China And Rome Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
Between 200 BCE and 200 CE, the two leading empires in the world were China and Rome, due to their widespread and rapidly expanding territories. Both empires expanded significantly throughout the span of their empires. To control such vast areas, Rome and China implemented comparable practices, yet significantly different. The Chinese government was much more centralized and bureaucratic, when being compared to Rome. In governing such extensive territories, bureaucratic and legal considerations overthrew individual necessities. Empires required standard measures, uniform decisions, predictable outcomes, and individual compliance. Yet, large numbers of people can flourish under a government that keeps the peace or makes choices that are responsible, …show more content…
Both empires raised taxes to support their growing armies. As these taxes increased, the peasant population became unable to pay them. Since rich landowners in both of the empires were not required to pay taxes, many peasants fled to these landlords for protection. In Rome, this affected trade by making the tax on several products rise, creating inflation within the empire. According to document 1, China had to make changes in order to maintain the growing empire. The Han Empire had to impose taxes in order to maintain itself. Due to this increase in taxes, many peasants fled south where the taxes were lower, or, they could have moved onto the estates of great land owners. China’s professional armies became the private forces of the rich, land owning generals who commanded them. These armies grew in size and power until the generals became independent warlords. Soon, they completely overshadowed and controlled the central Chinese government (Document 1). Since the beginning of the Han Dynasty, the economy had been badly damaged due to policies of the former empire, the Qin Dynasty. Heavy taxes were executed onto the peasant population of the empire and the construction of the Great Wall of China also took its toll on China’s economy. Since the Han Dynasty relied largely on the peasant population for production, the government, at first, removed heavy taxation of small land owners and imposed these heavier taxes on merchants. This, of course, did not last for the entire dynasty because the peasants became overtaxed once again. These peasants would scatter themselves to the surrounding countryside and wait until the tax collectors left. One reason why these peasants fled from tax collectors is that they were trying to survive on smaller and smaller plots of farm land. The population in the dynasty was increasing, and each son was to inherit only half of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Scholars ran the bureaucracy. There was even a civil service exam that had to be taken to make sure that people got jobs based on merit, rather than status. They were also used for making sure that Confucian scholars were in an important position. Any man could take these tests, which shows an equitable system in place. The Han expanded the powers of bureaucracy because that was what was deemed necessary to rule over such a large amount of land.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Qin Shi Huangdi, the first Qin emperor, envisioned a central bureaucratic structure headed by royalty to rule China under his name. Though it came at the severe cost of public sentiment, Qin was an extremely proactive emperor who implemented much of what he had envisioned before. It’s agreed upon that the Qin Dynasty laid the foundation for the massive cultural and economic development of China that took place during the Han Dynasty. Although the Qin Dynasty is easily considered among the most influential time periods in Chinese history, it actually failed to achieve many of its ideological goals. In fact, socioeconomic disparity was not eliminated and despite the ideal of enriching the lives of the common people, it was under Qin rule in which public resentment of the authoritarian government was at its peak as there were countless peasant revolts against the bureaucratic rule of China.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many defensive actions were taken by both countries to sustain a strong government; Rome formed a strong army and China built a great wall to keep invaders at bay. Also, Han China relied…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion constantly developed and changed due to trade between the two civilizations of Rome and China. Religion and its ideology influenced both Rome and China in many similar, yet different ways. Religion influenced the emperors/kings actions and their empires customs. Religious ideology determined the social hierarchy that the civilizations had. However, religion differed when it comes down to what deity or people would be worshipped.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Han Dynasty

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Han Dynasty lasted from 206 BCE - 220 CE, which was one of China’s longest dynasties. This civilization did finally collapse, as most societies do if they do not have all the aspects of PERSIA in line. However, this civilization was a very good and inspiring example of a thriving united empire and self-sustaining government. But that may not have been enough to keep the existence of this civilization.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To achieve a successful civilization, there needs to be a powerful and vigilant leader to lead his people to victory. Document 2 shows a map of the Roman Empire and its expansion…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China was a dynasty that lasted from 206 B.C.E and lasted till 220 C.E. Their empire correlated with another empire whom were about five thousand miles away, in the Imperial Romans who lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Both empires had an attribute that made them similar was that they were both imperial empires, affecting the government’s structure making them both centralized. Han China and Imperial Rome were different in a sense that they chose their kings differently. Of course in Chinese culture the mandate of heaven was usually an important factor however during the Han’s time the second king was selected by the first king’s wives who chose from many sons as she tried to take the empire over through her family. While the Imperial Romans went…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Doc.5)This later on led to peasants leaving from these lands and abandoning their former duties. This weakened the empire's economy by not having a labor force and a decrease in…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and Han Empires were two of the greatest empires in the history of the World and they both started ruling around first century C.E. Even though the Han dynasty was behind the Roman empire by 200 years they both showed equally great military power, they thrived in their economic trade, and had very successful social structures. Although they both had a different decline in their social structure because in Han China peasants began to revolt due to high taxes as well as problems with the mandate of heaven, and in the Roman empire their population were doubting their officials therefore they lacked loyalty from their people, the other factors that led to their fall were more similar. Economically the Roman and Han fell because of their disruption…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland. Rome and Han China politically decentralized because of debauched emperors and officials.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The factor that played out differently in the Roman and Han empires was the social aspect. The reason is affected them differently was because in the Roman empire the peasants and other people in general had lost faith in the empire and therefore contributed less in social events, military, as well as some public affairs. There was also a large gap between the rich and the poor, and since the peasants weren’t patriotic they slacked off with the farming and consequently there were food shortages and even diseases. This was different from China because there, peasants were rebelling due to the fact that there was an increase in taxes. The people of China were also revolting because they started to question their idea of the mandate of heaven.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confucius’s philosophy, and Taoism and its values gained prominence in China during the Han Dynasty. However, the economy was crippled by an uprising and did not recover until the Tang Dynasty. The Tang Dynasty was a further golden age. A series of strong rulers, including a woman, ruled China efficiently and expanded the Tang Empire to the point that it rivalled the later Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. The state’s withdrawal encouraged economic growth and helped China’s economy to develop into the mercantilism of the Song and Ming Dynasties in the next…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sui And Tang Dynasty Essay

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A significant proportion of the Small and medium-scale merchants of Chang’an were farmers who had abandoned agriculture to pursue business activities(pingshuan 258)”. Chang’an had brought in a lot of people which caused a lot people to become merchants. Also peasants had decided to change the ways. “many peasants from around Chang’an left their village to engage in business(pingshuan 258)”. As from early, some peasants had changed to merchants to make money which makes sense during this era when the Sui was in power.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome also had domestic repercussion, but those repercussions were different. In China, they were brief and superficial, while in Rome, the transition from a republic to an empire lasted throughout the empires reign in Europe. Both empires were extremely invested in their public works for the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays