When chiral pairs of molecules are synthesized in equal proportion in laboratory experiments, why is life partial to only one molecule of the pair? Most scientists believe that Earth life's "choice" of chirality was purely random, and that if carbon-based life forms exist elsewhere in the universe, their chemistry could theoretically have opposite chirality. Most hypotheses can be divided into two broad categories: those of biotic origin and those of abiotic origin. According to the hypothesis of abiotic origin, asymmetry is a result of environmental conditions or sheer accident at the time of evolution. The asymmetry got amplified and propagated over time. The hypothesis of biotic origin assumes that chiral purity is necessary for biological function and the asymmetry is the result of struggle for existence or some other biological selection mechanism. Chiral life chemistry may be a relic of pre biotic conditions or an artifact of the life process. One theory holds that when life appeared in the primordial soup, the first cell formed containing all L- amino acids. This would have been extremely improbable, however, if the soup were composed of an equal mixture of left and right enantiomers. Another possibility is that the first cell randomly formed with a slight excess of L-amino acids, and evolutionary selection favored life based on just one enantiomer. Some have proposed that life arose in many places simultaneously in both L' and D·amino acid-based forms; these forms competed, and life based on D-amino acids became extinct. An alternative view, investigated by the authors(1) is that spontaneous symmetry breaking produced near chiral homogeneity in each of the many places where life appeared. The parity-violating weak force influenced the symmetry-breaking process in favor of L-amino
When chiral pairs of molecules are synthesized in equal proportion in laboratory experiments, why is life partial to only one molecule of the pair? Most scientists believe that Earth life's "choice" of chirality was purely random, and that if carbon-based life forms exist elsewhere in the universe, their chemistry could theoretically have opposite chirality. Most hypotheses can be divided into two broad categories: those of biotic origin and those of abiotic origin. According to the hypothesis of abiotic origin, asymmetry is a result of environmental conditions or sheer accident at the time of evolution. The asymmetry got amplified and propagated over time. The hypothesis of biotic origin assumes that chiral purity is necessary for biological function and the asymmetry is the result of struggle for existence or some other biological selection mechanism. Chiral life chemistry may be a relic of pre biotic conditions or an artifact of the life process. One theory holds that when life appeared in the primordial soup, the first cell formed containing all L- amino acids. This would have been extremely improbable, however, if the soup were composed of an equal mixture of left and right enantiomers. Another possibility is that the first cell randomly formed with a slight excess of L-amino acids, and evolutionary selection favored life based on just one enantiomer. Some have proposed that life arose in many places simultaneously in both L' and D·amino acid-based forms; these forms competed, and life based on D-amino acids became extinct. An alternative view, investigated by the authors(1) is that spontaneous symmetry breaking produced near chiral homogeneity in each of the many places where life appeared. The parity-violating weak force influenced the symmetry-breaking process in favor of L-amino