Case Study: Wheeler Electrical Supplies, Inc.

Decent Essays
To: File
From: Cesar Chiong
Date: December 3, 2015
Re: The tax consequences of the proposed liquidation

Facts
Wheeler Electrical Supplies, Inc., is an accrual basis, and a calendar year C Corporation, has been in the business since 1983, in Texas. Wheeler Electrical has four individuals shareholders, Brian and Ashely Clay and their daughters Angela and Kristin, all of them possess the same numbers of share in wheeler’s incorporation qualified as §1244 stock. Angela purchased the 300 outstanding shares of the others for a nominal total price of $1,000 because the company is not doing well and they do not want to be part of it anymore. Angela’s basis in her 100 shares is $5,000.
One of the problems that might be having an impact on the company
…show more content…
Issue and Conclusion #1
How much will be the gain or loss of Wheeler Electrical Supplies Inc. on the distribution of the plant, building, and land?

The gain of Wheeler Electrical Supplies Inc. on the distribution of the plant, building, and land is $195,000.
Analysis 1
If Angela decides to proceed with the liquidation of wheeler, will follow the section 336(a) which state “Gain or loss shall be recognized to a liquidating corporation on the distribution of property in complete liquidation as if such property were sold to the distributee at its fair market value.” In this case Wheeler has land for a basis of $175,000, a basis of $130,000 in building and plant, in the other side, $150,000 of fair value market in the land, and $230,000 in building and plant. The liability in the land, building, and plant is $500,000, and in order to get the gain or loss in the transfer we need to subtract the total liability against the total basis. This gain will be
…show more content…
The tax liability will be $29,920

Analysis 3
SEC. 108 states that in the income from discharge of indebtedness the tax attributes affected are: NOL, Any net operating loss for the taxable year of the discharge, and any net operating loss carryover to such taxable year and capital loss carryovers, Any net capital loss for the taxable year of the discharge, and any capital loss carryover to such taxable year.
After getting the gain from the transfer of the building, land, and equipment, we also calculate the gain on the inventory would give $18,000. The total gain generate from this liquidation is $213,000; this is the addition of the inventory and the building, land, and equipment. Also we know that the corporation has a $50,000 of current loss in the year, and a net operating loss carryforward of $75,000. Then, the $213,000 of the gain will be reduce by the $50,000 of current loss and $75,000 of the net operating loss carryforward which give a total of $88,000 of income. This $88,000 will be multiply by the 34% of the tax corporation which will give a tax liability of $29,920. Issue and Conclusion 4
There is a gain in the negotiation with

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rouses Corp. Case Study

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The trademark has a carrying value of $2 million in Best Beans Ever financial statements related to costs that it incurred in purchasing the trademark. Required: Prepare a memo to the board members of Rouses (mostly family members, non-accountants) answering the following questions. Be sure to justify your answers. • What is the total consideration transferred by Rouses in the acquisition of Best Beans Ever? • On what premise should management record the land and buildings, i.e., the “in-use” or “in-exchange” premise?…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Of the overall statement issued in this statement discuss the responsibility of both Meyers Inc. and Saban Company as variable interest holders. ASC 810-25-38A. The primary beneficiary as discussed in the subsection of ASU 2009-17, ASC 810-25-38A determines which of the stakeholders are the primary beneficiary of the company and their obligations and ASC 810-10-25-20 discusses the variable interest entity. (Weiss, pg. 1). In this case, Florabama is the VIE, with two VIH in Saban Company that holds a 40% stake in the company and that would make Meyers as the primary beneficiary with the larger stake of 60%, as they absorb a larger loss or…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Section 1031 Case Study

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IRS Pronouncements 1. Rev. Rul. 68-363, 1968-2 CB 336 -- IRC Sec. 1031 - Based upon the ruling, it appears as though the main question was whether or not the location of the property transferred affects the applicability of Section 1031, which addresses the nonrecognition of a gain. For the particular taxpayer discussed in this ruling, he had exchanged a ranch in the United States for a Ranch in a foreign country and received $250,000 in cash.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sales Tax Case Study

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    SUMMARY CONCLUSION ON ACCOUNTING QUESTIONS Statement Period How much should eVade Pays Up record sales tax in State X for particular time period? December 31, 2011 • Recognized $25 million • As liability under Sales Tax Payable March 15, 2012 • Carried over of $25 million from statement of 12/31/2011 • Plus the amount of accrued Sales Tax Payable from…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    At the time Bradley offered to borrow $175,000 on a term loan basis from the bank to repay an existing term loan from Commercial Mortgages. The bank agreed to the proposal, but increased the rate on the operating loan from prime plus one-half per cent to prime plus three-quarters per cent. The bank held receivables and inventory as security for the operating line and a mortgage on the property for the term loan. In addition, there were covenants that RLBS had to maintain a working capital amount of $330 thousand and stockholder’s equity of $275…

