Campaign Finance Reform Essay

Campaign Finance Reform Essay The main ideas of the essay Campaign Finance Reform by Larry J. Sabato and Glenn R. Simpson is to make it known that regulating campaign contributions from the public by the Federal Election Commission is ineffective and cannot be supported because of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and to present another way to improve campaigning. The significance of these authors was to approach the issue of campaigning reform and give a different view to how to control political parties and interest groups. The authors begin the essay with arguing that Congress attempting to destroy the Federal Election Commission will only make the system more complex and unable to be understood by a layman. However, they question is attempting to regulate the contributions that candidates receive if the best way to go. They respond to their own question by using the Christian …show more content…
Constitution and by making an amazing comparison to the way the stock market is ran. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, when interpreted loosely, protects the public in their decision to invest their money as a form of voicing their opinions and support for the candidates. “It is unrealistic to expect that the populace at large or even many of the elite activists” will be willing to allow the government to subsidize the “election system at the cost of their individual and group political involvements” therefore making evident that contributions cannot be regulated as heavily as Congress hopes to be able to (259). When the authors add the setup of the stock market, it provides the reader with a different approach to modifying campaign finances. The authors introduce the idea of disclosure regimes that has the potential to be in effect at some point in time because it protects the public from campaign corruption and the public’s