Classic Utilitarianism Analysis

Decent Essays
Show More
Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005. page 223). Consequently, human beings with low superiority have a better chance of pleasure fulfillment as they view happiness to be of low content. “Classic utilitarianism is marked by two great features that include the utility and consequential principles” (Hayry, 2013. page

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Restricted Utilitarianism Analysis
    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Restricted Utilitarianism Analysis

    At the end, Smart tries to persuade the audience that restricted utilitarianism fall short to using common sense. Smart’s main ache is the rules that follow with restricted utilitarian. Smart’s vital debate cumulates in the British road system, in which the drivers drive on the opposite side of the. We in America drive on the right side and the British drive on the left side. Smart questions why the rule only has one answer; the answer being just…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Comparing Two Criticisms Of The Utilitarian Approach
    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Comparing Two Criticisms Of The Utilitarian Approach

    I think a utilitarian would agree with both scenario’s and they would more likely say that in order to benefit the happiness of the others (who could die in the bombing), the right thing to do would be to torture the suspect just like in the Waterboarding scene from Zero Dark Thirty in order to save the life of all the people that live in a major American city. Two criticisms of the utilitarian approach would be that torture that man for just being a suspect is wrong and is violating his human rights, and the fact the suspect is just getting punished for something he or she might have not been a part of the bombing, but if so then they are not getting serve proper justice. A utilitarian would respond to the criticisms above by stating that…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism Analysis
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rule Utilitarianism Analysis

    Most of the people would agree that Alex should not vote in favor of continuing to make the payments to the United Peoples Liberation Front. Rule utilitarianism suggests that some classes of actions, like making payments to terrorist organization, are obviously wrong regardless of their consequences as they have negative effect on the general happiness of the society as a whole (Brooks, 137). Therefore, a rule utilitarian would not favor the payments as following the rule, not supporting terrorist organization, should create a greater happiness. An act utilitarian may argue in favor of the payments as they are made to protect employees of the firm, creating a greater balance of good and evil . However, utilitarianism states that the end doesn't…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian And Rights Ethics Analysis
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarian And Rights Ethics Analysis

    In the following paragraph’s, I will examine A-1s trailer predicament using the utilitarian and rights ethics theories as a framework for my analysis, argument and finally decision. To begin my analysis, I will define my decision as two separate course of action, or COAs. I will call them COA 1 and COA 2. COA 1 defined is acceptance of the defect. Under COA 1, A-1 will doing nothing about the trailer defect, accept risks and be prepared to provide the complete monetary value estimated.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Argumentative Analysis
    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism Argumentative Analysis

    In a utilitarian standpoint, parties involved in these practices need to be evaluated based on the maximization of utility (benefit). Chickens are the first party a utilitarian supporter considers in evaluating this case. According to Jeremy Bentham, they deserve moral standing because of their capacity to feel suffering (Lee). In a cost and benefit breakdown, the cost outweighs the benefits. Poultry selectively bred for larger mass exceeds their bones ability to hold their weight (Mench).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Theories Of Utilitarianism And Deontology
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Theories Of Utilitarianism And Deontology

    Although torturing the gentleman instantly comes across as the most ethical option, both the moral theories of Utilitarianism and Deontology assist in compacting our thoughts into seeing if this thought is truly the most ethical option. Utilitarianism centers its ideal on if a person’s actions help the broadest amount of people. What we do to get to the biggest sum of the least amount of bad results is the goal, it does not matter how it happens, as long as it does. The theory does not take into consideration the individuals feelings, only the results of the whole. A good example of this theory is when I was assigned to choose if I would kill one healthy man to save the lives of 5 injured people in the hospital or not.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Theories Of Utilitarianism
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theories Of Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism is a type of ethical moral theory, which, in its basic terms been practised since the classical era. It’s understood now, as it been fully systematized in the modern era. Utilitarianism, in its basic understanding, is assigned to bring greater happiness. This can be found as from the breakdown of the word Utilitarianism: utility is known for, being united, useful and well understood. Utilitarianism expands this word, to spread it to be a united, useful happiness, also called the principle of utility.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    In-Depth Analysis Of Utilitarianism
    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In-Depth Analysis Of Utilitarianism

