Communism And Pluralism In American Politics

Improved Essays
The scopes of Elist and Pluralist perspectives permit greater comprehension of the Proposition 47 within the discourse of American politics. Elitism is a belief that very few people control politics in the United States. Likewise, elitism appears to be a hierarchical system suggesting that the top dictates all the decision-makings. There are six central assumptions in elitism. The society is segmented into the few who have the power and many who do not. The few, who govern, are not typical of the masses that are governed. The movement of non-elites to elite positions must be slow and continuous to maintain stability and avoid revolution. Elites share a consensus on the fundamental values of the system and preservation of the system. The public …show more content…
Competition among the groups allows for the protection of the personal freedoms. Pluralists pay attention to citizen’s rights; therefore, the competition provides a safety net for the citizens. The process of check and balances and separation of powers prevents groups from becoming too powerful, but individuals can influence public policy by choosing competing groups in elections. Elections permit for the accountability of the elected officials, meaning people can exert influence through participation in organized groups if the elected official is not doing an adequate job of representing people’s interests. Citizen involvement allows for a greater political impact rather than individual voting; therefore, leadership groups open entities to the public. Although political influence in society is unequally distributed, power is greatly dispersed; Some groups may dominate one decision-making process, but no single group dominates decision making in all areas because of intentional design of a fractured system. Public policy does not reflect the majority preferences, but rather is a balance of the interests of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The authors begin by extending an economic model to politics: individuals involved in the political process have diverse utility functions and make decisions to maximize utility. Buchanan and Tullock further this individualistic principle to group decisions and government, arguing that group decisions are no more than the aggregate of individual choices made by each member of the group and that government is simply a “machine which allows such collective action to take place”. (1962,…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many pieces written by philosophers in which they express their interest in different forms of government and politics. C. Wright Mills wrote about the model of the elite theory while Robert Dahl wrote about the pluralist model of American politics. The three best-known theories of American politics are the elite theory, pluralism, and hyperpluralism. Groups have been created to support each of the theories. America’s political process is best defined by the pluralist theory which represents various interest groups that compete and counterbalance one another.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Pluralist theory, interest groups are good for democracy. Even though interest groups are not representative of all interests, the many types of groups still influence others. There is a rise in the number of voters that are becoming independents or non-affiliated with any party. The fewer the number of people that are associated with the Democratic or Republican party give less leeway to influence the voters. Interest groups provide balance to political parties.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists slowly slipped into a fatal decline, and the supporters of Jefferson and Madison then dominated politics for more than two decades. Also according to (Hershey, 2013, p. 139), Madison noted that economic differences are the most common source of factions. In addition, the footprints of socioeconomic status (SES) conflict are scattered throughout American history, just as they are in most other democracies. In conclusion, there is definitely a dilemma in the American political system with the misusage of interest groups.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hyperpluralism Analysis

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Madison, factions are special interests groups that overlook the interests of others to fulfill their own selfish interests. Madison believes that factions are one of the biggest things that weakens our government. Naturally as human beings we all have different ideas based on how we were raised or what we cultured/conditioned to believe. According to Madison, factions are not a good thing, but unfortunately they are inevitable. He says there are two things that can be done, one being to control the source or two control the effect of faction.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The allure of rising to an elite position within a ruling party promotes the continued rise and fall of political regimes, even if the time is power is…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Politics is a part of human nature, an unavoidable part. Even though this is a common characteristic among all human beings, how politics are ran differs among each population. This population could be an entire country or that of a small county in Wisconsin, I attended a Waukesha County Town Hall meeting. I learned a lot from this meeting, but what this meeting specifically taught me about American politics was that there is a severe lack of diversity in those who represent us and also those who participate in public forums. Along with the lack of diversity, there was an alarmingly large sense of ignorance in the council members participating in the debate.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, we have Hyperpluralism the political theory of hyperpluralism holds that special-interest groups have become too innumerable and persuasive in politics, either causing or playing part of government failure. In hyperpluralism government would not be as effective, unable to pass laws do to the evenly divided votes. Hyperpluralism is an extension of the pluralism theory, which is the view that while power is centralized in the government, special-interest groups can have a say or influence the power. An argument that is mentioned when speaking of hyperpluralism, is that when the government attempts to care to the needs of too many different groups they naturally end up favoring one group over another which distorts democracy. When speaking…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pluralism: Indulgence

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chapter 13 Assignment #1 13.1 (Ryan Cho) Christian Humanist, Pluralism, indulgence. 1. Christian Humanist. Christian Humanists were people whose beliefs were based on an old Renaissance movement that combined a revived interest in humanity’s nature and the Christian faith. Christian humanists impacted art in a large and important way, while also changing the focus of religious scholarship.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison to formal groups, informal groups, lacked organization, and thus, lacked consistent participation and representation. What's more, author E.E Schattschneider, claimed that “probably about 90 percent of the people cannot get into the pressure system [organized special interests].” Therefore, for Schattschneider, the flaw in the pluralist “heaven” (America) was that the “heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent; the poor, are marginalized from the interest system, having no representation of interests, because, the system harbors an upper-class…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is true to say that majority rules, but not to the exclusion of the minorities’ rights. In enacting laws, a democratic government strikes the balance between majority and minority interests. If a legitimate decision is made by a majority of the people, but that decision negatively affects the fundamental rights of a minority of the people, then the decision must be adjusted to reflect what is fair and equitable to all citizens. By this said, each individual within a democracy is represented fairly. For example in reading, “Illiberal Democracy,” Fareed Zakaria states, “It has greater respect for individual rights and press freedoms, and even its economy is in theory more open to competition and foreign investment,” (121).…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The elite theory states that the power should be held by a small group of wealthy individuals. In this theory the Elites, the leaders of big organizations inevitably dominate all large-scale societies, including the United States ( Domhoff ). These wealthy individuals will also think alike and hold most of the power in what happens in a nation. Most people in opposition to this think “ It is the interaction of class and organizational imperatives at the top of all American organizations, including government institutions, that leads to class domination in the United States.” (Domhoff).…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public goods are benefits that the government provides for everyone. Examples of public goods include National Security, Rule of Law, street lamps, and roads. Collective action refers to action taken by people with shared interests assembled into groups, called factions, to achieve a common objective, e.g. to encourage a new ideal for their community. It is often difficult to organize collective action to achieve public goods because people are self­interested.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notably, the book (The Logic Of American Politics) is full of interesting facts; some are more similar than you think. In fact, chapter one discusses The Logic of American Politics, which lead to the development of The Constitution in chapter two. In relation to that, chapter three explains Federalism, which created the need for Civil Rights. In turn, Chapter five concludes the relationship between the chapters with Civil Liberties. While reading, I have acknowledged that chapters one through five are different in several ways, however, they can be tied together in relation to one another due to shared facts.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays