Doctrine Of Precedence

Superior Essays
Common law and the Doctrine of Precedence are vital parts of the Australian legal system that enforces that cases of similar nature are treated in a similar way. This principle has been present within Australian courts since the country’s colonisation in 1788, and has continued to aid courts in the decision of verdicts to the current day.
Before the 13th century in England, trials for cases concerning the law were carried out through ways of feudal law, which is the notion that wealthy men known as lords would have power over people in a certain region, although this was abolished by King Henry II, who believed this system undermined his own power and rule. Another form of trialling for cases included various kinds of ordeals, as they were
…show more content…
English common law became Australian common law in the beginning, although it was not seen as important as statute law; common law was more seen as being dormant and being something that would come into use once the country was properly colonised and a proper set of rules and laws was put into place. Once the settlements in Australia had established themselves, a natural order of society took place, which included the nature of crime and the trials that follow to deliver justice. Because of this, those involved in law enforcement as well as the individuals involved in court developed some Australia specific common laws to enforce across the colonies. Despite this new found power over laws and methods of punishment, all Australian legal decisions were governed over by the high courts in England. The Privy Council in England was named the highest court in Australian legal matters, and made all binding decisions for Australia’s lower courts. It was also the highest court for someone to appeal a legal decision to as well, even after Australia’s federation in 1901. It was only in the mid-70’s when Australia decided that the High Court of Australia would be named the highest court to appeal to and to make the binding decisions for lower courts. This change-over was possible due to the ‘Australia Acts’, which ended all power that the British legal system and courts that …show more content…
Their presence in the legal system is extremely important, even though the principles it holds aren’t important at all to statute laws. With their beginnings in medieval Europe through to the present day, they continuously aid lawyers, judges and others legal professionals in creating fair and consistent sentences, and creates a balance amongst society and its laws, which in present time, are some of the most fundamental values the legal system

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Polarising the nation, The Queen v Baden-Clay case demonstrates the extent to which the Australian media can adversely affect the success of legal proceedings. The Australian adversarial system enforces strict rules of procedure, which are imperative to achieve equality and adequate protection in society. Although it is deemed effective, imperfections are evident (Skwirk Online Education, Nd). The Gerald Baden-Clay case highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the criminal justice system through the efficiency of the standard of evidence, rights of the accused, precedent and appeal used within the relentless trial to prove an accused murderer guilty.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromised of its own handling of various matters illustrates how the legal hierarchy is an important measure of the Australian legal…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Select a crime and then find a suitable case that interests you. Newspapers are a great place to start researching for a case - Mohammed Haddara faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in the committal hearing (a hearing in the local court before the charge is heard in the district court or Supreme Court) over drug possession and vehicle thefts . Identify the court the case would be heard in. Outline the jurisdiction of this court – criminal, civil, original and appellate – This court has been heard in the Melbourne Magistrates court as a committal hearing. The Magistrates court of Victoria is the lowest court in the Victorian system and is a court of summary jurisdiction .…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Act 1977 Essay

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The above statement makes commonwealth laws biding on judges, courts and everybody. Section 109 of the Australian Constitution is concern with inconsistency of laws, and it stated…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to support this idea, the history of the Australian legal system should be discussed. Australia is a common law country and the history of the Australian legal system stems from English common law system.2 Common law is judge made laws that are created based around areas that are not included. The judges are required to interpret legislation if there is a dispute about the meaning or how to apply an Act in a case. These interpretations then become part of the common law.3…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been many influences on Canadian law including Hammurabi, Mosaic, and Roman. Britain has had the most influence on Canadian law. Although there have been many influences on Canada 's legal system, Britain has had the most impact for reasons such as Trial by Combat and Ordeal, Common Law, Rule of Law and the British North American Act of 1867. The impact that the Hammurabi laws have had on Canada 's legal system today is that the laws are known, along with the hierarchy of laws.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1987, the Commonwealth and the States passed a legislation called the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross vesting) Act 1987. The legislation was introduced to grant jurisdiction on the Family and Federal Courts and also on the Supreme Courts of other States to determine and hear issues involving State or Territorial law and also provide the transfer of proceedings between courts. In Australia, there is no national civil jurisdiction therefore the cross vesting scheme was developed in order to exercise a civil jurisdiction across all states. Cases such as Breavington v Godleman supported the idea that a plaintiff may sue in a court to enforce charges towards a wrong that is outside the territory of the court. However, the cross vesting scheme…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The True Extent of the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Influence Many Americans currently lack a basic fundamental understanding of the Supreme Court’s origins and workings. The Court is a virtually unacknowledged entity. Unlike the executive or legislative branches, most Americans are only exposed to the Court during a greatly publicized issue—such as affirmative action or doctor assisted suicide. The Supreme Court is entrusted with the Constitution’s preservation through the process of judicial review. This authority means many of the Court’s decisions have a great effect on the American people.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Once you have chosen a case, begin conducting your research. Your research should cover the following details: 1 The individual or group that had their rights infringed—who were they? Olaf Dietrich had his rights infringed. 2 Which right(s) was infringed? How was the right(s) infringed?…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts has the furthest conceptual distance to travel to become community oriented and it may be attributed to the fact that the courts is criminal matters and not problem places. They maintain the traditional values of detachment and impartiality, in which tend to disconnect judges and lawyers from their clients and their communities. The community court has changes how the criminal court work, it address the problems in the community. Over the past few years, courts have been involved with some interesting experimentation with community justice concepts and strategies. Courts have two main responsibilities adjudicate disputes and determine sanctions in cases that have been adjudicated.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is supposed to give back a voice to the people, and stop any corruption in governments. But the question to ask is whether the absolute separation of power actually exists in the Australian legal system. We can begin by looking at the billing process as a good example…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Acts of parliament often provide a general instruction on the law but not how it would work in theory. It is therefore up to judges to examine specific facts for each case, interpret legislation and administer the law in line with their findings. Common law is consistent yet flexible in that it is a constantly evolving whilst maintaining its system of precedent. It allows the courts to create rules of law based on individual and new cases which can be used in future cases to offer guidance. With equity as a characteristic of this system built on precedent, a common set of principle are applied to all people regardless of their status and procedure have been set to provide equality and fairness to all.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It managed, however, to retain some flexibility, and ran parallel to the common law with equal legal standing until the Earl of Oxford’s case, where it was declared by King James that principles of Equity should take precedence. This was codified by the Judicature Act 1873 (UK) which combined the historically separate courts of common law and Equity for a more coherent judicial…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitutional conventions and statutes are central to the New Zealand (NZ) legal system and both play an imperative role. While the two are vital to our legal system, statutes are more important at restraining the Executive in NZ. This essay will discuss the significance of both and argue why I think statutes are more important. A statute can be defined as a written piece of legislation, made by Parliament, which has gone through the processes to become law.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics