The controversy on whether euthanasia should be a viable option to end terminal disease is such an opinionated topic in society today. Most of the United States opposes mercy killing, but it is legal in some countries. Euthanasia also known as mercy killing, is the process in where another individual directly ends the life of another person primarily , because they are convinced that is the ideal option to relieve the suffering and agony from an incurable terminal condition. Individuals that concur with this action state that it is in their divine right to end their own lives, but euthanasia belittles the value of live , because it tells us that we can terminate our or someone else's life so facile.
Legalizing mercy killing can destroy the ideology of life and create a dysfunctional civilization. For example according to the article Arguments against Euthanasia “authorizing …show more content…
Doctors should not break their Hippocratic Oath on where they swear on protecting the human life not murdering. One of the fundamental duties of the state is to protect the life of the American citizens as stated in the 14th amendment. A civilized society should always protect the weak and the life of a citizen; it is in our Declaration of Independence and in our Constitution, the fundamental documents in where our nation was founded. There is voluntary and involuntary mercy killing. Involuntary euthanasia is very similar to murder, so if it was to be legalized all around the world murders like psychopaths for example would say they murdered an individual, because euthanasia was in their defense. Killing another person is manslaughter and these murders are convicted for it so what's the difference in euthanasia? Killing other human beings and allowing them to end themselves, like the weak, the sick and the unborn is barbaric and exceedingly
Legalizing mercy killing can destroy the ideology of life and create a dysfunctional civilization. For example according to the article Arguments against Euthanasia “authorizing …show more content…
Doctors should not break their Hippocratic Oath on where they swear on protecting the human life not murdering. One of the fundamental duties of the state is to protect the life of the American citizens as stated in the 14th amendment. A civilized society should always protect the weak and the life of a citizen; it is in our Declaration of Independence and in our Constitution, the fundamental documents in where our nation was founded. There is voluntary and involuntary mercy killing. Involuntary euthanasia is very similar to murder, so if it was to be legalized all around the world murders like psychopaths for example would say they murdered an individual, because euthanasia was in their defense. Killing another person is manslaughter and these murders are convicted for it so what's the difference in euthanasia? Killing other human beings and allowing them to end themselves, like the weak, the sick and the unborn is barbaric and exceedingly