Case Study: Vriend Vs. Alberta

Decent Essays
Vriend vs. Alberta

• Dewin vriend was fired as a labatory co-ordinator at a private cristian school.
• January 1991 the school found out about vriends sexual orientation and fired him.
• Vriend filled a complaint but was denied
• He was not protected under the IRPA
• He thought it violated his right (Section 15 of the charter of rights and freedoms)
• 7(1) IRPA- “no employer or person acting on behalf of an employer shall (b) discriminate against any person with regard to employment or any term or condition of employment, because of the race, religious beliefs, colour, gender, physical disability, mental disability, marital status, age, ancestry or place of origin of that person or of any other person.
• Vriend and many gay and lesbian groups declared that this dicrimination went agains their equality right in section 15 of the charter of rights and freedoms
…show more content…
• The appeal was heard from 3 judges;
• With a 2- 1 vote the descision of the lower court was withdrawn
• Judges McClung and O’Leary concluded it did not violate the charter
• Justice Hunt believed it did violate the rights in the charter
• Supreme Court of Canada

• Vriend was not satisfied and took the appeal to supreme court of Canada
• Was heard on November 4th 1997 and descion was released on april 2,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The nature of the proceeding in the case of Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G is an appeal. The name of the court hearing the proceedings was called the Manitoba Court of Appeal. The judges writing the majority decision are: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L’Heureux-Dube, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin,…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mavis Baker Case Summary

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case that will be examined in this case analysis is Baker v. Canada. It is a case about a mother, Mavis Baker. Ms. Baker overstayed her visa in Canada. After supporting herself illegally for eleven years, she was ordered deported. She asked to be exempt from the law based upon other circumstances.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Calder Case Summary

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The issues brought before the court are whether provincial law extinguish aboriginal title and was is the nature protection of aboriginal title under S. 35(1) of the Canadian Constitution…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Landmark Case of Bedford v. Canada Henceforth, the case of Bedford v. Canada is used to shows the legal right of safety in the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms is violated due to criminalization of acts related to prostitution. The applicants of the case were former prostitutes who wished to establish prostitution as an indoor business. Furthermore, they challenged the provisions which were the criminalized aspects of prostitution.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU is a case that demonstrates both, inequity and inequality. Several factors in reaching the decision have to be assessed in order to identify inequity and inequality. The first factor was stated in British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU (1999) that “First, the employer must show that it adopted the standard for a purpose rationally connected to the performance of the job.” (para. 5). This principle deals with equality as everyone should be judged according to the same standards.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case United States v. Windsor, problems provoked regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The DOMA was a United States federal law that prohibited homosexual marriage while defining a marriage as a relationship between a male and a female. This act was soon ruled unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were happily married in Ontario, Canada (2007) until Thea Spyer died in 2009, leaving behind all their property for Edith. Similarly to what usually happens after a spouse dies, Windsor believed that she would be able to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses; however, since Windsor and Spyer had a homosexual marriage, Windsor was not considered Spyer’s…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Askov Case Study

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal of Ontario, saying that they found the delays were unreasonable and directed a stay of proceedings against the appellants. This resulted in thousands of criminal charges being stayed, and served as a wake up call to the Crown that due to the serious ramifications of a criminal charge on the life of an accused, charges must be dealt with and decided quickly and expediently. (http://www.chartercases.com/r-v-askov-1990-2-s-c-r-1199/)…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Canada was met with both praise and criticism. The editorial board of the Globe and Mail agreed with the decision, reasoning that long term expatriates are not directly governed by Canadian law and therefore should not be entitled to vote. They also drew attention to the fact that other countries, including Australia, New Zealand, and the U.K., have similar residency requirements. Several individuals and organizations, however, vehemently opposed the court’s ruling. The BC Civil Liberties Association, which intervened in the case, decried the verdict stating that it relied on the “vague and symbolic justification” of a “social contract” between residents and lawmakers.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, the political impact this case had was can a provincial act over reach their boundaries and maybe even frustrate parliament and get away with it? The case stated that the decision made by the judges favored s.6 of the provincial act over s.30 of the federal act because it fufilled the purpose more than s. 30. It led to many questions raised in this case, in whereby how far can provinces can enact their regulations in so far it does not frustrate the federal enactment. The doctrine of paramountcy is one of great complexity and requires a great analysis in truly to understand it, especially when bringing it up to court. It requires knowledge about both provincial and federal powers.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emily Murphy, Nellie McClung, Irene Parlby, Louise McKinney, Henrietta Muir Edwards created a petition to send to the Canadian government regarding what the word “persons” was considered in the BNA Act. The five’s petition was turned…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The laws that are at issue in this case are S.1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Sections 3 of the Charter which states that every Canadian citizen has the right to vote. Section 52(1) of the Charter which states that the Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. Also the main law that is at issue is S.51(e) of the Canadian Elections Act. In the hierarchy of law, sections 1,3, and 52(1) of the Charter apply to constitutional law.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    residential schools for aboriginal children). It may have been established in such a way so that aboriginals may preserve their culture and pass it down through generations. S. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states everyone has the right to life, liberty and justice and may not be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. From my understanding, these rights may be taken away to deliver justice; so in accordance to subsection 17(5) of the Act, the rights stated in s. 7 are taken away by subsection 17(5) of the Act such that aboriginals may not lose their culture and heritage. In the case of Yves De Clerico and Madeline Haque v. Ontario (Children and Youth Services) and Justin Benoit, subsection 17(5) of the act does infringe s. 7 of the charter and cannot be justified because a) all steps have been taken by Yves De Clerico and Madeline Haque to preserve Jeffrey’s culture and heritage, and b) Yves and Madeline are better fit to be parental guardians for Jeffrey than Justin Benoit due to his lack of experience and his history of drug abuse, in addition to not being present in Jeffrey’s life, therefore there is no justice owed to him (Justin) with regards of having the right to take care of his…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For these couples, their natural rights were being revoked and “thrown away.” Riot after riot changes sadly weren’t being made and same-sex couples were still being discriminated against. However after further investigation, the supreme was able to see that this negligence was a direct violation of the constitution. After June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. This day is a true testament to the ideas and concepts created by the enlightenment thinkers.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case shows that section 1 of the charter can be used to limit the individual’s rights, which in this case was fair and just relative to the eyes of the democratic society of Canada. The use of section 1 of the charter allowed for the promotion of strengthening…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays