Cherokee Removal Case Study

Improved Essays
The Removal Of The Cherokee Nation Just like the Louisiana Purchase white settlers traveled to the western territories. To minimize conflict. Thomas Jefferson wanted to move the Indians to distant western lands but he wanted their homelands in the East. This thought became very popular and in 1830’s so the Congress finally passed an Indian Removal Bill. What the bill was about is moving Indians westward. Although they passed the Indian Removal Bill they were upholding the Treaty of Hopewell. This treaty is the government agreeing to protect the boundaries of the Cherokee Nation’s land in the southern part of the United states. The Indians thought that they had a right to their lands in Georgia so one third of the Nation decided to migrate …show more content…
According to the documents, initially what Indian policy, or set of goals, did the government pursue? The Dawes Act was one of the acts the government pursued. The 1942 Citizens Act was another one . This one granted citizenship to Native Americans. What did the government want from the Cherokee? They wanted the Native Americans land. What did the government try to do for the Cherokee? They tried to give them another land that wasn’t theirs.
2. Over time, the government's Indian policy changed. What became the government's new policy? The Treaty of Echota is about the Cherokee Nation agreeing to move westward. What events and/or people may have triggered these changes? Andrew Jackson
3. Can you propose an alternative policy for conducting relations with the Cherokee that would have resulted in fewer casualties and less conflict? If the United States just left the Native Americans alone and found other lands to settle on. After all the wars and all the new treaties that were signed and fights everyone got into the Cherokee Nation ended up moving to their new land and settling there. They all came to agreement on where the Cherokee Nation went. But I still think that if we just left the Cherokee Nation alone we wouldn’t of had all the fights, treaties, and the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    How did the American government shift from an “expansion with honor” policy to a policy of the expulsion of the Cherokee people? The Cherokee people were once a great nation whose population spanned all across the South Eastern corners of the North American continent. The Cherokee people once called states such as North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Kentucky, and Virginia home. The Cherokee people once governed their own nation, a nation where men hunted and women farmed. A nation where both men and women worked together in harmony as a balance for each other, an equilibrium.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian removal movement of 1830 started because Americans were moving west and acquiring land to settle, but the Indians became the obstacle. Another factor that made the Americans to remove the Cherokees was, because of the gold that Georgians had found in Cherokee’s land. The government would make treaties, but the government would not fully follow the treaties. While the Americans moved west, they introduced diseases, but this was not enough to wipe out the tribes, war was the answer. It was not until Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that it allowed to move Indians further west that became a real problem for the tribes.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Monetary awards were given to guides and supporters of the removal plan. Indians who resisted migration west were put into stockades for long periods of time, until the arrangement for removal began. “They are prisoners, without a crime to justify the fact”.5 Voices of Andrew Jackson, John Ridge, Lewis Cass, the Cherokee women, Evan Jones, Elias Boudinot and many more could not change the course of events happening to the Cherokee nation. The complexity of this time in history raises many concerns for the survival of the Native Americans. The authors posed many questions as to the actions and decisions of the Cherokees.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He had sign into law seventhly removal treaties. Moving the Indians to what is now eastern Oklahoma. Challenging in court the Georgia laws, restricted their freedoms on their own land. In 1831Justice,…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears During the spring semester of 2016, I was given the opportunity to read a very insightful book called, The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears, by Theda Purdue and Micheal D. Green. The book covers the events leading up to, during, and directly after the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was the mass migration of Native Americans from their motherland in the eastern shores of the United States, to the territories of the southwestern United States. Throughout the early 19th Century, there were many conflicts between the government and Native Americans; although none were more racially and economically motivated than that of the state of Georgia and it’s citizens. “We believe the present plan…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokees had a lot of pressure upon them about leaving the land. “The idea of Cherokees being civilized was not going to happen fully because of the new pattern of racist thought” (Green & Perdue, 15). The Cherokees were the most civilized Indian tribe, so they did not understand why they were being justified for removal for the American citizens. Andrew Jackson said “making treaties with the Indians was absurd, so the best way to get the land from the Cherokees was to just take the land” (Green & Perdue,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did you know that the indians had massacred men, women, and children during 1812? The cherokee Indians were given the option to move to the indian territory in Louisiana. So the americans can have the georgia state and that they didn’t like the fact that the indians had killed people. So the americans wanted them to move to an indian territory so they wouldn’t have to kill the americans. They were also given money and a large land but if they didn’t move then they would have to follow the laws of Georgia.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was said that President Andrew Jackson was looking in the best interest of U.S. citizens and moved the indians to help keep from conflicts that could possibly lead to war from arising yet again between the United States and the Native Americans or that some Native tribes were just too violent and were seen as a threat by U.S. citizens. It seemed like Americans and Native Americans could not blend and live together peacefully and that is also a said reason why the Trail of Tears…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Things that lead up to the Indian removal act being passed was the greed of white settlers who kept moving onto Indian lands. They believed the Indians were in their way and pressured the federal government for Indian land. All five tribes showed resistance, but the Cherokee tried doing it the peaceful way. Their leader John Ross took their case to the Supreme Court. Chief John Marshall appealed to the Cherokee in March of 1832 and said “The law of the Georgians can have no force”.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson made a policy in the 1780s to assimilate American Indians into white society. Andrew Jackson, however, passed a policy of removing Cherokees from their lands to the west of the Mississippi in the 1830s. The common goal of the two policies was to acquire Indian lands because the white colonists wanted to expand westward. Battles went on between the Americans and the American Indians, as one tried to take as the other tried to protect the lands. The policies the presidents passed was to take the lands of the Indians, but they had different ways of doing so.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1814 and 1824, president Jackson negotiated treaties that divested southern tribes in exchange of land in the west; whereas the tribes agreed to some of the treaties, they did so strategically with the aim of appeasing the federal government, protect themselves from white harassment…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethnography Report – Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma The tribe I’ll be discussing throughout my ethnography report are the Cherokee Indians. There are three sub-tribes to the Cherokee’s which are the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokees. Although they all originate from the same tribe/settlement, I’m going to be discussing the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. Today, this tribe of Cherokee’s live within 14 counties of Northeastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays