Although numerous people debate over whether bystanders shouldn’t intervene, there are countless people who support the claim that they should. Why? Because it is quicker for someone to intervene rather than to wait for the authorities, stopping a current action while it’s happening can stop future actions, and the power of using your voice can impact not just the conflict, but all in all character growth.
As a fight breaks out, the first concept some people expect to do call the police. People assume the police are the quickest way to stop a conflict. Although Is it truly the quickest way? Now, while calling the police may resolve the conflict in the end, they won’t stop what’s happening in the moment. It is quicker for someone to intervene …show more content…
Also, victims can only think about how they wish someone would intervene in times of distress. All in spite of while the situation gains intensity, victims wait for the bystander to arrange a move, over the importance of a bystander intervening before the police arrive can determine life or death. For instance, according to writer Lou Michel, bystander Brenden Seny used his seat belt to tie a tourniquet (a device that helps to stop bleeding) around a child named Nate’s leg after he was hit by an intoxicated driver. This then stopped the bleeding and saved his life. “The young man could have bled out right there on the street if he hadn’t been assisted right then and there.” (Michel). Michel also states how the ambulance took 15 minutes to arrive, which then would have been too late. This Indicates that if a bystander wouldn’t have intervened, Kahn would have bled out and died. Another reason why having someone intervene than calling the police or the authorities is better is that at times, police don’t do the job they …show more content…
Occasionally, fights can turn out critical and result in serious injury, or death. Given the opportunity, majority of people wouldn’t intervene. Article 6 Reasons why Bystanders Choose Not to Intervene to Stop Bullying tells us that various people are scared that they’ll be next or they don’t know what to do to cause it stop, which doesn’t effect the situation. (Sam). Although this might be true in some cases, not helping can result in death. For instance, on Fox 32, a reporter states that a man was attacked and left to die for his wallet. Bystanders observed this happen and did nothing. This is why bystanders need to intervene while they can or it might be too late. Taking on bigger problems, Syrians ask for help to prevent further conflict and try to adopt new ideas to stop wars so they can stop conflict before hand. Across Syria, people struggle with poverty, starvation, and more important, war. Individuals now have the responsibility to intervene attacks and protect citizens, (Kako). Other countries must assemble to do this though. Creating a protective system made out of individuals can stop further war. (Kako). Coming together as a community to help each other and form a protective army-like system can stop further war crimes and stop attacks all together, preventing death. Also, adults talking with students about bullying can stop a current action and save someone’s
As a fight breaks out, the first concept some people expect to do call the police. People assume the police are the quickest way to stop a conflict. Although Is it truly the quickest way? Now, while calling the police may resolve the conflict in the end, they won’t stop what’s happening in the moment. It is quicker for someone to intervene …show more content…
Also, victims can only think about how they wish someone would intervene in times of distress. All in spite of while the situation gains intensity, victims wait for the bystander to arrange a move, over the importance of a bystander intervening before the police arrive can determine life or death. For instance, according to writer Lou Michel, bystander Brenden Seny used his seat belt to tie a tourniquet (a device that helps to stop bleeding) around a child named Nate’s leg after he was hit by an intoxicated driver. This then stopped the bleeding and saved his life. “The young man could have bled out right there on the street if he hadn’t been assisted right then and there.” (Michel). Michel also states how the ambulance took 15 minutes to arrive, which then would have been too late. This Indicates that if a bystander wouldn’t have intervened, Kahn would have bled out and died. Another reason why having someone intervene than calling the police or the authorities is better is that at times, police don’t do the job they …show more content…
Occasionally, fights can turn out critical and result in serious injury, or death. Given the opportunity, majority of people wouldn’t intervene. Article 6 Reasons why Bystanders Choose Not to Intervene to Stop Bullying tells us that various people are scared that they’ll be next or they don’t know what to do to cause it stop, which doesn’t effect the situation. (Sam). Although this might be true in some cases, not helping can result in death. For instance, on Fox 32, a reporter states that a man was attacked and left to die for his wallet. Bystanders observed this happen and did nothing. This is why bystanders need to intervene while they can or it might be too late. Taking on bigger problems, Syrians ask for help to prevent further conflict and try to adopt new ideas to stop wars so they can stop conflict before hand. Across Syria, people struggle with poverty, starvation, and more important, war. Individuals now have the responsibility to intervene attacks and protect citizens, (Kako). Other countries must assemble to do this though. Creating a protective system made out of individuals can stop further war. (Kako). Coming together as a community to help each other and form a protective army-like system can stop further war crimes and stop attacks all together, preventing death. Also, adults talking with students about bullying can stop a current action and save someone’s