Atheistic Argument From Evil
If God exists, then He is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good.
If God were omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good, then the world would not contain evil.
The world contains evil.
Therefore, God does not exist. Beginning with Premise one, it states that if God exists, then He is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good. This meaning that God knows everything, He is all-powerful, and great. I believe that premise one is true. God is great and perfectly good. However, Atheists disagree. They depend on evidence to question God’s existence. In saying this, atheists believe that evidence needs inductive and empirical reasoning, as well as logical and conceptual premises. A difference exists between theism and atheism in that atheists have not offered faith as a justification for non-belief. That being said, atheists have presented no-evidence defenses for believing …show more content…
A theodicy is an argument that attempts to make evil compatible with God. Conceivably the most famous theodicy is the free will defence. It argues that evil is the product of our free will. God gave us free will, something that is very beneficial. It is better to have a universe that is free, than without. However, being morally imperfect does not use free will for good, but sometimes brings about evil. Yet God cannot make people with free will act appropriately. Given how great free will is, it can bring about evil too. For example, a person is made good until they murder an innocent person. That is morally wrong and that person used their free will to inflict evil. We can object that the argument only deals with moral evil, evil that people bring about, through choice. It does not account for natural