Charlemagne: The Emergence Of Medieval Europe

Improved Essays
Charlemagne was very significant for the emergence of medieval Europe. He was the one who claimed most of the land that is known as Europe today. His fought to keep the Christian faith the main religion of Europe, and Christianity is still practiced in most parts of Europe. In the end Charlemagne had created an empire that reached from the North Sea to the north, to Italy in the south, and from France all the way over to Vienna (Spielvogel 219).
Charlemagne came to power when his father died in the eighth century. He was recognized determined, decisive, and intelligent man. He was a very wise warrior and greatly expanded the territory of the Carolingian Empire during his rule (Spielvogel 215). In his work to expand the Carolingian Empire he was a determine warrior; he took on fifty-four military campaigns (Spielvogel 216).
…show more content…
On the other hand, his eastern campaign was very successful especially against the Saxons. Charlemagne was very insistent for the Saxons to convert to Christianity, and this fueled their resistance. Eventually, Saxony was accepted in the Carolingian domain (Spielvogel 217).
The year following this event Charlemagne invaded the land of the Bavarians in southeast Germany. By the next year he had incorporated them into his empire as well. This expansion leads him to be in contact with the Southern Slavs and the Avars (Spielvogel 217).
Charlemagne continued the efforts of his father’s organization of the Carolingian kingdom. There was no system of taxation in the Carolingian Empire, so Charlemagne had to depend on the royal estates for the resources that were necessary to rule his empire (Spielvogel 217). Even the food and the goods used by the king were derived from the lands that supported him. To keep the good favor of his helpers Charlemagne granted royal lands as lifelong holding to the nobles (Spielvogel

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Charlemange on the other hand did not give up his family or riches to serve God. Benedict was similar to Charlemange’s father Pepin because Pepin gave up his family and riches and retreated to a monastery he built. When Pepin got overwhelmed with visitors like Benedict did he relocated himself. Pepin ended up in the monastery of St. Benedict (The Life of Charles the Great. 268, #2). Charlemagne and Benedict both had influence over people.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Question #2 Melanie A Morway October 6, 2016 The way that our text book describes Charlemagne and the way that the selection from Einhard describes Charlemagne are different in several ways, yet there are some similarities. Our text book describes him as a man that was instrumental in implementing the practices of a Feudal society in Europe. “Perhaps the most important ruler to codify and adopt these practice was Charlemagne, who dreamed not only of unifying Europe under his rule, but also unifying Church and state in a single administrative and political bureaucracy”(Sayre, pg 82). Our text book goes on the discuss Charlemagne’s accomplishments. Einhard’s writing takes a more personal turn, and describes not only his personal and private life, but also describes his looks.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was interesting to see that how Charlemagne has many different personalities as a leader. I found one short story that was very interesting about Charlemagne. In the story it said that “sons of two nobles, whose duty it was to keep watch at the door of the king’s tent” (88,Stammerer). The nobles did not do a very job with the task that they were given with. The nobles drank so much that they were passed out and left Charlemagne tent unguarded.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles The Great Dbq

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne or Charles the Great is most famous ruler of the Middle Ages. He lived ca 742-814 and ruled over the Frankish kingdom which covered Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and a part of western Germany. He went on to conquer much of western Europe, all under a policy of friendship and cooperation with the Christian Church. He therefore greatly contributed to the expansion of the Christian Church’s power. He also introduced the basis of Feudalism and revived the political and cultural life of Europe after the fall of Western Rome.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne loved the Christian religion because “He believed the church and state should be allied as forces in the unification of society” (Christian History). Charles received his education from his mother and the monks of Saint Denis. He could speak and read Latin and his native Germanic tongue, but he never learned to write, though he tried to his entire life (Charlemagne today). In his…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne. " They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medieval Times Dbq

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The influence was major on the peasants. The taxes were then used to build churches to provide education as…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Chrlemagne Vs Charlemagne

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The strongest of the Franks were the first Carolingians, who had a son named Charlemagne. The powerful Charlemagne and his army conquered land to help his kingdom grow, as well as to help the Pope. Since Charlemagne helped the Pope, the church and the Pope both supported Charlemagne’s decisions as Emperor. Charlemagne wanted a more effective government, so he established a city in Aachen. Since Charlemagne’s empire was so large, he hired counts to help him rule his empire, as well as inspectors to keep an eye on his counts.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 16 of The Life of Charlemagne, Einhard goes into extreme detail regarding the friendships that Charlemagne had with the rulers of other Kingdoms. At the end of the chapter, Einhard recounts a story in which “the emperors of Constantinople… were seeking his friendship and alliance. But after he had taken up the name of emperor they suspected that he might want to seize their empire, so he established such a firm treaty with them that no source of any trouble might remain between them” (Einhard 30). This goes to show the honorable way in which Charlemagne ran and expanded his empire. While Charlemagne was most definitely a ruthless leader, he also wanted to show that he was fair to his allies and did not wish to seize their empires.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In those wars he so splendidly added to the Frankish kingdom that he nearly doubled its size” (140). In addition to the successful expansion, King Charles “increased the glory of his kingdom by winning over kings and peoples through friendly means”…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne is often claimed as the greatest ruler in Europe before Napoleon. In her study, Rosamond McKitterick re-examines Charlemagne the ruler and his reputation. She analyses the narrative representations of Charlemagne produced after his death, and thereafter focuses on the evidence from Charlemagne's lifetime concerning the creation of the Carolingian dynasty and the growth of the kingdom, the court and the royal household, communications and identities in the Frankish realm in the context of government, and Charlemagne's religious and cultural strategies. Throughout, McKitterick emphasizes the retrospective nature of these accounts and the implications, often occluding, for elucidating the person in his own time and place.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charlemagne is believed to have been born about the year 742. He has been considered by many people an ideal ruler, and a model for other rulers. Charlemagne, also known as Charles I, was the son of King Pepin the Short. Later when he became King of the Franks, his country already occupied nearly all of modern France, all of Belgium and the Netherlands, most of Switzerland, and large areas of Germany. To expand the country even more he added Saxony, Bavaria, large parts of Austria, the Kingdom of Lombardy, which was all of northern Italy, and an area of Spain.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne as a successful ruler and administrator. He treated his subjects very well and knew when people needed to be punished, when to forgive them, and when to reward them for their actions. He traveled throughout his kingdom in order to exert his power and to help with any issues that may have come about. As a ruler he helped to spread Christianity throughout the kingdom. He made the laws for everyday people clearer and enacted new…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Carolingian Empire and Ottonian Empire each occurred successively. Starting in the second half of the eighth century with the dynasty known today as Carolingian. Then culminating with the Ottonians as they were being established as the Holy Roman Empire. These empires were located in western Germany, France, and northern Italy.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of Louis IX in Chronicles of the Crusades is very different from the portrayal of Charlemagne in The Song of Roland. Louis is a lot closer to the absolute monarch than Charlemagne was. Charlemagne was powerful, but only as powerful as the people who swore allegiance to him. Louis has his own power base. He has his lands which are controlled and loyal only to him.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays