Judicial Misconduct Case Study

Improved Essays
What factors may have contributed to the judges’ misconduct in this case? One factor founded in this case is that the two judges were corrupted. They receive profits to send juvenile offenders to two private correctional facilities PA Child Care LLC and a sister company, Western PA Child Care LLC (Associated Press, 2009). The payout for them doing this misconduct was $2.6 million. Another misconduct founded was that the judges denied many of the juvenile offenders their constitutional rights for a trial and to be defended. Associated Press (2009) discussed that many of the juveniles only received a hearing that lasted a minute or two before they were sent to jail or prison for their minor offenses. Now I understand that the constitution states …show more content…
The judge need to discuss with both party of the case. Another recommendations I would suggest is to investigate and reviews complaints against judges and, when warranted, conducts hearings regarding the alleged misconduct where evidence is presented. If a judge who is found to be engage in misconduct or wrongdoing then sanctions against the judge will be impose. Any judges found conducting misconduct such as; allowing family, social or political relationships to influence judicial decision-making, conflicts of interest, giving or receiving gifts, bribes, loans or favors. The judges will be removed from the bench, being involuntarily retired or being publicly disciplined. Another recommendation I would suggest is that judges from time to time would need to be reviewed to make sure there is no bias in decision making in his cases. They also must be reminded that they are government officials who must follow strict principles and rules in order to justly uphold the constitution, and the laws of the U.S., and when these officials do not, they must be punished to prevent further misconduct from

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge may also feel pressured to support the group who donated money to their election campaign. Another factor that may help correct the system would be to remove judicial party affiliation. Judges who are affiliated with either party are…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaine Cassel, who practices law in Virginia and the District of Washington provided two incidents of prosecutor misconduct in her article Prosecutor Misconduct in Two Recent High-Profile Cases: Why It Happens, and How We Can Better Prevent It. In the first case a defendant was found guilty of kidnapping and murdering his wife and sentenced to life in prison; conversely it was also found that the prosecutor included evidence that was admissible in court. In the second case a defendant was found guilty of “terrorist activities.” An inmate who claimed he heard stories about the defendant’s involvement in “terrorist activities” was used as a witness. However, the persecutor left out sufficient evidence including a letter from the witness, bragging that he was making up this story to try to get out of his own legal troubles (Cassel, 2004).…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question #2: Summarize at least three landmark cases made by the US Supreme Court and discuss their impact on the Juvenile Justice system. The practices of early America resulted in harsher punishments for juveniles than adults who may have committed the same crime. By the nineteenth century, these practices began to change through campaigns advocating rights for children, as they were becoming aware that children might not be as responsible for their crimes as adults, like previously believed. This eventually led to the nation’s first juvenile court that was established in Cook County, Chicago in 1899. Since then, there have been many court decisions that have assisted with the way the juvenile justice system practices today.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Addressing Diversity in Criminal Justice Policies Dolores Jackson Williams Colorado Technical University Most judges are elected; would it be better to have the judges appointed by a committee? Why or why not? Explain.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American criminal justice system enforces our laws and keeps watch over us but who is watching over the system? Oversight over the system may after all, be less than optimal going by various criminal cases tainted by prosecutorial misconduct resulting in wrongful convictions. From law enforcement, the elected officials, the court system, to corrections, prosecutorial misconduct gained notoriety because of the absolute immunity they enjoy. According to Silverglate, (2000), “We now live in a time of sharply decreasing faith in the criminal justice system.” This decreasing faith might not be unconnected to the egregiously bad behavior that dots the criminal justice landscape.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Controversial Merit Selection The current debate on how judges should be selected is not a new one, but one that began with adaption of the United States Constitution in 1787, as more states joined the union in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The main issue of the debate is whether or not judges, who are sworn to apply the law with total objectivity and independence, should be appointed by an executive or elected by the people-(www.fed-soc.orgpublications/detail/the-case-for-judicial-appointments). Judicial appointments point of origin began with the appointment of judges by the King of England, whose sovereign power at that time extended to the colonies in America. After the American Revolution, the founding fathers decreed in the Declaration of Independence that the King “made judges depend on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.”…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Supreme Court has declined to deliberate whether juvenile offenders are eligible to the Fourth Amendment protection (Hanley, 1981). Moreover, states have acknowledged that the Fourth Amendment has limited both the type of juvenile offender that is protected and the scope of the Amendments protection. Additionally, state courts have not conclusively discussed their reasoning for granting juveniles Fourth Amendment protection; this has left the subject open to…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our readings this week, we discussed procedural justice, due process and whether they are related, in my opinion they are. Procedural justice is the perception that decisions are implemented in fairness and transparency. Due process is when the employer advises the employee with a written notice of the reason for the termination and is presented at least 30 days prior to termination. A copy of the notice will also be sent to the Department of Labor office where the employee’s office is located. When the true process of procedural justice is implemented, people feel they have been treated with respect and dignity allowing the individual to accept outcomes they may not like (Burgess & Cast 2013).…

    • 1873 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Serena Pang Professor Karl A. Boedecker BUS 301 April 6, 2017 I. Court(s) visited: San Francisco Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court, which is located in 850 Bryant Street, San Francisco. II. Day(s) and Time(s) Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. III. Judge: I could not hear the name of the Judge.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the juvenile justice court system kids can commit crimes and get away with it. A prime example of this is Carla,…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial corruption in the eyes of its innocent victims, is wrongdoing by someone in power that can be life changing. People can be fined unfair fees or watch someone who stole from them go free. However, for the judges getting the extra cash or making a decision because of personal bias, a case in which corruption occurs can be part of a normal day, and no one would ever know. Corruption is much more oblivious in other countries around the world. For example, in Azerbaijan, a prisoner can be released quickly, by a simple threat or a luxurious offer without doubt or question from anyone around.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics