1. Burke believed that the revolution in France had only negative results, such as the destruction of virtues and chaos in the state. Based on the principles of Kant, can Burke be considered as an enlightened or does he have limited views about this situation?
2. Burke argues that the desire to update something on the government board is the goal of an egotistical person, since in his opinion the government and privileges should be maintained and transferred in the same way as they were received. He also believes that people should improve what is never new and preserve what never becomes obsolete. But if there are no innovations, how will the state develop on an equal footing with other countries?
3. According to Hegel, the state is a divine idea in its earthly shell, the goal of world history, where freedom obtains its objectivity; reasonable necessity, the world spirit finds its realization in it. However, if the state is governed by a dictator or a person pursuing his personal goals and benefits, the realization of which can limit the freedom of people, how can the world spirit be realized in the state?
4. Hegel argued that man’s free is only potential phenomena, his freedom exists only in the concept of "natural" human freedom which is only an accident and arbitrariness. Moreover, he states that “in order for a person to realize …show more content…
According to Hegel, “complete freedom was embodied only among the Germanic peoples, who in their historical development, inheriting the fruits of the Reformation and the French Revolution, achieved universal civil and political freedom”. However, according to Burke, the result of the French Revolution was the distortion of the people's freedom. In his view, “France bought poverty at the cost of crime” and the Declaration of Rights, whose adoption became one of the results of the revolution, is far from the truth. Considering all that has been said, is it possible to consider that the German people have completely realized
2. Burke argues that the desire to update something on the government board is the goal of an egotistical person, since in his opinion the government and privileges should be maintained and transferred in the same way as they were received. He also believes that people should improve what is never new and preserve what never becomes obsolete. But if there are no innovations, how will the state develop on an equal footing with other countries?
3. According to Hegel, the state is a divine idea in its earthly shell, the goal of world history, where freedom obtains its objectivity; reasonable necessity, the world spirit finds its realization in it. However, if the state is governed by a dictator or a person pursuing his personal goals and benefits, the realization of which can limit the freedom of people, how can the world spirit be realized in the state?
4. Hegel argued that man’s free is only potential phenomena, his freedom exists only in the concept of "natural" human freedom which is only an accident and arbitrariness. Moreover, he states that “in order for a person to realize …show more content…
According to Hegel, “complete freedom was embodied only among the Germanic peoples, who in their historical development, inheriting the fruits of the Reformation and the French Revolution, achieved universal civil and political freedom”. However, according to Burke, the result of the French Revolution was the distortion of the people's freedom. In his view, “France bought poverty at the cost of crime” and the Declaration of Rights, whose adoption became one of the results of the revolution, is far from the truth. Considering all that has been said, is it possible to consider that the German people have completely realized