Walmart does a very poor job of satisfying its stakeholders, with unions, employees, and even the general communities getting negatively affected, also they have shown no hesitation towards breaking of laws when necessary. The benefits for their various practices are obvious; more profit, Having little competition, and succeeding in the global growth of business while satisfying consumers with a promise of low prices. Technically speaking, Walmart is not a sustainable enterprise in various ways, considering how often it takes shortcuts for faster profits at the harm to society and the economy. Though it has maintained its position as global and domestic retailer, its loss is that as the wide protests in china are getting ground from employees, the same could happen in various other countries where they have set up business, leading the governments to build barriers and laws that would inevitably hurt Walmart 's globalization. They have not only lost money while selling items below the cost at times to drive out competition, According to Norman (2008), that can be seen through the case of Sam 's club in Oklahoma, where they lost $250,000 to $300,000 on gas sales at three stores while using below cost tactic; They have threw hundreds of…
