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death of Julius Caesar changed lives all over Rome. Some had power who had never been in power before. For some Ceaser’s death brought prosperity, and many of the people of Rome had more money and land than they had ever owned. However, many people lost their lives when Ceaser was murdered, and some responded to the lack of control with anger and violence. New alliances were formed as well as new enemies.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are also historians arguing that the Empire actually did not fall, given the fact that it continued existing in the East. Nonetheless, in this essay, I am going to argue that the Roman Empire, at least as a whole, disregarding the survival of the Eastern part for another millennium, had fallen. I believe that the reasons for its fall are not to be assessed individually, but rather as a chain effect from one to another. In this context, I have chosen several internal and external factors that I believe contributed to the final disintegration of the once unified great Roman Empire. Firstly, the fall of Empire is related to the fact that the army was weakened due to many internal and external reasons, making it easier for barbarian tribes to attack and invade.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fall Of Roman Empire Essay

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    This caused the debt of the country to increase. Another problem was feudalism. Rome was in a system that the land was given out to the people below you. Those people would give out a smaller portion to the people below them, and so on. The people of Rome were divided into classes, and whatever class you were in, you stayed in.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This resulted in the Roman Republic no longer standing as a democratic…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fall of the Republic was caused not only by one individual’s actions or one event but a culmination of several actions from different individuals and events. Unfortunately, some influenced massively in the Roman society. There Large and quick expansions from Rome’s foundation as an underdeveloped city; creating enormous holes in the governing and political ability in the Senate. While the powerful individuals of Roman mob like the general were jockeyed for position. The Roman life was facing differences far more rapidly than the governing body could manage.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Livy Vs Plutarch Analysis

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This story portrays Tiberius as a noble and logical man with a love of his wife, capable of choosing his own destiny. The information left out in this tale, is that Tiberius was actually murdered by Roman Senate members. This was left out by Plutarch because it would force the reader to ask questions about why Tiberius was killed by his fellow government officials. Instead, what the reader receives is a clear depiction of a noble politician that had high morals. This then ties into…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays