We the legal team for Greene 's Jewelry will assess all the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed argument in court. The lawsuit provides us with the opportunity to introduce different directions for the arguments needed to be made in the courts; from the case laws, regulations, and substantive law. By Utilizing these resources, in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson it is believed that a favorable decision will be made on behalf of Greene 's Jewelry in both cases. Taking a sufficient amount of time to analyze the details of the case we have come to the conclusion that the focal point and the strength of our argument in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson is that she intentionally violated her contract.
The manner …show more content…
The above context gave explanation to the courts of why the company made the decisions they did; what was presented in both cases displays both strengths and weaknesses. We the legal team believes that with the details of each case and the laws that provides assistance the final judgment will be favorable for Greene 's …show more content…
Perception can be influenced by making several changes to the current system, which include having a more sensitive approach to the termination process and contractual agreements for new hire. The manner in which Ms. Peele, HR manager handled the termination of Ms Lawson seem insensitive to the situation. It 's important to show compassion and care about matters that affect the general public. It 's the duty of the company to concentrate on the brand values and situating, as this is critical to showing genuine brand esteem. This depended on broad research and listening to its customers. The most critical part of the progression needed to be made by Greene 's Jewelry is customer relations, and having an extremely proactive approach implanted in sound statistical