    Objection: Ideas of proportionality and sanctity of life ideas are abstract just fronts for barbaric and cruel practice of retribution. How do you have proportionality for torture and sexual assault work? You can’t torture the torturer or burn the arsonist. Response: No need to focus on literal interpretation of proportionality focus is on alternative compensation like appropriate imprisonment.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Central Point Of Utilitarianism
    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Central Point Of Utilitarianism

    PHIL 226 Final Part A: Utilitarianism Utilitarianism judges the moral worth of an action in the amount of utility the action will create. Utility is an abstract measure which is hard to pin down. Some branches consider the utility of an act to be the amount of pleasure that act will create whereas others use terms such as “happiness” or “benefit”. Mill allowed for a personal definition of utility to attempt to introduce flexibility that was not present in the previous more Hedonic iterations of the school of thought. However, the particular definition of utility is transient.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Meaning And The Consequences Of Utilitarianism
    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Meaning And The Consequences Of Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism is a moral theory where actions are evaluated by the consequences of that action. The most moral action is the one that brings the most happiness to the most people involved. This is difficult to ascertain, because one must make assumptions about the feelings of others involved. I will enjoy seeing my sister and niece and their families and feel certain that they will be happy to see me. Because my aunt invited me, I will assume that she will enjoy seeing me.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarian Theory
    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarian Theory

    Three different takes on the role of pleasure/pleasantness in Utilitarian Theory Hedonistic (Bentham): "Quantity of pleasure being equal, the experience of playing pushpin was as good as that of reading poetry." (1973: 12) Bentham main focus was on quantity, that he actually had an equation that would figure out someone's level of pleasure. Pushpin is a game and Bentham states that this game has the same level of pleasure as if you were reading poetry.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Kant's Utilitarianism
    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Kant's Utilitarianism

    The higher intellectual pleasure and the lower pleasure related to our senses. It’s not just how much pleasure one receives but the quality. In utilitarianism the intellectual pleasure is more valuable than the sensual pleasure. Happiness is communal and there is no room for discrimination therefore the action that you do that gives the most amount of people happiness is the best action that you can do. Make sacrifices to your happiness in order to make others happy.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist Moral Theory
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist Moral Theory

    Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory, where actions are judged right or wrong solely by virtue of their consequences which was introduced by Jeremy Bentham and later carried out by John Stuart Mill (Kemerling,2011). In regards to the consequences the only importance is the amount of happiness or unhappiness that was produced. In regards to utilitarianism it is believed that everyone counts as one, and no one counts as less or more than another person. And that a person should do what will promote the greatest number of happiness. According to utilitarian’s happiness can be defined in two ways, one by the pleasure and the absence of pain, and secondly by knowing it’s the only desirable end, or the final good.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Egoism: Faqs On Utilitarianism
    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethical Egoism: Faqs On Utilitarianism

    FAQs on Utilitarianism and Ethical Egoism Welcome participants to the ABC Diversity Fair 2017. As we go through the day we will discuss how Utilitarianism and Ethical Egoism is important to recognize and be able to handle in your professional and personal life. As you peruse the flyer you will see the FAQ section that will guide you through this fair. FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) Q: What are ethics?…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Normative Theories Of Ethics: Difference Between Right And Wrong
    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Normative Theories Of Ethics: Difference Between Right And Wrong

    Normative theories of ethics are meant to assist in the discovery of what is right and wrong. These moral theories rely on principles that determine whether an action is right or wrong. Some normative theories include utilitarianism, virtue ethics, W.D. Ross’s intuitonism, the categorical imperative, or deontology. Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy. There is, however, a defining difference between morality and ethics.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings