Compare And Contrast Alien And Sedition Act

Improved Essays
The Alien and Sedition Act were unconstitutional according to James Maddison and Thomas Jefferson which lead to the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. The constitution was being abused by Federalist, not only did Jefferson believe that he was trying to prove it. People that threaten Federalists in anyway would end up dealing with the Alien and Sedition Acts. Therefore, Jefferson felt the need to intervene. Eventually, the states would succeed if the government did not reconsider these acts and it would begin with Kentucky and Virginia. However big or small there was nothing against stopping states from succeeding in the constitution. The states were not supportive of Jefferson after he claimed his resolutions, No one should have freedom of speech, or determine retribution on rights that are given at birth. Considering that Madison and Jefferson were trying to prove the acts to be unconstitutional, the amendments were being infringe upon.
A violation of the first amendment would be The Alien Friends and Alien Enemies Acts, this gave the president power to
…show more content…
I simply agree with the Resolution of 1798, to get unlimited powers changing the wording of the constitution just needed one more extra step. The French were trying to make people feel threatened, so Federalist were trying to completely take control of the central government. The objective was to make individuals feel that the Acts were unavoidable. People should never have a go through a government system that they have no control of what to say, or how to say it. American is supposed to be a free country and because I don’t agree with the president I shouldn’t be punished. Reasons on why we have voting and elections so that if we don’t agree with one president we can go on to the next on and consider their view points without

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1.As you read the chapter, create a chart of political, social and economic continuities and changes during the war. Based on this chart you create, answer the questions: How revolutionary was the American Revolution? What political, social, and economic changes did it produce and what stayed the same? I will not collect the chart, but it is a good way to organize your thoughts as you look at political, social and economic events during the war and how things stayed the same or changed. For more information on what change and continuity might mean, please read in the introduction section of your book pg.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Constitution was written in 1787, many believed that the new government would still be giving too much power to the people running it instead of to the people. A group lead by Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and James Monroe called the Anit-Federalists went against the Constitution because they believed it gave too many powers to congress and did not specify enough human rights. They also believed that the checks and balances system will fair and the executive brach will turn into a monarchy. In fear that the states would not ratify the Constitution, James Madison composed a bill of nine articles of 20 amendments that limited power to congress to be added to the Constitution on July 8, 1789. Twelve of these were selected by congress…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    rred during the radical period of the French Revolution as a response to the conflict between the Girondins and The Mountains. During this time, the Committee of Public Safety executed thousands of internal “enemies of the revolution” (“Report in the Name,” 47). Although many argue otherwise, The Terror was not a perversion of the original ideals of the revolution because the ideals of the revolution were to gain more equality for the people of France, and the punishments that occurred were necessary and the cultural changes, in fact, benefited the citizens. As seen through the voices of the Third Estate and its supporters, one of the fundamental goals of the French Revolution was to gain equality and freedom for citizens. In the Town of…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some included partial rights of a state and hardly were fully against…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He then came up with the Non-Intercourse Act which was similar to the Embargo Act but, neither one worked and both were hard to enforce. The Embargo Act gave Jefferson exactly what he didn 't want. It resulted in the United States to be 90% rural. Jefferson strictly didn 't want a rural society. The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by John Adams in 1797.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Philadelphia Convention, the federalist constitution was opposed by some representatives of the state because they felt it limited the power of the states. They believed that it gave too much power to the central government. Some arguments that were made for in favor of the federalist constitution was that a central government would better protect the rights of the American people. The Supremacy clause stated “that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government’s claims” (Morone & Kersh 118) was self evident in proving the fact that the central government, although permitting states reserved powers, would have more power than the states. The changes from Dual Federalism to New Federalism…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was a strict constructionist which means that every word in the constitution is to be taken at face value and nothing is to be assumed, or more simply put, if it is not in the constitution than the government cannot do it. He attests this in a letter he sent to a senator in 1820 on the matter of the Missouri compromise. His answer to the question can be summarized by the last sentence of the second paragraph of this letter, "This certainly is the exclusive right of every state, which nothing in the Constitution has taken from them and given to the general government." Although seventeen years prior in the midst of his first term as president of the United States he made the biggest purchase of land in American history the Louisiana purchase. When he knew well that there was nothing in the constitution that gave him the right to buy new territory, explore it, and even go beyond the borders of the land.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    President John Adams has just passed a new act, the alien and sedition act. The Alien act makes it much harder for anyone it become a citizen. To become a legal citizen you have to have lived here for fifteen full years instead of five years like it has been in the past. This act also gives our president the power to kick any illegal alien out of the country, in simple terms making immigration illegal. The Sedition part of the act means this, that we have lost our freedom of speech.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Luke Stafford PS 110 7/21/15 States and Federal Government Rights Does the Federal government have too much control? Is the Federal Government oppressive to the people and States of America? Or are states’ rights well protected in the constitution and political practice? To answers any of these questions, we need to look back and see what the Constitution is and the path that was taken by the founders to where we ended up with the Constitution.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Founding Fathers on rights: Comparing the Federalists’ and Anti-Federalists’ views on rights, and what ended up in the Bill of Rights. In the year 1776, America was at the threshold of nationhood. There was debate and discussion about every aspect of this project because this new nation was a chance to change the things that the Founders disliked about the British rule. One of the divisive issues, was the necessity of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 4450 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1786 the federal government realized that America would not survive with the articles of confederation (“Articles of Confederation”). In the summer of 1787, 55 men gathered to amend the Articles of Confederation (“Constitution”). The Constitution had to have compromise for it to pass(“Constitution”). One of those compromises was the Bill of Rights (“Constitution”). There were two sides the federalist and the anti-federalist (“Constitution”).…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the year 1798 America became a place of chaos after the unconstitutional laws passed under the name of the Alien & Sedition Acts. The Alien portion of the Acts increased the years someone had to live in America to gain citizenship and also gave the government the power to imprison or deport immigrants under the suspicion that they were spies. The Sedition portion restricted all American citizens from saying anything controversial about the government. The Alien & Sedition Acts were unconstitutional because newspaper editors and many others were arrested for practicing their freedom of speech, there was a great deal of debate between the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans because the laws weakened the Democratic-Republican…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the amendments in the Constitution is important to recognize because it represents liberty. Freedom for a state to maintain its independence amongst a nation of other states with different ideas, but all of them look for the same thing, freedom. The 17th Amendment was established to give citizens more power within the government by voting for people, senators, to represent their state. These senators have a responsibility to abide to the standards set forth onto them from the founders of the Constitution. The founders had set these standards, or roles, to ensure the freedom of the people by having them have control of their rights in the nation verse the government.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays