California Civil Code Case Study

Improved Essays
Issue

Under the California Civil Code § 3344, will former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger be able to suppress images from his storied career being used on T-Shirts sold by Newsflash Creative Media on the grounds that the images have violated his right of publicity in the state of California?

Conclusion

Yes. Former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger will be able to suppress the images being used on the T-Shirts sold by Newsflash Creative Media under the California Civil Code § 3344 because Code prohibits the use of a person’s “photograph or likeness … on or in products … for the purposes of advertising or selling … without such person’s consent …” The images have not been sufficiently “transformed” into something unique and original enough to
…show more content…
Mr. Schwarzenegger has been out of the political arena for a while now and is currently jumpstarting his career in film industry yet again; last year alone, he earned 35 million dollars from acting and product promotions. But, on July 14th, 2015, he publicly announced his endorsement of a Gordon Alexander for the upcoming California senatorial election in 2016. The very next day, Newsflash Creative Media began selling three different T-Shirts for fifteen dollars each: the first shows an image of Mr. Universe-Arnold with text overlaying it reading “Newsflash” and “Robot, Statesman, Governor”; the second shows an image of Terminator-Arnold with text overlaying it reading “Newsflash” and Governor Terminator”; while the third shows an image of Conan-Arnold with text overlaying it reading “Newsflash” and “Governor Arnold”. On the back of these T-Shirts is politically charged rhetoric calling people to “Vote for Gore – the ‘Tea Party’ Republican”. Newsflash Creative Media did not ask for Schwarzenegger’s consent to using these images, and besides the varying overlaying text, the images have not been changed in any way from their originals. The proceeds from the T-Shirt sales are going to the political campaign “Elect Harley Gore for Senate”, but there is no evidence that the company itself is part of a political

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case Law 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Answer: Yes, Bo would be entitled to recover his $1,000 payment plus the $150 cost of clearing the land. He has the option to rescind his contract. Also, Sadia had knowledge and consent that Bo was going to had Lot No. 2 cleared of brush. Therefore, he should be able to get the money back for the cost of clearing the land. (g) Assume that on March 1.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the case of Casimaty v FCT 97 ATC 5135, the taxpayer was doing fencing and farming business, which his father inherited an amount of 998 acres land that was known as “Acton View” (Australian Tax Casebook p.162). He then purchased another 40 acres of land, which he built a homestead. As time goes by, he suffered some sort of difficulties as there were drought, severe financial debts, and as well as poor health condition. As he had no alternatives, so he decided to sell-off portions of the land from time to time as to reduce the burden of his debt. There was a series of eight subdivisions and a large portion of property was sold.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the facts found by Mr. Robinson and the hearing outcome, he ordered that Mr. Sterne be restore to his original position and rank, and be compensated for any back pay and benefits that he had lost since his demotion. Additionally, Robinson found that there was irregularities with how the discipline was handed out and there was no due process and progressive discipline before demotion and loss of pay, thus Sterne was discriminated against an was due his return to his past position with back pay. This case again shows, specific issues with retaliation being taken against subordinates without due process and could actual fall into a Title VII Civil Rights Act case, but the District of Columbia has a Civil Process for adjudicating employee…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In case one, State of California vs Turner, Brock Turner, 20-year-old Caucasian male and was a resident in California was charged with rape of three out of five counts in 2015, penal code PC261 (a)(3), PC261 (a)(4), PC220 (a)(1), PC289 (e), PC289 (d) (Official California Legislative Information , 1993). Turner was found guilty in March of three felony charges: assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated/unconscious person PC220 (a)(1), penetration of an intoxicated person PC289 (e), and penetration of an unconscious person penal codes PC289 (d) (Court Motions/Orders Instructions/Minutes Chronolocial Order, 2015). None of the codes that he was charged did not include the intent “rape,” which may have led to the lower sentence then the max. So, Turner was sentenced with 6 months in jail instead of the max. The district attorney felt the punishment does not fit the crime (Fantz, 2016).…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dustin Hoffman v. Los Angeles Magazine An article entitled "Grand Illusions" in the "Fabulous Hollywood Issue!" of Los Angeles Magazine in March 1997 featured several famous film stills altered such that the movie stars appeared to be wearing spring fashions. The scenes included Cary Grant in “North by Northwest,” John Travolta in “Saturday Night Fever,” Elvis Presley in “Jailhouse Rock,” ), and Marilyn Monroe in "The Seven Year Itch.” The final image was a play on the legendary image of Dustin Hoffman posing in front of an American flag from the 1982 film “Tootsie,” but Hoffman was depicted in a Richard Tyler butter-colored silk gown and Ralph Lauren heels instead of the original red long-sleeved sequined evening dress and high heels. One month later, Hoffman filed a $5 million lawsuit against Los Angeles Magazine's owner and publisher, Fairchild Publications (which is owned by Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.), alleging that the photograph misappropriated Hoffman's name and likeness in violation of the California common law right of publicity, the California statutory right of publicity, the California unfair competition statute, and the federal Lanham Act.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Ewing v. California, 583 U.S. 11 (2003) — Facts: George Ewing walked into a pro shop of a Los Angeles County golf course where he concealed and stole three golf clubs priced at $399 a piece. Aside from this incident, Ewing had several prior convictions, four of which were serious, violent, and/or felonious. In this case, Ewing was convicted of felony grand theft and sentenced to 25 years to life under California’s three-strike law. Procedural History: the California Court of Appeal and the Second Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The State Supreme Court denied review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, as well as upheld the decisions of the lower courts.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baker V. Carr Case Study

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Q1 The main inquiry in Baker v. Carr was in the case of redistricting was a legitimate issue the courts could deliver proactively to revise manhandle or a political issue. The state contended that it was a political issue, so the courts had no purview. The case demonstrated a standout amongst the most debilitating in the Supreme Court's history, with the choice held over for re-contention on the grounds that the court couldn't achieve a lion's share choice. Equity Charles Evans Whittaker was so resentful about the case, he at long last recused himself from the choice, and the worry over the choice may have added to his initial retirement from the Court.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, the Department of Children and Families can only do so much to fix the system as there are laws and restrictions for their actions. They, being a governmentally funded organization, must follow the rules and do not have much say on changing them. In Florida, these certain set of restrictions are called The Florida Statutes Chapter 39. These statutes are created and maintained by The Florida Senate annually, after a legislative lesson. According to the Florida Senate's web page, the Florida Statutes are "[a] permanent collection of state laws organized by area... updated annually by laws that create, amend, transfer, or repeal statutory material" (The Florida Senate).…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion Ms. Justice Martinez delivers the opinion of the court. Appellant stands convicted of murdering Mr. Thompkins and possession of an illegal firearm. The Supreme Court of New Jersey found the conviction valid based primarily upon the confession unlawfully obtained from the appellant and the evidence brought to the court which was also unlawfully collected at the victim’s home. On December 24, the Ocean County Sherriff’s department was called to a wellness check of Mr. Thompkins.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Baker v Carr, the majority made up the basis for asserting jurisdiction because the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, did not give it the power to do so. The Constitution never mentioned anything regarding state election procedure, other than that it could not hinder any legal rights of its citizens as mentioned in the Constitution and that the number of representatives per state were to be determined by state population. Therefore, the Constitution never mentioned that federal courts had the jurisdiction to hear constitutional questions to regarding state elections; the majority simply made that up in order to hear the case. There is no branch of federal government that specializes in redistricting. Since representatives' political…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    California v. Greenwood: Case Brief California v. Greenwood established that items set out in a public space and which are available for the public to inspect are not granted the Fourth Amendment right to require a search warrant before searching or seizing that property. Facts Police Officers in Laguna Beach were conducting a drug trafficking investigation. The target of the investigation was Billy Greenwood. During this investigation the Laguna Beach Police Department asked the trash collector of Mr. Greenwood's trash to place it separately from the other trash they normally picked up.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Mad-About-Milk Claim against California is not valid due to the fact that each state has the the right to pass their, that is, laws specific to that state approved by the state citizen. To do business in California, the nonprofit organization must follow the California laws as they are written. As long as the law pertains to everyone, it is not a violation of the constitution. In this case, we are dealing with a state law, not federal law and the difference between the two is that federal law deals with orders from the President, legislation passed by Congress and decisions that are involved in the Federal Courts that basically interprets the Constitution; whereas the state law, each separate state is governed by their own law.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Progressive Era Dbq

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people and progressives being influenced by such an influential cartoon, and seeing these actions take place, pushed for action to be taken against these wealthy lobbyists. This lead to…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Civil laws are laws that are set in place to help protect people rights when it comes down to person to person. One example might be landlord, tenant situation where the tenant is failing to pay rent which was agreed upon, and an agreement was signed. This is where civil law would step in and assist the landlord. As described in our book, Criminal law is dealing with wrong doings against society. These laws are put in place and have consequences.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays