Circuit Court Case Summary

The claimants argued that the defendant intentionally interfered the contract he had with his employer and was behind his termination. The law gives greater protection for someone with an existing contract and no one time the law will tolerate for a third party to interfere an existing contract and later entice one of the party to breach its contract. Due to that, the defendants intentionally interfered the claimant’s contract without any justification and used improper means to terminate the claimant’s contract. Because of that, the appeal court accepted the claimant’s arguments and reverse the circuit court’s decision by ordering it to perform further investigation regarding the case. On the other hand, the claimant’s second claim which was anti-trust law, must indicate that the defendants conduct had led the claimants to suffer from a damage. Failure for the claimants to provide such evidence means that his claims will be invalid and the court will affirm the circuit court’s decision. The arguments of the claimant was that the defendants make an excluded contract with the current cardiac surgeon, and that prevents him and all other non-contractual workers from performing service in the hospital. Therefore, loss of employment cannot be a valid reason that supports his claim of anti-trust, du to that the court affirm the circuit court’s decision and rejecting the defendant’s claim. …show more content…
Improper purpose involves using false information in order to damage the reputation of a highly respected person. Moreover, the plaintiff must suffer a damage like termination from his employers as a result of the defendant’s intentional interference. On the hand, all opinions are not regarded as facts unless it can be verified through continuous