Humans take advantage of places that are peaceful so if they start going to Antarctica, most likely they will cause more damage to the land. Based on this evidence, I’m guessing that some people don’t know how to care for nature like others. In the text, “This may be simply because few mineral or oil deposits have ever discovered, nations will certainly be quick to begin fighting for them” pg#5. The nations can have war and if they find it, they can cause further injury to the land. From this evidence, if Americans got to Antarctica, leaders in different countries will find out and it may cause major problems with other countries resulting in war. Kendra’s argument is stronger because she explains her argument by using many strong pieces of evidence.
However, Michael’s argument is . According to the text, “While Antarctica still exists in its present state, people must take the opportunity to …show more content…
According to the text, “Global warming, a gradual heating of the plant thought to be caused by pollution, has melted much of Antarctica’s ancient ice and may soon lead to greater harm” pg#7. Global warming is affecting the land so if people go to Antarctica, they will harm the land. I think from this evidence, how the global warming harm the coldest place on earth. However, Michael Serillo says the land is beautiful and we should take advantage of this opportunity. In the text, “Someday, the amazing frozen land may have little ice remaining. People should travel to Antarctica now to enjoy its unique qualities while they still exist. Perhaps in doing so, people may even discover new ways to protect the ice from future damage” pg#6. This explains that Global Warming is affecting the land and the evidence shows that Michael have some sympathy. I think that we should find ways to help the land from melting but I think good scientists that care about nature should go
However, Michael’s argument is . According to the text, “While Antarctica still exists in its present state, people must take the opportunity to …show more content…
According to the text, “Global warming, a gradual heating of the plant thought to be caused by pollution, has melted much of Antarctica’s ancient ice and may soon lead to greater harm” pg#7. Global warming is affecting the land so if people go to Antarctica, they will harm the land. I think from this evidence, how the global warming harm the coldest place on earth. However, Michael Serillo says the land is beautiful and we should take advantage of this opportunity. In the text, “Someday, the amazing frozen land may have little ice remaining. People should travel to Antarctica now to enjoy its unique qualities while they still exist. Perhaps in doing so, people may even discover new ways to protect the ice from future damage” pg#6. This explains that Global Warming is affecting the land and the evidence shows that Michael have some sympathy. I think that we should find ways to help the land from melting but I think good scientists that care about nature should go