Arguments Against Net Neutrality

Merriam Webster defines Net Neutrality as a requirement for all Internet Service Providers(ISPs) to treat all Internet data the same regardless of its source, type, or destination. Some people argue against net neutrality because they feel that the government should not be allowed to regulate the Internet. Net Neutrality is an important part of our society, it allows for an open Internet which is free from discrimination, monopolies, and prevents it from becoming stagnant. ISPs are like the gatekeepers of the Internet, they have the ability to control what information you get and how fast you get it. The lack of any sort of regulation would allow for these companies to abuse their power and block, throttle, or charge certain customers more for access to certain websites. The growing use of Internet data by companies highlights this issue because the cost of entry could become too high or their internet connection be throttled too low to operate. Net …show more content…
Net Neutrality would prevent larger companies from bullying out smaller companies by treating all internet traffic the same. This would allow for more small businesses to expand and continue to create new products for consumers. The more companies that are producing and making a profit the better the economy is because they are able to innovate and create jobs in the technology industry. Although I see the reason for people wanting to get rid of Net Neutrality, I do not agree with the concept. Opponents of Net Neutrality think that the internet with less regulation will run more efficiently because the government is not effective with its regulation. Opponents also feel that companies will start offering cheaper prices because they want to compete for consumer’s business. Net Neutrality is important, however, because it allows for a fairer market that treats every company/person the