Common Themes In The Patriot And The Alamo

Improved Essays
When one watches The Patriot and The Alamo, one can note a common theme in the sense that these people joined revolutions because they felt a personal connection in defending their beliefs and homeland. Not only were they working to protect their families, but they also became empowered by the sense of community as they banded together to fight for the same causes. In both films, these people were dissatisfied with the current status of their government, and they assembled militias in an attempt to secede from their rulers and establish a new system in which suits their expectations of a government. These particular patriots are extremely passionate about their country, so much that they were willing to make major sacrifices such as abandoning

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Answers

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. In revolutionary America, five groups of people, which was the New England merchant, the southern planters, the royalists, labors, and small farmer were important because they led independent from Great Britain because of conflict with taxation, trade, and commerce. 2. Samuel Adams and some people who disguised as “Mohawk” led Boston Tea Party because colonial merchants feared that the monopoly would hurt their business.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Firstname Lastname Instructor’s Name Course Number 14 September 2015 The Battle of the Alamo The Alamo is the name given to an eighteenth century mission located in modern days San Antonio, Texas. Originally designed as a roman-catholic mission, the Alamo also served as a fortified structure whose original purpose was to withstand attacks by native American tribes.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriots or Treasonists? The colonists were patriots because they wanted to gain independence and do what was best for the people in the colonies. While they were under control by the British they weren’t offered or given many rights. Many people from the colonies thought that they could create a better government and life for the people.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the French and Indian War, Britain and the American Colonies had a good relationship, Britain ruled over the Colonies but the colonies did not mind because Britain provided many lucrative trading opportunities for the American Colonies. The American colonies were for the most part only benefitting from Britain, that is until the end of the French and Indian war when Parliament passed many taxes and acts. After Britain began imposing unfair treaties and taxes some of the American Colonists began to not appreciate Britain as much as before. The American Colonies started to grow apart from Britain because the colonists believed in the idea of no taxation without representation. The colonists were outraged with the Sugar Act, Quartering Act, the Stamp Act and the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What did the Texans say? Texas officially declared its secession from the United States of America on February 1, 1861. They then joined the Confederate States on March 2, 1861 after replacing Sam Houston (who would not pledge his allegiance with the Confederacy) with Edward Clark as governor. The secession was decided in the Texas Secession Convention where delegates chose in a vote of 166 to 8 for secession. So why did the delegates overwhelmingly vote for secession and war?…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp goes beyond the mere description of the historical events that took place during the Texas Revolution. Crisp’s passion to uncover why certain events of the Texas Revolution were remembered in a specific way, propelled him to closely examine and critically analyze the motive behind a number of writers and historians. It was this determination that forced Crisp to take no for an answer and to “attempt to separate Texas myth from Texas history”. What makes Crisp’s book Sleuthing The Alamo so unique, in contrast with most historical books, is that Crisp involves himself in his text in such a way that it becomes very personal to him. Additionally, Crisp doesn’t conceal his own personal biases as…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Randolph B. Campbell argues that Sam Houston was a great leader but with a subpar personal life for most of it. The four major moments one should pay attention to when discussing Houston’s time of leadership, are his time governing Tennessee, leading an army during the war for Texas independence, his time running Texas and lastly, his time as a member of the Senate for the state of Texas. Houston made decisions based on what he feels is the best for his people in the long run.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning, movies have always been extremely influential on society. They can be captivating, emotional, or even historical. The Patriot is just one of the many examples of a historical film. Mel Gibson plays Benjamin Martin, a simple man of South Carolina, who joins the American Revolution when the British attempt to take his farm away from him. Benjamin and his son Gabriel rally together in a militia to protect their land from the British.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bibliography Randolph B. Campbell. Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Third Edition. New York: Pearson, 2006. “Sam Houston and the American Southwest” is a book authored by Campbell Randolph and is a biographical account of the life of Sam Houston, and the important role he played in the development of Southwest (Randolph, 2006). The topic and theme of study for the book is the role and the impact of Sam Houston, who was the President of an independent republic, the governor for two different states, and a US senator for thirteen years.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleuthing The Alamo In the Rhetorical analysis, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp dives head long into an extensive evaluation of the events, people, and historical stories of the Alamo. As he began his research he stumbled across a speech written and given by Sam Houston. Houston is a well acknowled man in both Texas and U. S. history with a reputation for fairness, and being and all around good wholesome man with a polished set or morals. Upon reading a statement Houston made to his men Crisp felt as if something were wrong.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sons of Liberty, heros or fanatics “Always stand on principle, even if you stand alone”. My position is Fanatics,because they tarred and feathered people,they went into people's houses and destroyed all of their belongings.they also vandalized homes, the tea party, they were smugglers, stalked piled guns. This is why I chose that they are fanatics instead of heroes. They were fanatics because they did not pay taxes when everyone else were paying taxes. They just decided, okay,…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Colonial America Dbq

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From the colonial period through the early Republic, Americans shared a desire for liberty and equality, two dreams complexly linked together, requiring attentiveness from all citizens to maintain a balance, which proved to be a delicate task, regardless of the time-period. Colonial Period English colonization in the Americas during the colonial period, 1492-1750, made up of two distinct groups, those in search of religious freedom and persecution, and those interested in new land and fortunes. Liberty for early colonials meant freedom from their jobless and landless mother country of England. In fact, many viewed America in the early seventeenth century as a land of opportunity; so much in fact, Europeans were willing to risk the tumultuous…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Rebellion Causes

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Causes that Led to Texas Independence Texas Revolution, a rebellion that took place in late 1835 and continued till early 1836 by the Texans or Tejanos, was against the Mexican government and military. Though, the roots of this rebellion took place long time ago, when Mexico achieved its independence from Spain in 1821 and when Mexico legalized immigration from the United States. Immigrants from the United States gained permission to settle in the state of “Coahuila y Tejas” (now Texas). Moses Austin’s son Stephen F. Austin brought thousands of immigrants to “Coahuila y Tejas”, most of this immigrants came from the southern states of America thus they also brought with them their slaves. Eventually immigrants outnumbered the Mexican-born residents…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1829, American settlers began to reside in Mexico’s territories in the southwest, disregarding their customs and laws. American colonists in Texas protested Mexican rule, sparking the Texas Revolution in 1835. Soon after, Mexican dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna attacked Alamo and won, but the Treaty of Velasco gave Texas independence and created the border between Texas and Mexico (Berkin 314). Unfortunately, Mexicans wanted renegotiation of the treaty, threatening war. On April 22, 1846, Mexico announced that its territory had been invaded and declared war.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Patriot’s & People’s American Revolution Comparative Essay Howard Zinn and Larry Schweikart with Michael Allen interpret American history in their respective books A People’s History of the United States and A Patriot’s History of the United States. Both books, while going in-depth in the progression of America, differ sometimes greatly in their views and opinions of events in history. Zinn differs with Schweikart and Allen in his interpretation of the American Revolution in that Zinn saw the revolution as the logical response to the oppression of Great Britain and Schweikart and Allen viewed the revolution as the glorious triumph over a great evil.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays