Case Study: Dethorne Graham V. United States

Improved Essays
Dethorne Graham is diabetic. After feeling the onset of an insulin reaction Graham asked his friend, Berry, to drive him to a convenience store to purchase juice. There was a long line at the store, so Graham rushed out and asked Berry to drive him to a friends house instead. After seeing Graham rush in and out of the store, CMPD Officer Connor became suspicious and pulled Berry’s car over to make an investigative stop. Berry tried to explain that Graham was having an insulin reaction, but Officer Connor told them to wait there until he found out if anything happened at the convenience store.When Officer Connor returned to his car to call for backup, Graham got out of the car where he ran around it twice before briefly passing out on the curb. When backup arrived, Graham was handcuffed and shoved face down on the hood of Berry’s car. The officers refused to give Graham sugar and …show more content…
Judges serving on both courts accepted that the police made a good-faith effort to maintain and restore discipline and rejected Graham’s claim that the police acted maliciously and sadistically and that he was treated in an unlawful manner. Graham continued to appeal his case all the way to the United State Supreme Court.
The Court held that all claims that law enforcement officer has used excessive force - deadly or not - in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other seizure of a free citizen should be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment and its reasonableness standard, rather than under a substantive due process approach. The United States Supreme Court, in a majority opinion delivered by Chief Justice Rehnquist, reversed and remanded the Court of Appeals decision for reconsideration.
Issue:
What constitutional standard governs a free citizen’s claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other seizure of his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this case of Illinois v. Wardlow, Sam Wardlow, a 44-year old black man was wrongly searched after he was apparently seen acting ‘suspicious’ when he ran after he saw four police cars driving up. He was then chased by Timothy Nolan, a veteran police officer, as he believed Wardlow as guilty. The officers believed him to be in a ‘high crime area’. They caught up to Wardlow and frisked him. During the search, they found a handgun.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In particular the question arises if it is a violation of “Stop and Frisk” under the Fourth Amendment based on the suspicions of the officer at the time of the immediate contact with the petitioner. The issue specifically refers to whether the officer in this case had the right to “Stop and Frisk” the subject without probable cause based on the observations of the officer and recovered dangerous weapons from the subjects…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us V. Williams Case Study

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U. S. v Williams 922 F.2d 737 (11th Cir. 1991) Parties United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit v. Joseph Emmanuel Williams Facts Facts Williams was indicted and charge with three counts and conspiracy to transform cocaine into crack. Mr. William hires a minor to help him transport crack cocaine. He was accused with conspiracy to intent to distribute cocaine violating a federal regulation. Charge II he aided others personnel in possessing and intent to distribute crack cocaine.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Upon arrest, the policeman seized Riley’s smartphone and accessed its contents without a warrant. He found suspicious information that led him to believe that Riley was involved with a gang. Later at the police station, a detective specializing in gangs searched through Riley’s phone and found enough evidence to connect…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    bearing on her actual job. Also, in combination with when Anna was not selected for promotions due to the rumors, although she was highly qualified, indicates a direct and severe violation of the Title VII rights. The refusal to hire an employee due to questionable integrity sparked by rumors is grounds for a hostile work environment. Michael refused to address the rumors because he found them amusing, that is also grounds hostile work environment in an indirect manner.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Billings Police officer, Grant Morrison deprived Mr. Ramirez of his constitutional right to be protected by the fourth amendment and the fourteenth amendment and the right to unreasonable search and seizure and the right to be free from excessive police abuse and the right to be free from Grant Morrison's unlawful, reckless, and deliberate indifferent and conscience shocking deadly force. The Billings police department ie: Officer Grant Morrison and boss, Billings Police Chief Rich St. john acted in wrongful conduct which was deliberate in thoughts and actions by knowingly committing Maliciously, reckless disregard for the right and safety of a citizen of Billings, namely Richard Ramirez. What is sad and horrific in nature, are the actions of Billings Police Chief Rich St. John who created and fostered an environment with in the Billings Police Department of practices, customs and policies that encouraged and allowed…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia starts with a man named Troy Gregg. Troy was imprisoned by the state of Georgia after he was found guilty of armed robbery and murdering two people in 1973. Following Gregg’s trial, the jury found Tory Gregg guilty and sentenced him to death. Troy challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that his capital sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th amendment. The Georgia state court ruled that the death penalty was for murder.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    of the young hippie movement, a growing number of young people who rejected authority and embraced the drug culture (History.com, 2010). In response to police using physical force in a civil protest, the courts Fourth Amendment doctrine regulating police violence, including its recent decision in Scott v. Harris, is unprincipled and indeterminate. The common law of justification defenses, by contrast, gives a well-established legal structure for figuring out when a person may justly use force against another. I believe that police use of force can be constitutionally justified only if they are in pursuit of legitimate states interests. In particular, police use of force is justified only if they assist the mechanisms of criminal justice (e.g.,…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jia Hui Lai BLAW 371 October 16, 2017 Instructor Steve Russell Obergefell v. Hodges Case Study Obergefell v. Hodges Analysis Facts and History Obergefell v. Hodges is the merging of six lower-court cases from four different states, which are Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. In these states, marriage is defined as the union of two people which is naturally formed by a man and a woman. In Michigan, the case DeBoer v. Snyder, it involved with a female couple, DeBoer and Rowse, and the adoption of their three children. This is because, in Michigan, the law only allowed a single people or and married couples to adopt children.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stop & Frisk The practice of stop and frisk first began with Terry vs. Ohio. The Fourth Amendment had long required that uniformed officers have probable cause in order to conduct Fourth Amendment invasions in order to administer a reasonable search and seizure. In 1968 the Warren Court, despite its liberal reputation lowered the standards that police officers had to meet. In order to conduct a certain type of search this is now known as “stop’ and ‘frisk.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    American citizens are protected under the U.S. Constitution against unlawful detainment and unlawful searches of their property. Therefore, it is important for officers to uphold the law with the upmost respect and apply the correct legal standards to every situation based on facts and circumstances. Probable cause and reasonable suspicion both are left to the rationalization of the officer and should be conducted with compos mentis and unbiased…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Search and seizure laws have been around since the beginning of the United States of America, and have a very controversial history. Many deem the way the laws are practiced unconstitutional, and oppressive to minorities, while others think they are just and need to be carried out to stop crime. Police officers have found many missing persons and have also brought down many drug dealers all while staying in the lines of legal search and seizure. Many people fear officers can overstep their boundaries and think that search and seizure laws are the underlying cause of mass incarceration, which Michelle Alexander examines in her book The New Jim Crow.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The man was spotted by Deputy Kyle Farley as he was patrolling Ditty Road when he observed a car out turn into a driveway on Ditty road. Farley tried to talk to the driver who identified himself as Ronald Black and he was carrying a passenger called William Post. A strong smell of alcohol was coming from both Post and Black. On closer scrutiny, a bag of pills were found, identified as morphine sulphate which Black claimed to be medication prescription. Post admitted to be under influence and was charged with public intoxication while Black was served with warrants for the eighth DUI, violation of implied consent law and possession of a controlled drug (Amburgey, 2014).…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Criminal Evidence Analysis

    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Eventually a third man came into play and the other two eventually followed the third man up the street. Once the officer saw this he decided to perform a quick search of the men before questioning. During the frisk Terry had a concealed weapon and was arrested. The issue was whether or not the search was constitutional. The Supreme Court ruled the search was reasonable because the officer had probable cause and reasonably believed the defendant could have been armed.…

    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays