From “blush[ing] slightly,” and answering, “awkwardly” (40), to blurting, “stiff fibres of awkward speech” (52), the text’s characterization of Edwardian upper-class young males as a clumsy class, unfit to assume their impending responsibilities, critiques male complacency and lambasts the patriarchy’s demands that men rigidly conform the destructive social values that cause global conflict; still, as someone who functions both as the representative Edwardian male and an individual personality, the leitmotif also acquires personal significance when applied to Jacob. After Jacob merely responds, “Yes” (80), to Mrs. Durrant’s recollection of her former travels, his friend’s mother observes how he, “finger[s] his socks,” and labels him as, “extraordinarily awkward,” yet, “so distinguished-looking” (81). As its fifth occurrence, the leitmotif’s familiarity juxtaposes the detached sentiment’s obscurity, and the clash’s confusion testifies to Mrs. Durrant’s own incertitude. For her, Jacob offers a suitor, albeit a questionable one, for her daughter. More importantly, the interaction elicits his awkwardness, while their age and ideological differences emphasize his clumsiness’s immaturity and tactlessness. Later, Fanny Elmer, one of Jacob’s numerous love interests, notes how Jacob removes his pipe, “very awkwardly,” in accordance to how, “Very awkward he was,” though still, “majestic” (160). While topically connected to Mrs. Durrant’s comments, the leitmotif departs from its previous effects. For Fanny, Jacob’s awkwardness highlights the pretension of his behavior, such as his insistence to only read classic novels like, “Tom Jones” (169), and his failure to properly execute his societal role; unlike Mrs. Durrant, whose interaction causes her to experience and exert social prowess over Jacob, it isolates the two. Consequently, the
From “blush[ing] slightly,” and answering, “awkwardly” (40), to blurting, “stiff fibres of awkward speech” (52), the text’s characterization of Edwardian upper-class young males as a clumsy class, unfit to assume their impending responsibilities, critiques male complacency and lambasts the patriarchy’s demands that men rigidly conform the destructive social values that cause global conflict; still, as someone who functions both as the representative Edwardian male and an individual personality, the leitmotif also acquires personal significance when applied to Jacob. After Jacob merely responds, “Yes” (80), to Mrs. Durrant’s recollection of her former travels, his friend’s mother observes how he, “finger[s] his socks,” and labels him as, “extraordinarily awkward,” yet, “so distinguished-looking” (81). As its fifth occurrence, the leitmotif’s familiarity juxtaposes the detached sentiment’s obscurity, and the clash’s confusion testifies to Mrs. Durrant’s own incertitude. For her, Jacob offers a suitor, albeit a questionable one, for her daughter. More importantly, the interaction elicits his awkwardness, while their age and ideological differences emphasize his clumsiness’s immaturity and tactlessness. Later, Fanny Elmer, one of Jacob’s numerous love interests, notes how Jacob removes his pipe, “very awkwardly,” in accordance to how, “Very awkward he was,” though still, “majestic” (160). While topically connected to Mrs. Durrant’s comments, the leitmotif departs from its previous effects. For Fanny, Jacob’s awkwardness highlights the pretension of his behavior, such as his insistence to only read classic novels like, “Tom Jones” (169), and his failure to properly execute his societal role; unlike Mrs. Durrant, whose interaction causes her to experience and exert social prowess over Jacob, it isolates the two. Consequently, the