Articles Of Confederation Flaws

Improved Essays
The development of the New World as a nation underwent several significant changes to accomplish what it is today. From this, many ideologies and legislations were implemented to unify the thirteen colonies and one of the written laws initiated during the time of development, were the Articles of Confederation. Although the Articles of Confederation were written to provide the colonies with an impression of a united country, the document itself possessed numerous flaws that left the country feeling the opposite. This will be illustrated by reviewing the Congress’ inadequate influence in the approval of legislations, taxation of the states, and foreign policies in the existing colonies during the 18th century.
Prior to the victory of the American
…show more content…
Thus, the Articles of Confederation was written to provide a sense of unification among the thirteen colonies of North America. However, the articles proved to be more troublesome than convenient for the Congress. One of the many flaws that the articles possess is the procedure of the admissions of new legislations. Congress faced many predicament in passing laws as it was agreed in the articles that nine out of the thirteen states must comply before it was enacted (Davis, 100). For example, to simply rectify or change anything in the Articles of Confederation needed a unanimous agreement with all thirteen states (Hux, Jarman, Gleberzon, 59). This proved to be quite difficult as war was present at the time made the process slower as many states were quite occupied with their own predicaments. Article ten of the document also states that the bureaucracy of the country shall only be approved to execute laws but only when consent from nine states are given, provided that …show more content…
America, under article two of the document, enabled its states to keep its own sovereignty, freedom and independence (Magill, 289). This ensued the federal government to gain an insufficient influence and the states to keep its authority. This appeared to be a considerable obstacle when Congress tried to address the issue of taxation amongst the states. Congress was deficient in its power to impose tariffs as each state alone could tax itself or oversee its commerce, although each was to contribute its share of money to maintain its confederation (Magill, 289) . The Articles of Confederation ordered consequential duties to the Congress without giving them the power to accomplish those responsibilities (Magill, 289). With the Congress’ inability to tax the American citizen, they could only hope that the states will meet their appointed claims and cooperate in order vital areas (Magill, 289). However, the colonies, who noted the funds, proved to be exceedingly reluctant to pay for the aftermath of the revolutionary war (Reynolds, 59). Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and Robert Morris (an affluent Philadelphia financier) endowed part of the war and proposed a five percent import duty but a number of states refused to cooperate (Reynolds, 59). The power to print and borrow money remained in the powers of the states causing a massive inflation and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With each state acting separately, there was no national military, thus putting the borders of the new country at risk. However, due to Article II, the central government was not able to interfere with any interstate issues. The central government was a single Congress, which left the execution of the few laws to be left by each state. The powers given to Congress in the Articles of Confederation were the ability to declare war and peace, make treaties or alliances, to coin or borrow money and to regulate trade with…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America declared its independence in July of 1776, Congress knew this was their opportunity to create something completely out of the ordinary, that would have to stand the tale of time. The following year, the Continental Congress created the Articles of Confederation, which ultimately divided the federal government from the state. This article wrote the ground rules for America's regulation of currency, foreign affairs and guidelines for war, but left out the States, to decipher their policies individually (1*). Ten years later, the Constitutional Convention knew that America needed to be seen as a whole, even with the separation of power. The Constitution was written to unionize the States with the Federal government, and was finalized…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The articles of confederation was the Untied States first attempt at creating a democratic government. Meaning instead of giving power to the central government they decided to divide it up with different states. But it all wasn't good, congress had trouble passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed (Doc 1). Congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expense of the national government (Doc 2). Also the states refused to give the national government enough power to work correctly.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the articles of confederation wasn’t running our country in the right direction. The Articles of confederation had no central power, at all. The Federal government then became the main focus of the two contracts, because it was more stable. Under the Articles of Confederation the state held all the power and they gave some power to the federal government, which caused economic, trading and law problems. The constitution then gave more power to the federal government and gave the states less power because that would give a central power for people.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The articles required the assent of nine states and the committee could not exercise military, diplomatic, or fiscal powers or make any…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was a lot of communication within states. Which meant that if there was ever a conflict then they could resolve it without war, or severe consequences. The Articles of Confederation had many strength, but as did weaknesses. A weakness was that Congress had no type of income, because each state had their own currency. Congress wasn’t able to impose taxes; they were only allowed to borrow money.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were extremely flawed and therefore resulted in a weak central government. The vice versa statement given above is flawed itself because it misplaced the cause and effect. So no, I cannot agree with the statement given but can agree with the alternative statement that I have provided above. The Articles had a strong theme in mind: protect the rights of the citizens in the new America and establish power within their hands.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the form of united government in the mind, the Articles did fail to handle important issues such as legislative disorganization,…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles Of Confederation were drafted under the Second Continental Congress, and stood for all thirteen states between 1781 and 1789, when a new Constitution was ratified. While considered to be a failure in the long-term, and an impotent authority from which a central government could efficiently act, the Articles were not a completely ineffective form of government. Under the Articles, congress was able to carry out multiple, influential programs involving the eventual forming of states in the western areas of American territory, and in foreign policy endeavors. The imposition of the Land Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the treaties with both France and Britain, and even association with Canadian territories all…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, through the implied powers and other such related powers of government the court system finally allowed goods to be traded fairly around the county, not only this, but the government followed through a plan with Alexander Hamilton and passed “the bank bill” (Goldfield p.210) which allowed the government to create banks. With the passing of the Coinage Act of 1792 the monetary system was set in place, and with the government now controlling the taxing the economy could grow. Yet, this was only achieved because the powers of the Constitution had not yet been properly…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Articles of Confederation, Congress was a single house in which each state had one vote. Even though each state could have two to seven members representing them in congress. Congress could conduct foreign affairs, make treaties, and maintain an army and navy, and borrow and print money. But the big flaw was the Congress could not collect taxes or enforce laws directly. The states had the power to tax and enforce its own laws.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There was no president to enforce the laws and no judiciary to interpret them. Major decisions required the approval of nine states rather than a simple majority” (Foner 240). These problems are what ultimately led to the demise of The Articles of Confederation. To help “generate support, Hamilton, Madison, and Jay composed a series of 85 essays that appeared in newspapers... and were gathered as a book, The Federalist, in 1788” (Foner 254). They were trying to get people t understand that the Constitution was helping and protecting them.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without these keystone structure the congress proved to be in a disadvantage. Overall with no uniform systems upon each state, truly portrays disorganization rather than unity. These attributes established the weakness within the Articles of Confederation thus needed to be replaced. The Articles contributed to a ineffective, inconsistent, and weakness of a early central institution. Neglecting the faults of the Articles of Confederation, it became one of the major steppingstone which progressed America to the…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays