Compare And Contrast Gettier And Plato First

Improved Essays
In this paper I will be discussing the philosophers Edmund Gettier and Plato First I will discuss Gettier’s views, after would be Plato’s view and finally a conclusion and their views on knowledge and the role of justified true belief. I will be comparing and contrast the views and their ideas of knowledge. At the end of I will formulate and explain an argument that Gettier would have against Plato on Knowledge and trying to figure out what an argument between these outstanding thinkers.

First all let’s begin with Edmund Gettier he wrote a paper about arguing about the the dominance of analysis of knowledge. JTB is justified true belief is the idea of what you are stating, knowledge is something that we gain from learning different

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    1.Opening Discussion: Pgs 61-79 In the opening discussion of Plato at the Googleplex we are introduced to a few of Plato’s philosophical arguments presented in a modern and refreshing way. There are four main characters that persist in this discussion: Rhonda, Cheryl, Plato, and Marcus. Rhonda who is the narrator relays to the reader the encounter her friend Cheryl had with Plato and Marcus at the Googleplex. The opening discussion begins with Cheryl meeting Ronda at a Hotel bar; there she begins to relay her encounter she had with the Philosopher Plato.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Plato

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through the Allegory of the Cave, Euthyphro, the “Socratic Method” and Apology, Plato describes how his philosophical system allow one to live the good life through philosophical examination because the “unexamined life is not worth living”. For Plato, philosophy is a process of constant questioning, and questioning necessarily takes the form of dialogue. Plato believed there is a never ending, unchanging form for everything in the natural world that exists in the world of ideas. The core components of any philosophical system are metaphysics, ontology, epistemology, and ethics. Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that explores fundamental questions, such as the nature of existence and reality.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Socrates guilty as charged?" Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher, is linked with Western systems of logic and philosophy. At an early age, he served in the hoplite-ancient Greek infantry, and later devoted his life to philosophy. His rather unique perspective and wisdom in philosophy attracted friends and enemies at the same time. Socrates metaphorically was the gadfly that stung the horse- Athenian state.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The standard analysis of knowledge is the Tripartite Theory (or, JTB, for short). This theory defines knowledge as ‘justified true belief’: S knows that P if and only if (i) P is true, (ii) S believes that P, and (iii) S is justified in believing that P. Each of these three conditions (truth, belief, and justification) is necessary for knowledge, and altogether they are jointly sufficient for having knowledge. As a counter to JTB, Edmund Gettier posed a serious challenge when he introduced the Gettier problem. The Gettier problems are cases of situations in which a person has a justified true belief that fails to be knowledge.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The final theory, as Burnyeat describes it, is impressive despite lacking clear indication of what exactly it entails (128). This definition of course being that knowledge is true judgment with an account (K3). K3 resembles closely the most popular modern theory of knowledge, which is that knowledge is equal to justified true belief. For the same reasons that this theory is susceptible to refutation, so too is K3. The most interesting claim, as made by J. Angelo Corlett in his work Analyzing Social Knowledge, is that Socrates in this portion of the dialogue already said what Gettier presents in his paper Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmund Gettier Analysis

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In today’s society, knowledge is a key concept in an individual’s life that allows a person to convert raw information into something meaningful like words or concepts. Thus, the meaning behind knowledge can be determined if (1) P is true, (2) you are sure that P is true, and (3) you are given the right to be sure of P. On the contrary, philosopher Edmund Gettier argues that one cannot be certain of his or her knowledge on a specific fact or piece of information even if the known is said to be true and justified. For example, if a male student is the first one to finish an exam in his class a belief may be that he will get a good grade on his exam, and he was right. However, it would be false to say that he knew that if he finished the…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traceel Andrews Paper # 3 Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? – Edmund Gettier Gettier paper argued that for a thought to be considered justified there needs to be a necessary condition and that a third condition needs to be introduced for S to believe namely Q. Gettier talks about three other philosophers ideals and states that their ideas are wrong. Plato’s Theaetetus and Meno In Theaetetus, Plato through Socrates fumble with what knowledge is.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justified True Knowledge

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This concept has been challenged by Edmund Gettier's paper in 1963: '' Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? In this paper, he provides two examples where he claims that a justified true belief does not guarantee that someone knows something. Based on his most popular example "Smith and Jones getting a job'', I do agree with his position…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Plato and Descartes are similar men when it comes to the quest of knowledge. Both men believe knowledge is the product of our own reasoning and understanding of the world around us. They are both distinctive on how to answer the big question, “What is knowledge?” Plato’s way of demonstrating knowledge is his most famous examples of the Allegory of the Cave and The Divided Line, which uses the idea of sense perception. Socrates/Plato set the scenario in which there are prisoners who've been kept since childhood in a cave.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Numerous eminent philosophers and philosophic theories have existed in the history of Philosophy, but not everyone received immense attention nor fame. Socrates is one of the few philosophers, whose philosophy and its influence became widely recognized and credited. Socrates’ contribution to individuals and moreover to the world is beyond exceptional, and in fact, he is the very person who motivated and inspired many individuals to start contemplating on ideas that they did not think much of before. Socrates is indeed a legend, not just in Philosophy, but in general, and as if to prove his greatness, he is often compared with other legendary figures like Jesus, Buddha, and Confucius. Befitting his reputation, Socrates discusses about rather profound subjects, but through his endemic method of conversing, he has reached many significant conclusions.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of the Theaetetus is to examine how the mind accounts for knowledge by seeking an answer to the question Socrates poses to Theaetetus, what is knowledge? (146A). After a few failed attempts at answering, Theaetetus posits that knowledge is true opinion (187B). Socrates responds that in order for one to know what true opinion is, he must also account for false opinion in the mind. Ultimately, while the dialogue produces no operative definition for knowledge, Plato employs this dialogue to sharpen his arguments for what are and are not the brackets of knowledge.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory attempts to analyze the nature of knowledge by listing conditions that must be met in order to know a certain proposition. While the justified-true-belief theory holds true for most circumstances, there are situations where it falls short, leading us to question if knowledge is even possible to obtain. According to the analysis, knowledge is equivalent to justified true belief. A person…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays