Call Of Duty Vs Battlefield

Two Wars In One Person Hand A soldier is going into a warzone to defend his country against another country, and as he is going around the battlefield, he feels a bullet pierces him. The guy that is controlling the soldier in a video game gets frustrated. Two video game franchise have been considered similar, Call of Duty and Battlefield. Both games are beloved by fans, and the fans would be furious when people say that Call of Duty and Battlefield are the same. Both may have similar aspects, but there is not a lot of similarities. The two franchises have their own identities, and both have created new features to be different from other games. Even though both franchise are in the same genre, they have different gaming mechanics. Both video games are a first person shooter and deals mostly with warfare. Both are the biggest franchise in gaming. Both are also used in big tournaments to win major cash. Both have revolutionized multiplayer, but it was done in different ways. Both use the United States as the main protagonist. Both have been in some …show more content…
Instead of an eight vs eight in other FPS, this put thirty two vs thirty two. It made it feel like a World War reenactment because it put players from there axis in the real world or allied country against other players from there axis. Other FPS would focused on land warfare while Battlefield had an air, land, and sea warfare; that is the game iconic feature. It also had a class system which a player would choose a type of soldier like a medic, assault, scout and others. Battlefield becomes more realistic warfare with destructible environments. The campaign also revolves around World War I, but it helped the players choose a class that they like or trying out to more familiar with it when they play the multiplayer. The game is more suitable for players who wants more of a realistic warfare and a cooperative based