Call of Duty VS Battlefield
Most people have played or seen someone play a video game. A lot of people like multiplayer games like Call of Duty and Battlefield. These games are a game that a lot of people have played with over 321,090,000 and more copies sold for both game series and with grossing over 9,681,300,000 and more dollars. Branching across over fifteen and more platforms that everyone knows and loves. But these two fan favorite fps shooters almost the same game or completely different. We are going to see if the company's, era of the game, and multiplayer are the same or different.
When you hear EA a lot of people think of a sports games. Everyone knows the saying when you turn on a sports video game. It has that like deep voice …show more content…
If you put that in a Call of Duty game, that game will be one of the worst games ever. The newest Call of Duty was Infinite Warfare a futuristic game and on YouTube it is the 2nd most disliked video on YouTube next to Baby by Justin Bieber and Pewdiepie the biggest YouTuber saying can we get the most disliked video. That clearly means that they community wants a boot on ground game no super jumping and jetpacks. The people want the old Call of Duties the are like Battlefield where they were on the ground and modern or in the olden days. The old and modern are the best eras for both games because there are cool maps and old western rifles and modern clothing and weapons and gadgets. These eras of the game change the multiplayer a lot change the outfits and guns and what you are able to do with …show more content…
They like that you can get on and play with friends and compete with them. They are both similar and different with the multiplayer in the end. Some differences are that Battlefield can hold up to 64 player so a 32x32 game. If you tried doing that on Call of Duty you would look like you would be at black friday. With Call of Duty the most player you can do is 18, but that's only with 1 game mode and with the others it 12 so a 6x6 and that is the right amount because the maps. The reason Call of Duty can fit only 12 to 18 players is because the maps are small to medium size maps if you had a Battlefield size map on Call of Duty you wouldn't be able to find anyone. The maps on Battlefield are giant because they made it so you can hold up to those 64 players. Battlefield also has vehicles to move around in such as tanks, quads, helicopters, airships, boats, and a horse so you are able to move on these giant maps as where on Call of Duty you wouldn't be able to. Call of Duty is more of a fast pace game cause its much smaller than Battlefield maps to that make the Battlefield maps a lot slower to medium pace. If you like a game that is more team base where you work together as a team you get Battlefield if you want a simple point and shoot that's fun you play Call of Duty. The biggest difference is
Most people have played or seen someone play a video game. A lot of people like multiplayer games like Call of Duty and Battlefield. These games are a game that a lot of people have played with over 321,090,000 and more copies sold for both game series and with grossing over 9,681,300,000 and more dollars. Branching across over fifteen and more platforms that everyone knows and loves. But these two fan favorite fps shooters almost the same game or completely different. We are going to see if the company's, era of the game, and multiplayer are the same or different.
When you hear EA a lot of people think of a sports games. Everyone knows the saying when you turn on a sports video game. It has that like deep voice …show more content…
If you put that in a Call of Duty game, that game will be one of the worst games ever. The newest Call of Duty was Infinite Warfare a futuristic game and on YouTube it is the 2nd most disliked video on YouTube next to Baby by Justin Bieber and Pewdiepie the biggest YouTuber saying can we get the most disliked video. That clearly means that they community wants a boot on ground game no super jumping and jetpacks. The people want the old Call of Duties the are like Battlefield where they were on the ground and modern or in the olden days. The old and modern are the best eras for both games because there are cool maps and old western rifles and modern clothing and weapons and gadgets. These eras of the game change the multiplayer a lot change the outfits and guns and what you are able to do with …show more content…
They like that you can get on and play with friends and compete with them. They are both similar and different with the multiplayer in the end. Some differences are that Battlefield can hold up to 64 player so a 32x32 game. If you tried doing that on Call of Duty you would look like you would be at black friday. With Call of Duty the most player you can do is 18, but that's only with 1 game mode and with the others it 12 so a 6x6 and that is the right amount because the maps. The reason Call of Duty can fit only 12 to 18 players is because the maps are small to medium size maps if you had a Battlefield size map on Call of Duty you wouldn't be able to find anyone. The maps on Battlefield are giant because they made it so you can hold up to those 64 players. Battlefield also has vehicles to move around in such as tanks, quads, helicopters, airships, boats, and a horse so you are able to move on these giant maps as where on Call of Duty you wouldn't be able to. Call of Duty is more of a fast pace game cause its much smaller than Battlefield maps to that make the Battlefield maps a lot slower to medium pace. If you like a game that is more team base where you work together as a team you get Battlefield if you want a simple point and shoot that's fun you play Call of Duty. The biggest difference is