I will argue that Bigfoot/ The Abominable Snowman is not real. No one has any actual proof that they have seen him. The hunt for Bigfoot has goes back to the early 326 BC and still continues today. The only evidence people has of Bigfoot is pictures, where most of them are very blurry. Any of the pictures could be photoshopped or the person taking the photo could have mistaken it for a bear. Most of the time “Bigfoot” is seen in the snow, which makes things not very clear. Most people just want attention and to become “famous” for discovering something new. Before 1847 the Gorilla was unnamed and known only through rumor.
Sightings of large ape/man creatures have been reported for thousands of years from every corner of the globe and the similarities …show more content…
It is said that “too many eyewitnesses for this phenomenon to be purely imaginary.” There are a lot of myths about different things where people claim to have saw something. “At this time there are no Bigfoot researchers, yet the pictures are starting to get better.” Said Blaze. My opinion is scientists do not believe in Bigfoot either, if so they would have cameras and people camping out to get footage of “Bigfoot.” Laura Spark said “A UK geneticist may have unlocked the truth.” Bryan Sykes set up an article and asked people if they found a rare piece of hair to bring it to him to have it tested. DNA testing and comparison of the findings of a database of other animals genomes is $2000 for each hair sample. Bryan said “It could be worth it.” This is true but what is a piece of hair going to do? It’s not the same as actually having Bigfoot. Bryan Sykes had two hair samples brought to him from mystery animals, both were proved to be a genetic match to an ancient polar bear also was found in the Himalayas where people said they have spotted him. “There is a subspecies of brown bear in the High Himalayas descended from the bear that was the ancestor of the polar bear.” said Laura Spark. This research came from the National Geographic Channel (#2, Laura …show more content…
Licensed priced to hunt for Bigfoot is $400 per year, no one has succeeded in capturing a specimen dead, or alive. Over the years---often captured in blurred photos or shaky video footage---are based on fact, mistaken, identity or elaborate hoaxes. There's obviously a reason why no one can seem to get a clear picture. The name “Abominable Snowman was coined in 1921 by journalist Henry Newman who mistranslated the Tibetan label Metoh-Kangmi” “dirty men in the snow (#3, Henry Newman). I do not believe Bigfoot is real because of all the misinterpretations with the pictures and videos, they’ve never found in bones, and because no one really cares much anymore. People believe in Bigfoot because of the pictures most people believe anything they see or hear. There are plenty of myths about stuff like this. If Bigfoot was real I'm sure a scientist or someone would have already proved it but it has been going on for so long i do not see a possible way for him to be real. It is said that he is only found in cold
Sightings of large ape/man creatures have been reported for thousands of years from every corner of the globe and the similarities …show more content…
It is said that “too many eyewitnesses for this phenomenon to be purely imaginary.” There are a lot of myths about different things where people claim to have saw something. “At this time there are no Bigfoot researchers, yet the pictures are starting to get better.” Said Blaze. My opinion is scientists do not believe in Bigfoot either, if so they would have cameras and people camping out to get footage of “Bigfoot.” Laura Spark said “A UK geneticist may have unlocked the truth.” Bryan Sykes set up an article and asked people if they found a rare piece of hair to bring it to him to have it tested. DNA testing and comparison of the findings of a database of other animals genomes is $2000 for each hair sample. Bryan said “It could be worth it.” This is true but what is a piece of hair going to do? It’s not the same as actually having Bigfoot. Bryan Sykes had two hair samples brought to him from mystery animals, both were proved to be a genetic match to an ancient polar bear also was found in the Himalayas where people said they have spotted him. “There is a subspecies of brown bear in the High Himalayas descended from the bear that was the ancestor of the polar bear.” said Laura Spark. This research came from the National Geographic Channel (#2, Laura …show more content…
Licensed priced to hunt for Bigfoot is $400 per year, no one has succeeded in capturing a specimen dead, or alive. Over the years---often captured in blurred photos or shaky video footage---are based on fact, mistaken, identity or elaborate hoaxes. There's obviously a reason why no one can seem to get a clear picture. The name “Abominable Snowman was coined in 1921 by journalist Henry Newman who mistranslated the Tibetan label Metoh-Kangmi” “dirty men in the snow (#3, Henry Newman). I do not believe Bigfoot is real because of all the misinterpretations with the pictures and videos, they’ve never found in bones, and because no one really cares much anymore. People believe in Bigfoot because of the pictures most people believe anything they see or hear. There are plenty of myths about stuff like this. If Bigfoot was real I'm sure a scientist or someone would have already proved it but it has been going on for so long i do not see a possible way for him to be real. It is said that he is only found in cold