    • 4596 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Duane Case Summary

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. According to Ernst & Young’s IFRS/GAAP comparison guide, if the plant were recorded under GAAP, the initial costs would remain the same. Under GAAP however, property cannot be revalued to fair value. The comparison guide can be found at this link: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-US-GAAP-vs-IFRS-the-basics-2013/$FILE/EY-US-GAAP-vs-IFRS-the-basics-2013.pdf) Case Study 13.1 Project: A current project on the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) agenda is “Subsequent Accounting for Goodwill for Public Business Entities and Not-for-Profit Entities”.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The case is about a taxpayer, Mr. Duberstein, who was president of Duberstein Iron & Metal Company. As a result, he did business with Mohawk Metal Corporation in which he was an acquaintance with the president of the corporation Mr. Berman for several years. Furthermore, in exchange for information of potential customers, Berman gave Duberstein a Cadillac. Although the taxpayer did not want to accept the automobile, he ultimately gave in upon Berman’s insistence. Thus, Mohawk Metal Corporation deducted the Cadillac as a business expense on its corporate income tax return and the taxpayer did not include the value of the Cadillac in his gross income.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    CGT Event Analysis

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Disposals manifest from changes to ownership of a business or residential property; timing of disposal ultimately affects the outcome on whether a taxpayer incurs any capital gains or losses. Where the capital proceeds are greater than the cost base of the asset, the taxpayer incurs a capital gain. The inverse holds true; capital losses occur whenever capital proceeds are less than the cost base of the asset. Any capital gains or losses incurred prior September 20th 1985 are excluded from assessment. 3…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coax Case Study

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    CoAx is a publically traded company that manufactures and sells coaxial and fiber-optical cable. The company has two transactions where they must determine the appropriate way to recognize revenue. In Transaction 1, CoAx entered an agreement to sell 1,000 feet of 18 American wire gage coaxial cable for $3 a foot to CableCo. The agreement requires CoAx to hold the cable in its warehouse until CableCo can transport the cable to its own warehouse. CoAx concluded that risk of ownership have passed to CableCo, there is a legitimate reason for CoAx to hold the cable in their warehouse for CableCo, and CoAx has no other obligations related to CableCo’s purchase.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    E (I-28) A) Assets = Liability + Equity $ 84,351 = $ 33,148 + $ 51,203 B) $ 7,071 = $5,314 + $ 1,757 - $ 1 = - $ 132 + $ 131 _______ = _______ + _____ $ 7,070 $ 5,182 $ 1,888 Jet Blue`s equity was & 1888 at the end of the year.…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In November 2012, SFS EF AM committed $10 million to the Borrower’s $25 million, senior, secured term loan (the “Term Loan”). The 17-year Term Loan will fully amortize by 2030 with a 3-year PPA tail. The SFS EF AM’s share of the Term Loan balance, at the end of February 2016, was about $9.02 million. SFS EF AM did not participate in the Operating Company’s senior secured operating company loan (the “OpCo Term Loan”). The Term Loan is subordinated to the OpCo Term Loan.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Goodwill Case Study

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because the amount consideration is exceeding the fair value, there will be a goodwill arising in this acquisition. And there are non-controlling interests (NCI) acquired for A$1,417,000, which will add the amount of goodwill recognise where it comes to the amount of A$20,601,000 
(Steadfast 2015 p.70, Notes to Financial Statements – Note 10). Goodwill that arises in the Group is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. In compliance with AASB 137 a contingent consideration is a possible asset or obligation that arises from past events and will be confirmed only for one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity. Furthermore, in this case there is no evidence of contingent consideration in the annual…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    751 property received. The excess amount will be the loss to be recognized by partners. In contrast to current distributions, the basis of property received in liquidation is the adjusted basis of the partner 's interest in the partnership reduced by any cash distributed. According to IRC Sec. 732(c), when partnership distributes two or more properties, the partner 's adjusted basis in the partnership is reduced cash distributions…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. Prepare a partial balance sheet to show how the information related to this contract would be presented at the end of 2006 using the completed contract method. Exercise 5-3 Percentage-of-completion method; loss projected on entire project ( LO4 On April 13, 2006, the Pagano Construction Company entered into a three-year construction contract to build a mall for a price of $12,000,000. During 2006, costs of $3,000,000 were incurred with estimated costs of $6,000,000 yet to be incurred. Billings of $3,800,000 were sent and cash collected was…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    TO: Gregg Cash FROM: Jihee Kim TITLE: Conclusions from Tech Gadgets Liquidation Dear Mr Cash, You have requested advice on the matter of Tech Gadgets Ltd. Your questions, my answers to those questions, and the reasons for our answers are set out below. Question 1 Issue: Which persons and/or entities are a director of Tech Gadgets Ltd for the purposes of the directors’ duties in sections 181-183 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)? Law - s 181: Act in good faith in the best interests of the company and act for a proper purpose, s182: not misuse position, s183: not misuse information Application • Susan, Paul Smith and Ben Jones are directors: s 9 • Victoria was not appointed director, however, under s9, she acts in Paul’s position as…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays