Aristotle's Definition Of Happiness In The Nicomachean Ethics

Improved Essays
When I asked my family what they thought the word pleasure meant, I received several answers all of which connected pleasure to happiness or joy, but that’s not what pleasure truly is; not to Aristotle at least. The definition to pleasure in the Nicomachean Ethics is “Pleasure together with pain, a crucial determinant of human action and hence crucial to Aristotle’s account of moral virtue and vice. The noun supplies the root of the English term hedonism, that is, the philosophic doctrine according to which the good all human beings of necessity seek is some kind of pleasure.” (Bartlett and Collins 2011) This statement is vague on what pleasure actually is but allows us to see what Aristotle thinks it does. So, is pleasure good or bad? Does …show more content…
The Nicomachean Ethics gives basically the same definition for pain as pleasure, but if you have ever tasted ice cream or accidently burned your hand in the oven I believe you know the difference. So then, you understand pleasure is something you may long for and pain may be something you try to avoid; but they both direct your actions. When you were a child you most likely did not want to clean your room, but your Mom may have promised ice cream if you cleaned, so you cleaned in order to gain pleasure. The exact opposite your Father may have promised you a swat if you did not clean, so you cleaned in order to escape pain. In these examples it’s easy to see pleasure and pain directing our actions, but we still have not answered my question. Is pleasure good or …show more content…
I see his point as well, if you look at someone who only tries to satisfy their bodily desires (sex, food and alcohol), you might say they are childish, animalistic, or even without reason. To be without reason you would drop a rank in the levels of the soul and become a beast, according to Aristotle. Though he would most likely not say this, there is no way to strip one of their soul and give them a new, humans are born with reason, some may just choose not to use it. I would guess this far you would conclude that pleasure is not good, so is pain good? Well this is quite simply answered; Aristotle makes the point that pain can keep us from doing the right things. Imagine this, a person sees another person about to walk a little too close to a bee hive, but instead of going and helping them, they keep their distance because of the possibility of being stung themselves. If they would have helped I would say that would have been an act of courage, which is a virtue. so therefore, I would say this is not a courageous person because pain directed their actions. Pain is also not good for the virtuous

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the “Letter to Menoeceus”, Epicurus argues that pleasure is the only essential good that people seek. He argues that pleasure is the only thing that people should pursue for its own sake. In this paper, I will make that the argument that pleasure or pain’s absence are not the only things worth pursuing for their own sake. Epicurus—a psychological hedonist—argues that “the end of all our actions is to be free of pain and fear” (Epicurus, par. 6). To summarize his argument, he states that pleasure is the ultimate result of all of our actions.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical theories of both Aristotle and Epictetus, laid out in their books the Nicomachean Ethics and the Enchiridion, respectively, offer humanity insight into the most effective ways to achieve happiness and to exhibit virtue. Aristotle’s approach to happiness is that it must be looked at as the end to a means not as a means to an end. He feels that happiness should be viewed as the highest good within life. Although Epictetus agrees that happiness is the highest attainable good, he believes that the source of humanity’s misery is people’s inability to differentiate between what they can control and what they cannot. While both philosopher’s theories emphasize the importance of happiness and virtue in a person’s life, Epictetus’ view…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle’s rebuttal to this statement is that the good is something that is eternal, universal, and unchangeable. To understand if Aristotle’s rebuttal to the objector’s argument is correct, the objector’s argument must first be outlined. He does this within book three chapter five of the Nicomachean Ethics. “But some might argue as follows: ‘All men seek what appears good to them, but they have no control over how things appear to them; the end appears different to different men’” (1114b1).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A baby does not touch a stove when it is hot because they will get burnt and that is not pleasurable. Infants seek pleasure and not pain. This is the same for adults. Adults seek pleasure in everything they do like an infant however sometimes it is harder for adults to see what is the clearer path to pleasure because adults have more complicated beliefs about what pleasure is. This in turn gets in the way of people achieving happiness because they are unable to find what is pleasurable.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper looks to discuss Nozick’s experience machine. The paper begins by reconstructing Nozick’s experiment, and explains its consequences. The paper then argues that the experiment is actually consistent with hedonism, as by expanding on the definition of pleasure we see that by not plugging in we are actually doing the more pleasurable act. Nozick experiment asks us to imagine a machine that once connected to allows for us to experience the greatest possible pleasures.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Julius Caesar once said “It is easier to find men who will volunteer to die, than to find those who are willing to endure pain with patience.” Pain is an extreme emotion that we all experience on a quite frequent basis. It is so extreme in fact, anyone who truly endured the deepest of pains would likely agree that even death, a void that contains absolutely no emotion, would be more preferable. Pain weighs down on our souls, blurs the sight of our world, and stops the production that could occur in the absence of it.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In philosophy there are many stands to take when it comes to a view of topic shared and discovered by many. Specifically, there are three philosophers that have differing ideas on the role of pleasure in morality, Aristotle, Kant, and Mill. They share and clarify their positions through a plethora of titles and information that will help a reader gain a better understanding of the role of pleasure in morality. Though each philosopher has their own share of ideas of what the highest good represents, they all believe in morality being the search for the highest good. Aristotle begins with his description of happiness as fulfillment of all desires, in accordance with compliance of virtue.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his book, Pleasure and the Good Life, Fred Feldman introduces an idea known as Default Hedonism. Default hedonism can be broken down into three separate claims that tie together in a single formula. Before default hedonism is defined, Feldman shares that some assumptions about pleasure and pain should be made. The first two assumptions address pleasure. The first assumption is that pleasures are certain feelings or sensations that result in an “episode.”…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The highest good just requires that one live happily and by living one should not be anywhere near dying – therefore, all animals including humans should share in the aim for the same ultimate good, as we are all living things. The way we go about achieving this good life is different, but in any case, we are all striving towards living more than dying – therefore more pleasure than pain. Cicero’s argument is that by saying pleasure is the highest good, this would allow for immoral acts being a good should a person find it pleasurable. However, I do not see this as a problem because if committing immoral acts is the persons operationalised definition of pleasure, then committing them does add more to his life. Morality does not really have a part in hedonism unless individuals include that in their operationalised definition of pleasure.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5). Aristotle introduces the concept of happiness in relation to the motive and purpose present for decision-making and choices. Happiness is associated to the good that ‘choice’ and ‘knowledge’ partially…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autonomy Vs Hedonism

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is more important: happiness or reality, morality and autonomy? This question is a thought experiment by the philosopher Robert Nozick in order to refute the philosophy of Ethical Hedonism. This theory says that only happiness is necessary for a good life, and it is also sufficient; we do not need anything else. For hedonists happiness is the only intrinsic value, which means that everything else improves our lives only to the extent that it makes us happy. The term of hedonism, comes from the Greek word “hédoné” which means pleasure.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believed that virtues were a way to gain human pleasure. Aristotle did not agree with pleasure being the source of happiness. Instead, he believed that a person should look out for their own self-interests. Secondly, both philosophers believed that happiness can be found in the community.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism In Lying

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The ultimate aim is pleasure over pain. A utilitarian…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unlike Kant, Aristotle believed that virtue could be measured; and to be virtuous according to Aristotle, a person had to contain goodwill for the greatest good and make choices based on that. When it comes to pleasure and pain, Aristotle states that having the right attitude towards these two feelings is an important habit in forming moral virtue. For example, a greedy eater might feel inappropriate pleasure when presented with food and inappropriate pain when deprived of food; a moderate person will experience pleasure from abstaining from such indulgence. Although Kant and Aristotle have some contrasting views, there are some similarities.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This examination advocates that pleasure and pain are substantial in the moral evaluation of an individual’s attitude towards a situation. This view also suggest that pleasure and pain are critical in a moral life, because if not primary they are always exist…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays