I do not believe that Emily should be allowed back in the house and family until they go through the classes and counseling. I believe that Emily should only be involved for a small amount of the counseling, and it should be mostly focused on her parents. I also believe Emily should not be part of the family due to the fact that an additional 9% of maltreated children are subject to sexual abuse. I would really find it unfortunate of Emily's case got to that point. We are also protected under Troxel vs Granville in 2000 where the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution protects the government to intervene. We can intervene with the parent's rights to make decisions concerning the care of their children. I do not believe that Emily's parents are making the correct decision for her health. It is also proven that being abuse increases the likelihood of a restaurant for a juvenile, as an adult, and even for a violent crime. They can up the likelihood of being arrested as a juvenile by 59%. I would also find it unfortunate if Emily got convicted because we did not intervene. There's also proven that children for abuse our younger when they are rested for the first time. Is could you start young, their crimes can …show more content…
This can really unify this family and Emily. I am not one to tear apart a family. I do believe that this needs to be addressed. I just believe we need to be careful on the way we do it. After the parents are in the classes and partake in counseling, we bring in the homebuilders. With all of this, I can believe that Emily will be safe and the parents can be happy knowing that there are other things I can do to punish a child. I believe that they will realize that other punishment methods will not lead Emily to drugs, sex, and other teenage