Plato's Autonomy

Superior Essays
1. Justice in the individual as defined by Plato as being a completely internal aspect of a person. According to Plato, every person’s soul can be divided into three main parts. The first part is the rational part which seeks out the truth of the surrounding environment. Next comes the part of the soul that is responsible for the emotions that we feel; this part of the soul is the spirited part. The want to have honor and other feelings of contentment comes from within this spirited section of the soul. Finally, there is a part of the soul that is responsible for wanting everything else such as sex, drinking and desires. This final part of the soul is classified by Plato as the appetite section and is the largest part of the soul. The only …show more content…
119 443d). With appetite being the final and largest part of the soul it is consequently the hardest section to completely control. If one were to allow this section to rule over the others, it could be catastrophic. A person would act out in all the wrong ways and focus prematurely on desires. This is why it becomes so important for the rational part of the soul to be able to suppress and control all of the irrational desires that one has. However, one cannot be completely run by rationality, the balance for the rational part can be found in the spirit of the soul. The spirited part of the soul allows emotion to be brought into the equation therefore bring compassion and the want to be an honorable being into the light. With honor and compassion on one’s mind it becomes a necessity to control irrational desires but with the feelings of oneself and others clearly regulated. To come full circle, one must not always act on the behalf of how others feel but must allow the appetite part of the soul to allow personal desires to be fulfilled in some way. When all three parts of the soul are in perfect balance, one will find justice radiating from the inside of the …show more content…
Much like the soul of a person there is a separation of characteristics of the city when looking at the people as a whole and there is a separation of the people of the city into groups as well. Within the walls of a perfect city, Plato classifies people into one of three classes; the guardians, auxiliaries and workers. The three characteristic of a city that can be critically analyzed to distinguish where justice in a city can be found are wisdom, courage, and moderation. When looking at the proper judgment that is done in the city one is looking at the section of the city that Plato labels as wisdom. Wisdom in a city is attained through the knowledge of maintaining good relationships with other. Wisdom is not knowledge of the little things but rather knowledge of the city as a whole. True wisdom is not held by many but rather the smallest class of people found in the city: the guardians. The guardians are the people in the city that have gone through the most training and education in music/poetry and physical training. By being the best fit and smartest people in the city they are trusted to do what is best for all. Courage in the city can be found through looking at the preservation of the city as a whole. The preservation includes when people stand up to do different tasks and make educated decisions that will benefit the group as a whole. This includes sticking to the beliefs that are hold even in the face of temptation and when they are tested. According to Plato,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also in “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant”, by Christine Korsgaard, Plato's constitutional model says that the procedures that unify a city are based on the actions that unify a person's soul. This makes a city appear to be an agent, "it is not just a place to live, but rather a kind of agent which performs actions and so has a life and a history. And we can see the same three parts in a political decision" (Korsgaard 105). Plato believes that reason is used so people can be well-functioning agents. He says that when people have decisions to make, reason has to come in and choose which desire or appetite is best to act on.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    None of the three components are good or bad on their own, but in Plato’s writing, the right direction of a human individual and the human society is kept when the mind is in charge.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By this, Plato meant that reason did not overcome spirit, spirit did not over come appetite and so on. The soul was essentially balanced. Plato believed that a soul that is in disorder is miserable and that person will never achieve happiness. He compared the soul to that of a city. An ideal city is that where all parts of the city are working together.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even Genius People can be Wrong (An Argument against three points in Plato’s The Republic) “What should young people do with their lives today? Many things, obviously. But the most daring thing is to create stable communities in which the terrible disease of loneliness can be cured.” (Vonnegut) Plato explains the perfect city and their perfect kind. He follows the idea of Vonnegut’s stable community and uses many different ideas to explain how to create this perfect city.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Judeo

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His works resonate with critiques of democracy and the pursuit of justice. His thoughts and teachings are deeply embedded with a singular question of what does it mean to be good? Often using his mentor and teacher, Socrates as the main character and focal point of his dialogues, Plato’s writings burn with the desire of a man trying to reconcile ‘right and…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato, speaking through Socrates, views the perfect society as consisting of three classes that are not viewed more important than the other. However, he believes that philosopher-kings should rule the perfect city. Plato expresses that these rulers should have a passion and love for learning. In Book VII of the Republic, Plato introduces the most renowned metaphor in Western thought, the allegory of the cave. The allegory of the cave illustrates Plato’s views on the nature of knowledge, truth, and the effects of education on the human soul.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main arguments Plato makes is that the soul has the function of “caring for things, ruling and deliberating (Republic, 353d).” He goes on to add that living is also an essential part of the soul. We can conclude from this that a good soul cares, rules, deliberates, and lives well, while a bad soul does none of these…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The allegory of the sun is an important metaphor in the Republic of Plato because it helps the reader comprehend how philosophers understand the Form of the Good, which therefore allows for an understanding of justice. Plato uses the metaphor of the sun to compare the role of the philosophers with a concrete image. By comparing the philosopher king to the sun he is demonstrating how much power and knowledge the philosophers obtain through their intense and lengthy education. The sun is the source of all power and light and gives existence to life.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While today’s students may not be living in the city that Plato is depicted in the Republic, they can definitely learn from it. The importance of justice in the city is something that readers of the Republic can learn from. The idea that justice is important not only in the city but in the individual themselves is importance for readers to know. Another thing that can be learned from the Republic is the importance of happiness in the city and how it is almost more important for a whole society to be happy rather than just one individual. In modern day society, often times those in politics are more worried about their own satisfaction or happiness rather than the happiness of the people they are…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Albeit perhaps not a definition thereof, Plato states that evil is something that prevents one from seeing the truth, which he blames almost exclusively on the body (Phaedo, 66b). This leads to the second great tenet of the philosopher’s worldview, regarding the separation of body and soul. To Plato, the body is more or less a dirty vessel that the soul and abstract forms manifest themselves in, such as beauty (Symposium, 211d-211e). In fact, he despises the body so much as liken it to “bonds” that keep his soul from reaching its desired goal of attaining knowledge (Phaedo, 67c-67d).…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals should be permitted to make choices of their own because it is more beneficial to the state. According to the Republic , a true civilization occurs when degrees of specialization exists in the state. Plato says the principle of specialization defines a city. He argues that the whole structure of a city is defined by the principle of specialization.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays